Female Unpersons: Feminist Ambiguities in Sandra Newman’s "Julia"

Réka Törzsök

doi:10.18172/jes.6897

Authors

Réka Törzsök University of Debrecen https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9218-2862

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.6897

Keywords:

Sandra Newman, Orwell, 1984, feminism, ethics, intersubjectivity

Abstract

Sandra Newman’s Julia (2023) represents a new approach among the rewritings of George Orwell’s 1984 (1949). A retelling of Orwell’s dystopia from the perspective of Winston Smith’s love interest, Newman’s novel interrogates 1984’s representation of women. It is fundamentally feminist in tone, in that it gives voice to an underutilised female character, while also making it clear that the society imagined by Orwell is almost inevitably misogynistic inasmuch as it devalues, degrades, and prohibits personal relationships, erasing the very sphere that is traditionally female. In this respect, a key moment occurs when Newman’s Julia herself acknowledges that, under patriarchy, women are by definition “unpersons”—an Orwellian term referring to the erased identities produced by torture. This paper seeks to explore an inherent contradiction in the rewriting’s relationship to Orwell’s original, focusing on how, through Julia’s character, Newman’s novel navigates the ambiguity surrounding the possibility of a viable “female” world and ethics within Oceania’s patriarchal system which rigidly confines women to specific roles and positions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahams, W. (1983). Nineteen Eighty-Four: The book. In P. Stansky (Ed.), On Nineteen Eighty-Four (pp. 2–8). W. H. Freeman and Co.

Akram, H. (2024). A feminist retelling of Nineteen Eighty-Four or fanfiction? The Orwell Society Journal, 24, 42–44.

Beddoe, D. (1984). Hindrances and help-meets: Women in the writings of George Orwell. In C. Norris (Ed.), Inside the myth—Orwell: Views from the left (pp. 139–154). Lawrence and Wishart.

Bényei, T. (2009). Az ártatlan ország: Az angol regény 1945 után [The innocent country: The English novel after 1945]. Debrecen University Press. (Original work published 2003)

Bényei, T. (2023). Feminizmus és posztfeminizmus a közelmúlt irodalmában [Feminism and postfeminism in recent literature]. In T. Bényei, I. D. Rácz, & J. Friedrich (Eds.), Az angol irodalom története 7.: 1930-tól napjainkig, 2. rész [The history of English literature 7.: From the 1930s to the present, part 2] (pp. 247–284). Kijárat Kiadó. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69706/PP.2024.2.1.17

Blakemore, S. (1984). Language and ideology in Orwell’s 1984. Social Theory and Practice, 10(3), 349–356. www.jstor.org/stable/23556571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract198410316

Campbell, B. (1984). Orwell—Paterfamilias or Big Brother? In C. Norris (Ed.), Inside the myth—Orwell: Views from the left (pp. 126–138). Lawrence and Wishart.

Carpentier, M. C. (2014). The “dark power of destiny” in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 47(1), 179–194. www.jstor.org/stable/44030134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2014.0010

Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520924086

Connors, J. (1970). “Do it to Julia”: Thoughts on Orwell’s 1984. Modern Fiction Studies, 16(4), 463–473. www.jstor.org/stable/26279230

Cox, D., & Levine, M. P. (2022). Good hate. In N. Birondo (Ed.), The moral psychology of hate (pp. 165–183). Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881817923.ch-8

Crick, B. (2007). Nineteen Eighty-Four: Context and controversy. In J. Rodden (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to George Orwell (pp. 146–159). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521858429.012

Diprose, R. (2005). The bodies of women: Ethics, embodiment and sexual difference. Routledge. (Original work published 1994) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981061

Easthope, A. (1984). Fact and fantasy in Nineteen Eighty-Four. In C. Norris (Ed.), Inside the myth—Orwell: Views from the left (pp. 263–285). Lawrence and Wishart.

Feder, L. (1983). Selfhood, language, and reality: George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The Georgia Review, 37(2), 392–409. www.jstor.org/stable/41398529

Foertsch, J. (2007). Conflict and counterpoint in lesbian, gay and feminist studies. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604162

Gilligan, C. (2003). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1982)

Good, G. (1984). “Ingsoc in relation to chess”: Reversible opposites in Orwell’s 1984. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, 18(1), 50–63. www.jstor.org/stable/1346017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1346017

Kouachi, R. (2022). The advantages of rewriting and decentering classical literary works. Humanization Journal for Researches and Studies, 13(2), 227–242. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/208646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46217/1065-013-002-015

Large, W. (2016, August 29). Levinas on the difference between morality and ethics—Lecture 7. Dr. William Large Lectures. https://drwilliamlarge.wordpress.com/ 2016/08/29/levinas-on-the-difference-between-morality-and-ethics-lecture-7

Lévinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.

Lévinas, E. (1999). Entre nous: On thinking-of-the-other (M. B. Smith & B. Harshav, Trans.). The Athlone Press.

Maczelka, Cs. (2024, June 8). Menetelés a kárhozatba (Sandra Newman: Julia) [Walking into doom with both eyes open (Sandra Newman: Julia)]. 1749. https://1749.hu/fuggo/kritika/meneteles-a-karhozatba-sandra-newman-julia.html

Maczelka, Cs. (2026). Young adult dystopia, intertextuality, and biblical hope in Sandra Newman’s Julia. Anafora: Časopis za znanost o književnosti, 13(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.29162/ANAFORA.v13i1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29162/ANAFORA.v13i1.1

Mellor, A. (1983). You’re only a rebel from the waist downwards: Orwell’s view on women. In P. Stansky (Ed.), On Nineteen Eighty-Four (pp. 115–125). W. H. Freeman and Co.

Newman, S. (2023a). Afterword. In Orwell, G., Nineteen Eighty-Four (75th anniversary ed., pp. 313–321). Signet Classics. (Original work published 1949)

Newman, S. (2023b). Julia (E-book ed.). Mariner Books.

Norris, C. (Ed.). (1984). Inside the myth—Orwell: Views from the left. Lawrence and Wishart.

Nussbaum, M. (1996). Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. In J. Cohen (Ed.), For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism (pp. 2–17). Beacon Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2016). Anger and forgiveness: Resentment, generosity, justice. Oxford University Press.

Orwell, G. (2009). Nineteen Eighty-Four (60th anniversary ed.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1949)

Önvural, S. (2025). A gynocritical analysis of Newman’s Julia as a response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera, 35(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736

Parrinder, P. (1981). Updating Orwell: Burgess’s future fictions. Encounter, 56(1), 45–53.

Patai, D. (1982). Gamesmanship and androcentrism in Orwell’s 1984. PMLA, 97(5), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/462176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/462176

Rebei, M. (2004). A different kind of circularity: From writing and reading to rereading and rewriting. LISA e-Journal: Literature, history of ideas, images and societies of the English-speaking world, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.4000/lisa.2895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/lisa.2895

Scaltsas, P. W. (1992). Do feminist ethics counter feminist aims? In E. B. Cole & S. Coultrap-McQuinn (Eds.), Explorations in feminist ethics: Theory and practise (pp. 15–26). Indiana University Press.

Stewart, A. (2004). George Orwell, doubleness, and the value of decency. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203489529

Tessman, L. (2017). When doing the right thing is impossible. Oxford University Press.

Thorp, M. R. (1984). The dynamics of terror in Orwell’s 1984. Brigham Young University Studies, 24(1), 3–17. www.jstor.org/stable/43041004

Törzsök, R. (2024a). Reimagining Oceania from Julia’s point of view. The Orwell Society Journal, 24, 44–46.

Törzsök, R. (2024b). Strange intimacy: Spirituality and intersubjective relations in Orwell’s 1984. Brno Studies in English, 50(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2024-2-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2024-2-10

Törzsök, R. (in press). The paradoxes of torture in Orwell’s 1984. Atlantis, 49(2).

Tyner, J. A. (2004). Self and space, resistance and discipline: A Foucauldian reading of George Orwell’s 1984. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000137966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000137966

Van der Merwe, W., & De Voss, V. (2008). The ethics of responsibility: The ethical philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Acta Academica, 40(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v40i1.1161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v40i1.1161