Imagination and nonliterality : a case study of superhuman entities in religion

Authors

  • María Dolores Fernández de la Torre Madueño University of Málaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.43

Abstract

In the present work we would like to emphasize the aspect of imagination as an element of great relevance in the production of metaphorical processes. With the experientialism upheld by the cognitive approach, people's imaginative ability is established as one of the main arguments to face any lexical analysis from a cognitive perspective. A double focus can be appreciated in the religious vocabulary: On one hand, the experience that the members of a linguistic community live directly and personally and on the other hand, a virtual creation of such an experience, a sort of "imagined experience". In it, imagination would be characterized by the ability to transfer certain conceptualizations and ideas to human domains; conceptualizations and ideas which, from a theological point of view, are neither present nor located in such domains. This focus centers on a series of religious lexemes of a superhuman nature, angel and devil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cienki, A. 1998. “STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions”. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 2: 107-149.

Fernández de la Torre Madueño, M.D. 1997. Significados no literales. Codificación del léxico religioso inglés en el lenguaje coloquial. Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga.

Fesmire, S. A. 1994. “What is “Cognitive” about Cognitive Linguistics?”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9, 2: 149-154.

Geeraerts, D. 1992. “Polysemy and Prototypicality”. Cognitive Linguistics 3, 2: 219-231.

Gibbs JR, R.W. And Colston, H.L. 1995. “The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations”. Cognitive Linguistics 6, 4: 347-378.

Gorayska, B. 1993. “Reflections: A commentary on “Philosophical Implications of Cognitive Semantics””. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1: 47-53.

Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, M. 1992. “Philosophical implications of Cognitive Semantics”. Cognitive Linguistics 3, 4: 345-366.

Johnson, M. 1993a. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Moral Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, M. 1993b. “Why cognitive semantics matters to philosophy”. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1: 62-74.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Leddy, T. 1995. “Metaphor and Metaphysics”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 3: 205-222.

Mark, P. 1983. Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. London: Longman.

Oxford English Dictionary on CD-Rom. 1994. Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. ed. 1987. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. London and Glasgow: Collins.

Sinha, C. 1993. “Cognitive Semantics and Philosophy: A Reply to Mark Johnson”. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1: 53-62.

Turner, M. and Fauconnier, G. 1995. “Conceptual integration and formal expression”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 3: 183-204.

Way, E. C. 1991. Knowledge, Representation and Metaphor. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Summers, D. 1987. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Essex: Longman.

Wilkinson, P.R. 1993. Thesaurus of Traditional English Metaphors. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

29-05-1999

How to Cite

Fernández de la Torre Madueño, M. D. (1999). Imagination and nonliterality : a case study of superhuman entities in religion. Journal of English Studies, 1, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.43