New ways of looking into handwritten miscellanies of the seventeenth century: the case of “Spes Altera”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.4339Keywords:
Rewriting, “Spes Altera”, 1630, handwritten miscellanies, Shakespeare Sonnet 2, 1609 QuartoAbstract
A large number of copies of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 2 circulated in handwritten miscellanies from the second quarter of the Seventeenth Century. Eleven of those copies have significant variant readings that have led critics to put forward different hypotheses regarding their nature and quality. Most critics, taking into account stylometric analyses, have regarded them as early drafts of Shakespeare’s printed version, and have agreed on their poor quality.
By paying due attention to the text’s context of production and reception, we have reached a different conclusion regarding both the nature and quality of the handwritten versions of Sonnet 2. In our view, they are the product of a conscious rewriting on the part of some educated member of the universities or Inns of Court. Close reading of the manuscript copy text (Spes Altera, Bellasys Ms, c.1630), and a line by line comparison with the 1609 Q text, suggest a deliberate attempt on the part of its adapter at increasing the poem’s metrical regularity and structural coherence.Downloads
References
Beal, P. 1980. Index of Literary Manuscripts. Vol. 1, Part 2. London: Mansell.
Burke, V. E. 2004. “Reading Friends: Women’s Participation in ‘Masculine’ Literary Culture”. Early Modern Women’s Manuscript Writing: Selected Papers from the Trinity / Trent Colloquium. Eds. V. E. Burke and J. Gibson. Aldershot: Ashgate. 75-90.
Burrow, C. 2007. “Editing the Sonnets”. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ed. M. Schoenfeldt. Oxford: Blackwell. 145-162
Crowley, L. M. 2018. Manuscript Matters: Reading John Donne’s Poetry and Prose in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Early English Books Online. 2003-2019. Ann Arbor, Michigan, MI: ProQuest, LLC.
Ennis, L. 1941. “Margaret Bellasys’ ‘Characterismes of Vices’”. PMLA 56 (1): 141-150.
Ezell, M. J. M. 2015. “Handwriting and the Book”. The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book. Eds. L. Howsam and M. J. M. Ezell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 90-106.
Henderson, J. R. 2007. “Humanism and the Humanities: Erasmus’s Opus de Conscribendis Epistolis in Sixteenth-Century Schools”. Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present. Eds. C. Poster and L. C. Mitchell. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press. 141-177.
Jackson, M. P. 2001. “Vocabulary and Chronology: The Case of Shakespeare’s Sonnets”. Review of English Studies, 205: 59-75.
Love, H. 2013. “The Manuscript after the Coming of Print”. The Book. A Global History. Eds. M. F. Suarez, S.J. and H.R. Woudhuysen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.197-204.
Marotti, A. F. 2006. “The Social Context and Nature of Donne’s Writing: Occasional Verse and Letters”. The Cambridge Companion to John Donne. Ed. A. Guibbory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 35-48.
Marotti, A. F. 2007. “Shakespeare’s Sonnets and the Manuscript Circulation of Texts in Early Modern England”. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ed. M. Schoenfeldt. Oxford: Blackwell. 204-223.
Marotti, A. F. and M. Freiman. 2011. “The English Sonnet in Manuscript, Print and Mass Media”. The Cambridge Companion to the Sonnet. Eds. A. D. Cousins and P. Howarth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 66-83.
Marotti, A. F. 2016a. “Christ Church, Oxford, and Beyond: Folger MS V.a.345 and Its Manuscript and Print Sources”. Studies in Philology 113 (4): 850-878.
Marotti, A. F. 2016b. “The Circulation of Verse at the Inns of Court and in London in Early Stuart England”. Re-evaluating the Literary Coterie, 1580-1830. Eds. W. Bowers and H. L. Crummé. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 53-73.
Moulton, I. F. 2000. Before Pornography: Erotic Writing in Early Modern England. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Callaghan. 2006. “Performing Politics: The Circulation of the Parliament Fart”. Huntington Library Quarterly 69: 121-138.
Pebworth, T. L. 2006. “The Text of Donne’s Writings”. The Cambridge Companion to John Donne. Ed. A. Guibbory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23-34.
Roberts, S. 2003. Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schoenfeldt, M. 2007. “The Sonnets”. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s Poetry. Ed. P. Cheney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 125-143.
Schoenfeldt, M. (Ed.). 2007. A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shakespeare, W. 1609. Shake-speares sonnets Neuer before imprinted. Ed. T. T[horpe]. London: William Aspley.
Shakespeare, W. 1985. Shakespeare’s Sonnets and A Lover’s Complaint. Ed. S. Wells. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 1997. The Norton Shakespeare. Based on the Oxford Edition. Eds. S. Greenblatt, W. Cohen, J. E. Howard and K. Eisaman Maus. New York, NY and London: W.W. Norton. (Original work published in 1623)
Shakespeare, W. 1999 (1986). The Sonnets and A Lover’s Complaint. Ed. J. Kerrigan. New York, NY: Viking Penguin. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 2002 (1997). Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ed. K. Duncan Jones. London Thomson Learning. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 2002. William Shakespeare. The Complete Sonnets and Poems. Ed. C. Burrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 2006 (1996). The Sonnets. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. The New Cambridge Shakespeare (updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 2006 (2004). Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Poems. Eds. B. A. Mowat and P. Werstine. New York, N Y: Washington Square Press. (Original work published in 1609)
Shakespeare, W. 2007. The RSC Shakespeare. William Shakespeare. Complete Works. Eds. J. Bate and E. Rasmussen. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan. (Original work published in 1623)
Shakespeare, W. 2016. The New Oxford Shakespeare. The Complete Works. Modern Critical Edition. Eds. G. Taylor, J. Jowett, T. Bourus and G. Egan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1623)
Shakespeare, W. 2017. The New Oxford Shakespeare. The Complete Works. Critical Reference Edition. Vol. 1. Eds. G. Taylor, J. Jowett, T. Bourus and G. Egan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1623)
Smyth, A. 2006. “‘Reade in one age and understood i’th’next’: Recycling Satire in the Mid-Seventeenth Century”. Huntington Library Quarterly 69 (1): 67-82.
Smyth, A. 2010. “Commonplace Book Culture: Sixteen Traits”. Women and Writing, c. 1340-c.1650: The Domestication of Print Culture. Eds. A. L. Mathers and P. Hardman. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer. 90-110.
Taylor, G. 1985. “Some Manuscripts of Shakespeare’s Sonnets”. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 68: 210-246.
Virgil. 1620. Eclogues, with his booke De apibus, concerning the gouernment and ordering of bees, translated grammatically, and also according to the proprietie of our English tongue, so farre as grammar and the verse will well permit. Written chiefly for the good schooles, to be vsed according to the directions in the preface to the painfull schoole maister, and more fully in the booke called Ludus literarius, or the grammar-schoole. Ludus literarius. Trans. J. Brinsley Ch. 8. London: Richard Field (2nd edn). (Original work published 37 BC)
Wells, S., Taylor, G., Jowett, J. and W. Montgomery. 1997. William Shakespeare. A textual Companion. New York, NY and London: W.W. Norton (1987. Oxford University Press).
Wilson, T., trans. 1553. “An Epistle to Persuade a Yong Iengleman to Marriage, Deuised by Erasmus in the Behalfe of his Frende”. The arte of rhetorique for the vse of all suche as are studious of eloquence, sette forth in English, by Thomas Wilson. London: Richardus Graftonus.
Wilson, T. 1993. The Art of Rhetoric (1560). Edited with notes and commentary by Peter E. Medine. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
