Going Down in Herstory
Re-writing Women’s Lives in Michèle Roberts’s “On the Beach at Trouville”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.4784Keywords:
Michèle Roberts, herstory, women’s historical fiction, re-writing, subversion, intertextualityAbstract
Throughout her writing career, Michèle Roberts has been one of the contemporary women writers who has re-constructed and retold the lives of previously forgotten, silenced or marginalised women. In an attempt to re-inscribe their voice, Roberts has re-written history from the female perspective by going back to the lives of female saints, Biblical figures and other female writers. In her last collection of short stories, Mud: Stories of Sex and Love, all the protagonists are women taken from historical or literary texts, to whom she has given voice, providing the reader with new visions of reality. This paper focuses on “On the Beach at Trouville”, and analyses the strategies Roberts has used both to present the lives of Thérèse of Lisieux and Camille Monet from their own perspectives and to subvert the patriarchal construction of history.
Downloads
References
Aesthetica Magazine. 2010. “Michéle Roberts. Q&A”. <https://aestheticamagazine.com/michele-roberts/>. (Accessed 30 May 2020).
Bastida Rodríguez, P. 2003. “On Women, Christianity, and History: An interview with Michèle Roberts”. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos 25 (2): 93-107.
Butler, R. 2008. Hidden in the Shadow of the Master: The Model-Wives of Cézanne, Monet, and Rodin. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Cooper, K. and E. Short, eds. 2012. The Female Figure in Contemporary Historical Fiction. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Falcus, S. 2008. “Michèle Roberts: Histories and herstories in In the Red Kitchen, Fair Exchange and The Looking Glass”. Metafiction and Metahistory in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Eds. A. Heilmann and M. Llewelyn. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 133-146.
Galván, F. 1998. “Writing as a Woman.” Interview with Fernando Galván. European Journal of English Studies 2 (3): 359-375.
García Sánchez, M. S. 2005. “Talking about Women, History and Writing with Michèle Roberts”. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos 27 (2): 137-147.
Goszczynska, M. 2018. “Michèle Roberts’s Mud and the Practice of Feminist Re-Vision”. Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 13 (2): 89-96.
Gruss, S. 2009. The Pleasure of the Feminist Text: Reading Michèle Roberts and Angela Carter. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Harris, S. 2012. “Imagine. Investigate. Intervene?: A consideration of feminist intent and metafictive invention in the historical fictions of A. S. Byatt and Marina Warner”. The Female Figure in Contemporary Historical Fiction. Eds. K. Cooper and E. Short. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 171-188.
Heilmann, A. and M. Llewelyn, eds. 2007. Metafiction and Metahistory in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hertel, R. 2005. Making Sense: Sense Perception in the British Novel of the 1980s and 1990s. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Humm, M. 2013. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Feminist Literary Criticism. London and New York: Routledge.
Hutcheon, L. 1988. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory and Fiction. London and New York: Routledge.
Jerinic, M. 1996. “Cixous, Hélène”. Encyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory. Ed. E. Kowaleski Wallace. London and New York: Routledge. 108-111.
Newman, J. 2004. “An Interview with Michèle Roberts”. Contemporary British and Irish fiction: Novelists in Interview. Eds. S. Monteith, J. Newman and P. Wheeler. London: Arnold. 119-134.
Martin, Thérèse (of Lisieux). 1795. The Story of a Soul: The Autobiography of St. Thérèse of Lisieux With Additional Writings and Sayings of St. Thérèse. Trans. John Clarke. Electronic edition.
Minsky, R. 1996. Psychoanalysis and Gender: An Introductory Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
Plate, L. 2011. Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women’s Rewriting. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Plumer, P. 2001. “Re-writing the House of Fiction: Michèle Roberts’s Daughters of the House.” Engendering Realism and Postmodernism. Contemporary Women Writers in Britain. Ed. B. Neumeier. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. 63-86.
Reviews. Virago Press site for Michèle Roberts’s novel The Mistressclass. <http://www.virago.co.uk/display.asp?ISB=9781860499821&TAG=&CID=&PGE=&LANG=en>. (Accessed 30 May 2020).
Roberts, M. “FAQ”. Michèle Roberts’s Website. <http://www.micheleroberts.co.uk/faqs.htm> (Accessed 28 May 2020).
Roberts, M. 1991 (1984). The Wild Girl. London: Minerva.
Roberts, M. 1993a (1987). The Book of Mrs. Noah. London: Minerva.
Roberts, M. 1993b (1992). Daughters of the House. London: Virago Press.
Roberts, M. 1997. Impossible Saints. London: Virago Press.
Roberts, M. 2000. The Looking Glass. London: Little, Brown.
Roberts, M. 2002a. The Mistressclass. London: Little, Brown.
Roberts, M. 2002b (1983). The Visitation. London: The Women’s Press.
Roberts, M. 2004 (1999). Fair Exchange. London: Virago Press.
Roberts, M. 2011 (2010). Mud: Stories of Sex and Love. London: Virago Press.
Sengupta, J. 2006. Refractions of Desire: Feminist Perspectives in the Novels of Toni Morrison, Michèle Roberts and Anita Desai. New Delhi: Atlantic Books.
Villegas López, S. 2001. “Telling Women’s Lives: Vision as Historical Revision in the Work of Michèle Roberts”. Atlantis. Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos 23 (1): 173-188.
Wallace, D. 2005. The Woman’s Historical Novel: British Women Writers, 1900-2000. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Silvia García-Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
