The effects of orthography on the pronunciation of English “j” and “g” by CLIL and EFL Spanish schoolchildren
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.7293Keywords:
Orthographic effects (OEs), pronunciation, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), young learners, L2 EnglishAbstract
This study intended to provide empirical evidence on the occurrence of orthographic effects (OEs) on Spanish schoolchildren’s English speech production, with a special focus on the potential mitigating effects of extended exposure in the form of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as compared to traditional English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. Participants completed a word–reading–aloud task which included six words containing the graphemes “j” and “g” in onset and/or coda position. Results showed that learners were largely influenced by their L1 orthographic knowledge when producing the target grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs). However, intergroup comparisons pointed to an advantage of CLIL learners over their EFL counterparts in most words, which reached statistical significance only for the initial “j” in “jam”, suggesting that gains were word specific. The attested moderate benefits of CLIL warrant further longitudinal research of other potentially problematic GPCs for Spanish young learners of English.
Downloads
References
Azpilicueta-Martínez, R. (2024). Exposure or age? The effect of additional CLIL instruction on young learners’ grammatical complexity while performing an oral task. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241303250
Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.07bas
Bassetti, B. (2007). Effects of hanyu pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In A. Guder, X. Jiang & Y. Wan (Eds.), The cognition, learning and teaching of Chinese characters (pp. 156-179). Beijing Language and Culture University Press. http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/528/
Bassetti, B. (2008). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 191-206). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691118-013
Bassetti, B. (2023). Effects of orthography on second language phonology: Learning, awareness, perception and production. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780429343117
Bassetti, B. (2024). Orthographic effects in the phonetics and phonology of second language learners and users. In M. Amengual (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual phonetics and phonology (pp. 699-720). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105767.032
Bassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000435
Bassetti, B., Cerni, T., & Masterson, J. (2022). The efficacy of grapheme-phoneme correspondence instruction in reducing the effect of orthographic forms on second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 683-705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642200008X
Bassetti, B., Escudero, P., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000393
Brown, K. E. (2015). The influence of explicit instruction on failure to acquire a phonological rule due to orthographic input: The case of native English speakers learning German [Master’s thesis]. University of Utah. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1765694951/
Bürki, A., Welby, P., Clément, M., & Spinelli, E. (2019). Orthography and second language word learning: Moving beyond “friend or foe?” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(4), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5094923
Cerni, T., Bassetti, B., & Masterson, J. (2019). Effects of orthographic forms on the acquisition of novel spoken words in a second language. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00031
Cobb, T. (2026). Vocabprofile compleat kids. The Compleat Lexical Tutor. https://www.lextutor.ca/vp/kids/
Cook, V. J., & Bassetti, B. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In V. J. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 1-67). Multilingual Matters.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Bauer-Marschallinger, S. (2023). L2 proficiency and development in CLIL. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 112-126). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151-11
Detey, S., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2008). Can orthography influence second language syllabic segmentation?: Japanese epenthetic vowels and French consonantal clusters. Lingua, 118, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.04.003
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2014). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000436
Escudero, P., & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53(3), 343-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910371447
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2005). La adquisición de la pronunciación del Inglés como tercera lengua [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Fernández-Pena, Y. (2024). On the effect of CLIL intensity on the agreement morphology errors and null subjects of young learners of English. In A. Montoya-Reyes, A. Barsaglini Castro, & E. Sánchez Barreiro (Eds.), A multidisciplinary approach to applied linguistics and education: Building knowledge in foreign language teaching, translation, critical discourse analysis and posthumanism (pp. 11-34). Peter Lang.
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. G., & Friedman, K. (2013). On the pronunciation of L2 English word-final consonant clusters in monomorphemic vs. inflected words. In R. Arias, M. López-Rodríguez, A. Moreno-Ortiz, & C. Pérez-Hernández (Eds.), Hopes and fears: English and American studies in Spain (pp. 226-231). Universidad de Málaga.
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Gómez-Lacabex, E. (2017). Oral production outcomes in CLIL: An attempt to manage amount of exposure. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2015-0035
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Gómez-Lacabex, E. (2024). A longitudinal exploration of perception and production of English codas in CLIL settings. Languages (9), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090303
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., Gómez-Lacabex, E., & García-Lecumberri, M. L. (2009). Testing the effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz-de-Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez-Catalán (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 63-80). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/ 10.21832/9781847691675-007
Hayes-Harb, R., & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 54(3), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000658
Hayes-Harb, R., Brown, K., & Smith, B. (2018). Orthographic input and the acquisition of German final devoicing by native speakers of English. Language and Speech, 61(4), 547-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917710048
Keshavarz, M. H., & Keshavarz, A. (2022). The effect of L2 input on young learners’ pronunciation performance in English. Mextesol Journal, 46(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v46n3-4
Machuca, M. J. (1997). Las obstruyentes no continuas del español: Relación entre las categorías fonéticas y fonológicas en habla espontánea [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J. (2015). Is CLIL instruction beneficial in terms of general proficiency and specific areas of grammar? Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.03adr
Martínez-García, M. T. (2023). Orthographic effects in word recognition among Spanish-speaking learners of English. Langues & Parole, 8, 127-148. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/languesparole.131
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12177
Navarro Tomás, T. (1967). Manual de pronunciación española. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Instituto “Miguel de Cervantes.” https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1971712334703455683
Pérez-Cañado, M., & Lancaster, N. (2017). The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: A longitudinal case study. Language Culture and Curriculum, 30, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717
Poveda-Garcia-Noblejas, B., & Antropova, S. (2024). Analysis of CLIL-related research in school settings: A systematic review. Journal of Language and Education, 10(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.18150
Pytlyk, C. (2016). Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000175
Rallo-Fabra, L., & Jacob, K. (2015). Does CLIL enhance oral skills? Fluency and pronunciation errors by Spanish-Catalan learners of English. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 163-177). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_10
Rallo-Fabra, L., & Juan-Garau, M. (2011). Assessing FL pronunciation in a semi-immersion setting: The effects of CLIL instruction on Spanish-Catalan learners’ perceived comprehensibility and accentedness. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0008
Showalter, C. E. (2018). Orthographic input familiarity and congruence effects on phono-lexical acquisition of Russian by native speakers of English [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Utah. https://www.proquest.com/ openview/2ac785e27dab19e728231fa00ccc57cf/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar
Showalter, C. E. (2020). Russian phono-lexical acquisition and orthographic input: Naïve learners, experienced learners and interventions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000585
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313480154
Sola Prado, A. (2011). Las aproximantes [β, δ, γ] del español en habla espontánea. Phonica, 7, 118-140.
Stoehr, A., & Martin, C. (2022). Orthography affects L1 and L2 speech perception but not production in early bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25, 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000523
Vokic, G. (2011). When alphabets collide: Alphabetic first-language speakers’ approach to speech production in an alphabetic second language. Second Language Research, 27(3), 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310396627
Zampini, M. L. (1994). The role of native language transfer and task formality in the acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Hispania, 77(3), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/344974
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Déborath Sánchez-Fernández, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License






