Identifying Metaphors in TV Commercials with FILMIP: The Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.4623Keywords:
Multimodality, multimodal metaphor, metaphor identification, filmic metaphor, FILMIP, advertisingAbstract
The analysis and identification of figurative language is one of the largest research areas in cognitive linguistics, and metaphor is one of these tropes. Focusing on the genre of TV advertising, a structural method for the identification of metaphorical components used in films in a cross-modal fashion is developed in the present paper. A corpus of eleven TV commercials is analyzed under seven steps that guide analysts from the content description of the multimodal materials to the concrete identification of metaphorical elements. This research presents the Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure (FILMIP, Bort-Mir 2019) as a tool for the identification of metaphorically used filmic components in multimodal filmic materials. More concretely, the paper presents the application of the procedure to two TV commercials from different perfume brands. FILMIP offers a valuable contribution not only to metaphor scholars but also to researchers focused on other fields of study such as multimodality, discourse analysis, communication, branding, or even film theory.
Downloads
References
Bort-Mir, L. 2019. Developing, Applying, and Testing FILMIP: the Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure. PhD Thesis. Universidad Jaume I: Spain.
Carroll, N. 1994. “Visual metaphor”. Aspects of metaphor. Ed. J. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Springer. 189-218.
Carroll, N. 1996a. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, N .1996b. “A note on film metaphor”. Journal of pragmatics 26(6): 809-822.
Cienki, A. and C. Müller. 2008. Metaphor and gesture (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
El Refaie, E. 2016. “Analysing metaphors in multimodal texts”. The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. Eds. E. Semino, and Z. Demjén. London: Taylor & Francis. 148-162.
Forceville, C. 2006. “Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research”. Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. Eds. G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, and F. Ruiz de Mendoza. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 379-402.
Forceville, C. 2015. “Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field”. Embodied metaphors in film, television, and video games. Ed. K. Fahlenbrach. London: Routledge. 31-46.
Forceville, C. and E. Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W. 2008. Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Lemke, J. L. 1998. “Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text”. Reading science: Critical and Functional Perspectives. Eds. J. R. Martin and R. Veel. London: Routledge. 87-113.
Müller, C. and H. Kappelhoff. 2018. Cinematic metaphor: experience–affectivity–temporality (Vol. 4). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ortony, A. 1993 (1979). Metaphor and Thought: Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, B. J. and E. F. McQuarrie. 2002. “The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954-1999”. Journal of Advertising 31(4): 1-13.
Rossolatos, G. 2014. “Conducting multimodal rhetorical analysis of TV ads with Atlas.ti 7”. Multimodal Communication 3(1): 51-84.
Šorm, E. and G. J. Steen 2013. “Processing visual metaphor: A study in thinking out loud”. Metaphor and the Social World 3(1): 1-34.
Steen, G. 1999. “Towards a linguistic checklist for metaphor analysis”. Researching & Applying Metaphor: 81-104.
Steen, G. 2007. Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research (Vol. 10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. 2009. “From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: A procedure for metaphor identification in discourse”. Cognitive Poetics. Eds. G. Brône and J. Vandaele. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 197-226.
Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. and T. Pasma. 2010. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
