Reassessing John Steinbeck’s modernism: myth, ritual, and a land full of ghosts in “To a God Unknown”




John Steinbeck, Modernism, myth-criticism, myth and ritual, American literature, “To a God Unknown”


The aim of this paper is to reassess John Steinbeck’s presence and significance within American modernism by advancing a myth-critical reading of his early novel “To a God Unknown” (1933). Considering the interplay between this novel and the precedent literary tradition and other contextual aspects that might have influenced Steinbeck’s text, this study explores Steinbeck’s often disregarded novel as an eloquent demonstration of the malleability of myths characteristic of Anglo-American modernism. Taking myth-ritualism—the most prominent approach to myth at the time—as a critical prism to reappraise Steinbeck’s own reshaping of modernist aesthetics, this article examines recurrent frustrated and misguided ritual patterns along with the rewriting of flouted mythical motifs as a series of aesthetic choices that give shape and meaning to a state of stagnation common to the post-war American literary landscapes, but now exacerbated as it has finally spread, as a plague of perverse remythologization, to the Eden of the West.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rebeca Gualberto, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Assistant Professor at the Deptartment of English Studies of the Complutense University of Madrid. 


Adams, J. T. 1954. The Epic of America. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

Becker, U. 2000. The Continuum Encyclopedia of Symbols. London, New York: Continuum.

Bellow, S. 1965. Herzog. London: Penguin Books.

Brooks, C. Jr. 2001. “The Waste Land: An Analysis.” The Waste Land. Authorative Text, Contexts, Criticism. Ed. M. North. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company. 185-210.

Campbell, J. 2008. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Novato: New World Library.

Campbell, J. 1969. The Masks of God: Creative Mythologies. London: Penguin Books.

Dos Passos, J. 2000. Manhattan Transfer. London: Penguin Books.

Eliot, T. S. The Waste Land. Authoritative Text, Contexts and Criticism. Ed. M. North. London, New York: Norton & Company.

Eliot, T. S. 1952. “Ulysses, Order and Myth”. Critiques and Essays on Modern Fiction. 1920-1951. Representing the Achievement of Modern American and British Critics. Ed. J. W. Aldridge. New York: The Roland Press Company. 424-426.

Eschenbach, W. 1980. Parzival. Ed. Trans. A. T. Hatto. London: Penguin Books.

Fitzgerald, F. S. 1991. The Great Gatsby. London. Longman Group Limited.

Frazer, J. G. 1963. The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion. I Volume. Abridge Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

French, W. 1975. John Steinbeck. Boston: Twayne Publishers.

Frye, N. 1971. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Frye, N. 1976. The Secular Scripture. A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.

Hemingway, E. 2004. Fiesta: The Sun Also Rises. London: Arrow Books.

Hocart, A. M. 2004. The Life-Giving Myth. Oxon: Routledge.

Kermode, F. 1967. The Sense of an Ending. Studies in the Theory of Fiction. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Levenson, M. 1984. A Genealogy of Modernism. A Study of English Literary Doctrine 1908-1922. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Loomis, R. S. 1992. The Grail. From Celtic Myth to Christian Symbol. London: Constable.

Manganaro, M. 1998. “Myth as Culture: The Lesson of Anthropology in T. S. Eliot.” Myth and the Making of Modernity: The Problem of Grounding in Early Twentieth-Century Literature. Eds. M. Bell and P. Poellner. Amsterdan, Atlanta GA: Rodopi.

Meletinsky, E. M. 1998. The Poetics of Myth. Guy Lanoue and Alexandre Sadetsky, trans. London, New York: Routledge.

Meyer, K. 2004. “John Steinbeck’s Promised Lands.” Steinbeck Studies 15 (2): 75-88.

Pitt-Rivers, J. 1997. “Un ritual de sacrificio: la corrida de toros española.” Trans. P. García Souza. Alteridades 7 (13): 109-105. 131

Post, C. 1993. History’s Myth: John Steinbeck and the Twilight of Western Culture. Doctoral Dissertation in English. Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University.

Pugh, S. 2006. “Horrifying Conclusions: Making Sense of Endings in Steinbeck’s Fiction.” Steinbeck Review 3 (1): 69-83.

Segal, R. A. 1999. Theorizing About Myth. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Simkins, W. S. 2007. “Myth as Talisman: Adaptive Teleology in The Winter of Our Discontent.” Steinbeck Review 4 (2): 13-29.

Steinbeck, J. 1979. To a God Unknown. London: Heinemann.

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1955. “The Structural Study of Myth.” The Journal of American Folklore 68 (270, Myth: A Symposium): 428-444.

Tanner, Tony. 2000. The American mystery. Cambridge: CUP.

Troyes, C. (2004). Arthurian Romances. Trans. Eds. W. W. Kibler & C. W. Carroll. London: Penguin Books.

Weston, J. L. (1993). From Ritual to Romance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




How to Cite

Gualberto, R. (2018). Reassessing John Steinbeck’s modernism: myth, ritual, and a land full of ghosts in “To a God Unknown”. Journal of English Studies, 16, 113–132.