Grounding politeness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.53Abstract
Traditional theories of politeness, like Brown and Levinson’s (1987 [1978]) and Leech’s (1983), claim a universal status which can be questioned on the basis of the evidence provided by studies on the politeness mechanisms of the most diverse cultures. In the present paper, we attempt to prove that one of the reasons which prevents those theories from reaching the desired pancultural validity is no other than their use of conceptual metaphors (i.e. a culture-specific construct) in their explanation of politeness. In addition, we would like to establish a firmer ground for a crossculturally valid theory of politeness by considering the workings of some universal cognitive tools (i.e. image-schemas) in the conceptualization of this subject matter.Downloads
References
Bergen, B. K. 1996. Breakdown of Society. A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to Social Theory and the Concept of Society. PhD Dissertation. Unpublished Draft. University of California at Berkeley.
Blum-Kulka, S. 1992. “The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society”. Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987 (1978). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. and D. Schunk. 1980. “Polite responses to polite requests.” Cognition 8: 111-143.
Fraser, B. and W. Nolen. 1981. “The association of deference with linguistic form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.
Gentner, D. and D. Gentner. 1983. “Flowing waters and teeming crowds”. Mental Models. Eds. D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
Gentner, D. and A.L. Stevens, eds. 1983. Mental Models. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
Gu, Y. 1990. “Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237-258.
Haverkate, H. 1994. La cortesía verbal. Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.
Held, G. 1992. “Politeness in linguistic research”. Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and T. Ogino. 1986. “Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English”. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347-371.
Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. London and New York: Longman.
Ide, S. 1989. “Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness”. Multilingua 8: 223-248.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kasper, G. 1990. “Linguistic politeness: current research issues”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193-218.
Kövecses, Z. 1996. The Force of Emotion. Why Metaphor Matters. Unpublished Book Manuscript.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought . Ed. A. Ortony. Cambridge: CUP.
Lakoff, G. 1996. “Sorry, I’m not myself today: the metaphor system for conceptualizing the self.” Spaces, Worlds and Grammars. Eds. G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Mao, L. R. 1994. “Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed”. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451-486.
Matsumoto, Y.1989. “Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japanese”. Multilingua 8: 207-221.
Nwoye, O. G. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and sociocultural variation of the notion of face”. Journal of Pragmatics 18(4): 309-328.
O’Driscoll, J. 1996. “About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism”. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 1-32.
Pandharipande, R. 1992. “Defining politeness in Indian English”. World Englishes 11 (2/3): 241-250.
Pavlidou, T. 1994. “Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences”. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 487-511.
Peña Cervel, S. 1997. “The role of the event structure metaphor and of image-schematic structure in metaphors for happiness and sadness”. Miscelanea. Journal of English and American Studies 18: 253-266. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Sell, R.D. 1991. “The politeness of literary texts”. Literary Pragmatics. Ed. R. Sell. London: Routledge. 208-224.
Tannen, D. 1993. “The relativity of linguistic strategies: rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance”. Gender and Conversational Interaction. Ed. D.Tannen. New York: Oxford U.P.
Travis, C. 1998. “Omoiyari as a core Japanese value: Japanese-style empathy?”. Speaking of Emotions. Conceptualization and Expression. Eds. A. Athanasiadou and E. Tabakowska. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watts, R. J. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality.” Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, A. 1985. “Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English”. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145-178.
Wierzbicka, A. 1997. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: OUP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
