Aphorisms and Philosophy : Contextualizing Aphoristic Texts-Assumptions about Subject-Matter

Marco A. Ángel Lara

Abstract


This article analyses two current beliefs about the subject matter and the text-context relation of aphorisms. It is a commonly claimed that aphorisms are philosophical texts and that aphorisms are texts that function in isolation from any context. My hypothesis is that, instead of being descriptions of textual features, these beliefs act as conventions that prepare the field of reference for contextualizing texts and thus trigger a proper generic reading for certain kinds of aphoristic text. By helping to demystify some of the technical means of aphoristic writing (whose results are frequently described as concentrated or distilled wisdom), this hypothesis will highlight the importance of allusiveness for the current mainstream of aphorisms,. From the perspective of this article, aphorisms appear more as certain kinds of textual parasites, feeding off ‘contextual wisdom’, rather than being philosophical pills from the “wisdom of the ages”.

Keywords


Philosophy; literature; genre theory; cultural studies; aphorisms

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atlas, D. 2005. “The Craft of Aphorism: Philosophy above the Book”. Skandalon. Journal of Theory, 1 (1): 50-72.

Auden, W. H. and Louis Kronenberger 1964. The Faber Book of Aphorisms: A Personal Selection. London: Faber and Faber.

Bacon, Francis (1869). The Advancement of Learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Baldick, Chris 1990. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barthes, R. (1972). “La Rochefoucauld: Réflexions ou Sentences et Maximes”. Le degré zéro de l’écriture 1953, suivi de Nouveaux essais critiques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Cuddon, J. A. 1977. A Dictionary of Literary Terms. London: Deutsch.

Déchery, Laurent 1995. “Réflexions sur l’ aphorisme et la maxime à l’âge classique”. Romance Quarterly 42.1: 3-17.

Duff, David 2000. Modern Genre Theory. Longman Critical Readers. Harlow: Longman.

Eco, Umberto (2004). “Wilde. Paradox and Aphorism”. On Literature. Orlando: Harcourt.

Eco, Umberto (2002). “Wilde. Paradosso e aforisma”. Sulla Letteratura, Milano: Soggi Bompiani.

Fenton, James 2007. “On the Difficult Art of the Aphorism”. Guardian 17.02.2007 2007, sec. Review: 15.

Foucault, Michel (1988). Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984. London: Routledge.

Fowler, Roger (1996). Linguistic Criticism. 2nd ed ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fruchtl, Josef 1997. “The Aphorism as a Stylistic and Epistemological Ideal: Theodor W. Adorno and Botho Straus”. REAL 13: 161-73.

García Hernández, Arturo 2005. “El Aforismo es malo si se plantea como máxima incuestionable”. La Jornada 2005, 10/ 20/ 2005 ed., http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2005/10/30/a08n1cul.php (Accessed 22/03/2007).

Geary, James 2005. The World in a Phrase: A Brief History of the Aphorism. 1st U.S. ed. New York: Bloomsbury.

Gross, J. 1983. The Oxford Book of Aphorisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lang, Berel. 1980. “Towards a Poetics of Philosophical Discourse”. The Monist 63: 445-64.

La Rochefoucauld, Francois de (2001). Maxims. Tr. by Stuart D. Warner, and Stéphane Douard, South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine's Press.

Lec, S. Jerzy 1962. Unkempt Thoughts. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Lewis, Philip E. 1977. La Rochefoucauld: The Art of Abstraction. London: Cornell University Press.

Mansfield, S. 2004. “Hard lines with a Slow burn”. The Scotman, 24/01/2004 ed., http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/s2.cfm?id=87272004 (Accessed 12/06/2005).

Martinez-Conde, Ricardo. 1999. “El aforismo o la formulación de la duda”, Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos, 586.4: 77-88.

May, Simon 2005. The Little Book of Big Thoughts: A Handbook of Aphorisms. London: John Blake Publishing.

Morson, Gary Saul 2006. “The Rhetoric of the Aphorism”. Walter Jost and Wendy Olmsted (Eds.). A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

Munné, Frederic 2001. “El declive del postmodernismo y el porvenir de la psicología”. Cinta de Moebio 10.

Nietzsche, Friedrich 1998. Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich 1977. A Nietzsche Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pagliaro, Harold E. 1964. “Paradox in the Aphorisms of La Rochefoucauld and Some Representative English Followers”. PMLA 79.1: 42-50.

Pavarini, Stefano 1996. “Frammento e aforisma: ipotesi per una classificazione critica”. Lingua e Stile 31.4: 565-84.

Pearsall, Judy, Ed. (2002). Concise Oxford English Dictionary. 10th ed: Oxford University Press.

Porchia, Antonio (2003). Voices. Tr. by W. S. Merwin, Port Townsend, Washington, Copper Canyon Press.

Smith, L. P. 1928. Treasury of English Aphorisms. London: Constable.

Stern, Joseph Peter 1963. Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions, Reconstructed from His Aphorisms and Reflections. London: Thames & Hudson.

Wales, Katie 2001. A Dictionary of Stylistics. Studies in Language and Linguistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.

Williams, Raymond 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Fontana Paperbacks, London.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2002). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge.

Wolf, Manfred 1994. “The Aphorism”. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 51.4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.158

Copyright (c) 2011 Marco A. Ángel Lara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© Universidad de La Rioja, 2013

ISSN 1576-6357

EISSN 1695-4300