A Corpus-Assisted Analysis Of Conjoined Wh-Questions In English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.6612Keywords:
corpus linguistics, syntax, coordination, mixed languages, wh-questions, optional argumentsAbstract
This corpus study investigates conjoined wh-questions (CWHs), where two or more coordinated wh-phrases appear at the beginning of a sentence (e.g., When and where did they first meet?). Previous research suggests that English speakers readily accept adjunct coordination but generally reject argument coordination, while mixed patterns (involving an adjunct and an argument) are subject to interspeaker variation. Using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), this study confirms that English strongly favors adjunct coordination (over 90% of CWHs), while mixed coordination is uncommon (under 8%), and argument coordination is virtually absent. Notably, all coordinated arguments in the corpus were optional, suggesting structural constraints on CWHs. Finally, the data support a biclausal analysis of CWHs, reinforcing the idea that coordinated wh-phrases originate in separate clauses.
Downloads
References
Allerton, David J. Valency and the English Verb. Academic Press, 1982.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. “Implicit Arguments.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, edited by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, vol. 2, pp. 558-588. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Browne, Wayles. “Conjoined Questions and the Limitation on English Surface Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 2, 1972, pp. 223-226. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177703.
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. “brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan.” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 80, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
Chomsky, Noam. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. 7th ed., Foris Publications, 1981.
Chomsky, Noam. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, 1995.
Citko, Barbara. “The Puzzles of Wh-Questions with Coordinated Wh-Pronouns.” Challenges to Linearization, edited by Theresa Biberauer and Ian Roberts, Mouton de Gruyter, 2013, pp. 295-330, https://doi.org/10.1515/97816 14512431.295
Citko, Barbara, and Martina Gračanin-Yuksek. “Multiple (Coordinated) (Free) Relatives.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 34, 2016, pp. 393-427, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9306-8
Citko, Barbara, and Martina Gračanin-Yuksek. “Towards a New Typology of Coordinated Wh-Questions.” Journal of Linguistics, vol. 49, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1-32, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000175
Comorovski, Ileana. Interrogative Phrases and the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
Davies, Mark. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 2008-present, www.english-corpora.org/coca/
Faulhaber, Susen. Verb Valency Patterns: A Challenge for Semantics-Based Accounts. De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240788
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Jason Merchant. “Reverse Sluicing in English and Greek.” The Linguistic Review, vol. 15, no. 2-3, 1998, pp. 233-256, https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1998.15.2-3.233
Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. About Sharing. 2007. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PhD thesis. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39343
Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. “What and Why Can’t Be Shared.” April 2009. Middle East Technical University, http://users.metu.edu.tr/martina/what_and_why_Apr_2009_single_spaced_submitted_revised_FINAL_web.pdf
Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. “Conjoined Wh-questions.” The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, edited by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 2nd ed., Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017, 1127-1161, https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118358733.wbsyncom015
Gribanova, Vera. “Structural Adjacency and the Typology of Interrogative Interpretations.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 40, no. 1, 2009, pp. 133-154, https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.133
Grimshaw, Jane. “On the Syntax of Conjoined Wh-Words in English Questions.” University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 1, 1978,
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/umop/vol3/iss1/2
Haida, Andreas, and Sophie Repp. “Monoclausal Question Word Coordinations Across Languages.” Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS), vol. 39, edited by Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin, and Brian Smith, Amherst, MA: GLSA, 2011, pp. 373-386. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:221804053
Helbig, Gerhard. Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie. 3rd ed., Niemeyer, 1992.
Herbst, Thomas, and Susen Schüller. Introduction to Syntactic Analysis. A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 2008.
Hole, Daniel. “Arguments and Adjuncts.” Syntax - Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook, vol. 2, edited by Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, De Gruyter Mouton, 2015, pp. 1284-1320. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110363708
Kasai, Hironobu. “Coordinated Wh-questions in Japanese.” Lingua, vol. 183, 2016, pp. 126-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.009
Kazenin, Konstantin I. “On Coordination of Wh-phrases in Russian.” Tübingen University and Moscow State University, 2002.
Landau, Idan. “The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 41, no. 3, 2010, pp. 357-388.
Lewis, Shevaun, Dave Kush, and Bradley Larson. “What and When Can You Fill a Gap With Something?” Paper presented at the 25th CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, CUNY, 2012.
Lipták, Anikó. “Strategies of Wh-Coordination.” Linguistic Variation, vol. 11, no. 2, 2012, pp. 149-188. Linguistic Variation, https://hdl.handle.net/1887/61419
Merchant, Jason. The Syntax of Silence. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Nunes, Jairo. “Sideward Movement.” Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 32, no. 2, 2001, pp. 303-344. https://doi.org/10.1162/00243890152001780
Park, Myung-Kwan. “The Syntax of Conjoined Wh-Elements in English: A Preliminary Study.” Studies in Generative Grammar, vol. 16, no. 3, 2006, pp. 555-565.
Potter, David, and Michael Frazier. “English Wh&Wh Constructions: Conjoin and Move.” Proceedings of the 38th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Rachel Soo, Una Y. Chow, and Sander Nederveen, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2021, pp. 355-365. https://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/38/paper3580.pdf
Raţiu, Dafina. “A Multidominance Account for Conjoined Questions in Romanian.” Romance Linguistics 2010, edited by Julia Herschensohn, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011, pp. 257-270, https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.318.16rat
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2025.
Rudin, Catherine. “On Multiple Questions and Multiple Wh-Fronting.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 6, 1988, pp. 445-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134489
Skrabalova, Hana. “Parataxe Apparente et Coordination des Interrogatifs en Tchèque” [Apparent Parataxis and Coordination of Interrogatives in Czech]. Coordination et Subordination: Typologie et Modélisation [Coordination and Subordination: Typology and Modelling], edited by Isabelle Bril and Georges Rebuschi, Éditions Ophrys, pp. 231-242. https://hal.science/hal-00599016v1
Stan Development Team. RStan: The R Interface to Stan. 2024, https://mc-stan.org/.
Tesnière, Lucien. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck, 1959.
Tomaszewicz, Barbara. “Against Spurious Coordination in Multiple Wh-Questions.” Proceedings of the WCCFL 28, edited by Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer, and Barbara Tomaszewicz, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2011, pp. 186-195. https://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/28/ paper2451.pdf
Tomaszewicz, Barbara. “Wh & Wh: Syntactic and Semantic Arguments for Clausal Coordination.” Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 19, edited by John Frederick Bailyn, Ewan Dunbar, Yakov Konrod, and Chris LaTerza, Michigan Slavic Publications, 2012, Ann Arbor.
Wakefield, Jon. Bayesian and Frequentist Regression Methods. Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0925-1
Whitman, Neil. Category Neutrality: A Type-Logical Investigation. The Ohio State University, 2002, PhD thesis, OhioLINK, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495384
Whitman, Neil. “What and How We Can Learn from Mixed-Wh Interrogatives.” Manuscript, The Ohio State University, 2014.
Windeatt, Barry A., editor. Chaucer's Dream Poetry: Sources and Analogues. Boydell & Brewer Ltd, 1982.
Winter, Bodo. Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. 1st ed., Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547
Zhang, Nina N. “The Syntactic Derivations of Two Paired Dependency Constructions.” Lingua, vol. 117, 2007, pp. 2134-2158. Lingua, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marian Alves-Castro, Azler García-Palomino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
