Conceptualization of events, semantic relations between constructions and topology : a catastrophe theoretic study of "get" and "be"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.45Abstract
The existence of syncretisms in the marked coding patterns for variations in the domains of transitivity and voice presumably indicate the interrelation between constructions involving different event views and voice alternations and voicerelated phenomena, such as inchoative and stative resultative morphosyntax. This paper will examine deviations from the prototypical event view, variations in transitivity and their relation to voice distinctions in constructions with be and get. It will be argued that the relations between these constructions and the position they occupy in semantic space are best understood in terms of the interaction between the conceptual status of participants as 'controller' or 'affected' (Klaiman 1988) and the conceptual property 'relative elaboration of events' (Kemmer 1993; 1994), correlating with different event views (Croft 1990; 1994).Downloads
References
Barber, E. 1975. “Voice - beyond the passive”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 16-24.
Bernárdez, E. 1995. “On the study of language with the tools of Catastrophe Theory”. Atlantis XVII(1-2): 261-291.
Bolinger, D. 1978 “Passive and transitivity again”. Forum Linguisticum 3(1): 25-28.
Cameron, C.A. 1990 The Semantics and Pragmatics of Voice Systems: A Functional Analysis. PhD Dissertation, Rice University. Published 1994. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Chappell, H. 1980 “Is the get-passive adversative?”. International Journal of Human Communication 13: 411-52.
Collins, P. 1996 “Get-passives in English”. World Englishes 15(1): 43-56.
Croft, W. 1990. “Possible verbs and the structure of events”. Meanings and Prototypes. Ed. S. Tsohatzidis. London: Routledge. 48-73.
Croft, W. 1994. “Voice: beyond control and affectedness”. Voice: Form and Funtion. Eds. B. Fox & P. Hopper. 89-118.
Déchaine, R.M. 1995 “One be”. Linguistics in The Netherlands. Eds. M. den Dikken & K. Hengeveld. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 73-88.
DeLancey, S. 1987. “Transitivity in grammar and cognition”. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Ed. R. Tomlin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 53-68.
Dik, S. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
Downing, A. 1996. “The semantics of Get-passives”. Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Eds. R. Hasan, C. Cloran & D. Butt. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179-205.
Dowty, D. 1991. “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection”. Language 67(3): 547- 619.
Foley, W.A. & R.D. van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, B. & P. Hopper. 1994. Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. & L. Yang. 1994. “The rise of the English Get-passive”. Voice: Form and Function. Eds. B. Fox & P. Hopper. 119-149.
Haegeman, L. 1985. “The GET-Passive and Burzio’s generalization”. Lingua 66: 53-77.
Haspelmath, M. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology”. Studies in Language 14(1): 25-72.
Hatcher, A.G. 1949. “To get/be invited”. Modern Language Notes 64: 433-46.
Hopper, P. & S. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse”. Language 56: 251-99.
Keenan, E. 1976. “Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’”. Subject and Topic. Ed. C.N. Li. New York: Academic Press. 305-333.
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kemmer, S. 1994. “Middle voice, transitivity and the elaboration of events”. Voice: Form and Function. Eds. B. Fox & P. Hopper. 179-230.
Keyser, S.J. & T. Roeper. 1984. “On the middle and ergative constructions in English”. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416.
Klaiman, M.H. 1988. “Affectedness and control: A typology of voice systems”. Passive and Voice. Ed. M. Shibatani. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25-84.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, R. 1971. “Passive resistance”. Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 149-62.
Langacker, R. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. 1991b. Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. 1997. “Losing control: grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency”. Paper delivered at the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, December 1997. Madrid.
Marín Arrese, J. 1992. La Pasiva en Inglés: Un Estudio Funcional-Tipológico. PhD Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Published 1993. Madrid: Editorial de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Marín Arrese, J. 1996. “Deagentivisation in the English passive: the role of viewpoint and attention flow”. Actas del XII Congreso Nacional de AESLA. 247-254. Universidad de Barcelona, abril 1994. Barcelona: AESLA.
Marín Arrese, J. 1997. “Agented agentive passives and non-optionality: A synergetic analysis”. XXI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos (AEDEAN). Universidad de Sevilla, diciembre 1997. Sevilla.
Nedjalkov, V. & S. Jaxontov. 1988. “The typology of resultative constructions”. Typology of Resultative Constructions. Ed. V. Nedjalkov. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3-62.
Rice, S. 1987. Towards a Cognitive Model of Transitivity. UC-San Diego PhD Dissertation. Published 1989. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Shibatani, M. 1985. “Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis”. Language 61: 821-48.
Smyth, H. 1920/1956. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wildgen, W. 1982. Catastrophe Theoretic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wildgen, W. 1994. Process, Image, and Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zandvoort, R.W. & J. van Ek. 1975. A Handbook of English Grammar. 7th edn. London: Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
