Mary Reilly as Jekyll or Hyde : Neo-Victorian (re)creations of Feminity and Feminism

Authors

  • Marta Miquel Baldellou University of Lleida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.154

Keywords:

Neo-Victorian, femininity, feminism, Victorian gothic romance, postmodernism, critical f(r)iction

Abstract

In his article “What is Neo-Victorian Studies?” (2008), Mark Lewellyn argues that the term neo-Victorian fiction refers to works that are consciously set in the Victorian period, but introduce representations of marginalised voices, new histories of sexuality, post-colonial viewpoints and other generally ‘different’ versions of the Victorian era. Valerie Martin’s gothic-romance Mary Reilly drew on Stevenson’s novella to introduce a woman’s perspective on the puzzle of Jekyll and Hyde. Almost twenty-years after the publication of Martin’s novel, the newly established field of research in Neo-Victorian fiction has questioned the extent to which Neo-Victorian recreations of the Victorian past respond to postmodern contemporary reflections and ideas about the period. This article aims to examine the ways in which this Neo-Victorian gothic text addresses both the issues of Victorian femininity and feminist principles now in the light of later Neo-Victorian precepts, taking into consideration that Martin’s novel introduces a woman’s perspective as a feminist response to Stevenson’s text but also includes many allusions to the cult of domesticity as a legacy of the Victorian gothic romance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bronte, Charlotte. 1996 (1847). Jane Eyre. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.

Chase, Karen and Michael Levenson. 2005. “On the Parapets of Privacy”. A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture. Ed. Herbert F. Tucker. Oxford: Blackwell. 425-437.

Gilbert, Sandra, and Susan Gubar. 2000 (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Joyce, Simon. 2002. “The Victorians in the Rearview Mirror”. Functions of Victorian Culture at the Present Time. Ed. Christine L. Krueger. Ohio: Ohio University Press.

Kaplan, Cora. 2007. Victoriana: Histories, Fiction, Criticism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Kucich, John and Dianne F. Sadoff, eds. 2000. Victorian Afterlives: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth-Century. London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lepine, Anna. 2009. “Hyde and Seek in an Age of Surveillance: Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde and the BBC’s Jekyll”. Neo-Victorian Studies 1.2 (Winter): 78-102.

Light, Alison. 1997.“‘Returning to Manderley’: Romance Fiction, Female Sexuality and Class”. Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed. B. Ashley. 222-226.

Llewellyn, Mark. 2008. “What is Neo-Victorian Studies?” Neo-Victorian Studies 1.1 (Autumn): 164-185.

Martin, Valerie. 2003 (1990). Mary Reilly. London: Abacus.

Michie, Helena. 2005. “Under Victorian Skins: The Bodies Beneath”. A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture. Ed. Herbert F. Tucker. Oxford: Blackwell. 407-424.

Rank, Otto. 1997. “The Double: A Psychoanalytical Study” (1914). Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed. Bob Ashley. London and Washington: Leicester University Press. 164-166.

Showalter, Elaine. 1986. “Towards a Feminist Poetics”. The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory. Ed. Elaine Showalter. London: Virago. 125-143.

Stevenson, Robert Louis. 1994 (1886). The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde. London: Penguin Popular Classics.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2010

How to Cite

Miquel Baldellou, M. (2010). Mary Reilly as Jekyll or Hyde : Neo-Victorian (re)creations of Feminity and Feminism. Journal of English Studies, 8, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.154

Issue

Section

Articles