From Syntax to Phraseology
A Phraseological Approach to Schematic Caused-Motion Constructions in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.5738Keywords:
Caused-motion constructions, phraseologism, teaching, get, Construction Grammar, schematic constructionsAbstract
This article presents the main grammatical characteristics of English constructions generally referred to as complex transitive constructions (Quirk et al., 1985), causative resultatives (Goldberg and Jackendoff, 2004) and caused-motion constructions (Goldberg, 1995, 2006, 2018). It is claimed, in light of some empirical corpus-based studies (Hampe, 2010; Rosa, 2020; Xia, 2017) that low-level phraseological constructions such ‘talk some sense into somebody’ play a crucial role in motivating the entrenchment and use of highly schematic caused motions such as ‘Frank sneezed the foam off the cappuccino’. In order to support this view with empirical data, we present the analysis of 1284 caused-motion utterances extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), out of which we were able to identify 12 fixed expressions and 9 statistically attested phraseologisms. At last, we discuss the implications that such relationship between grammar and phraseology may present in the understanding of schematic structures such as the caused motion.
Downloads
References
Barðdal, J. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Constructional Approaches to Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008.
Boas, H. C. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: center for the study of Language and Information.
Boas, H. C. 2013. “Cognitive Construction Grammar”. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Eds. T. Trousdale, G. Hoffmann. New York: Oxford University Press. 233-252.
Boswijk, V. and M. Coler. 2020. “What is salience?” Open Linguistics 6: 713-722.
Brezina, V. 2018. Statistics in corpus linguistics: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. and M. McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English - a Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. and D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book - an ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Croft, W. 2012. Verbs – aspect and causal structure. New York: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. 2013. Radical Construction Grammar. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Eds. T. Trousdale, G. Hoffmann. New York: Oxford University Press. 211-233.
Dancygier, B. and E. Sweetser. 2014. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Ellis, N. 2008. “Phraseology: The Periphery and the Heart of Language”. Phraseology in Language Learning and Teaching. Eds. F. Meunier and S. Granger. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 01-13.
Ellis, N. 2013. “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition”. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Eds. T. Trousdale, G. Hoffmann. New York: Oxford University Press. 15-31.
Evans, V. 2012. “Cognitive linguistics”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3: 129.
Fillmore, C. 1968. “The case for case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory. Eds. E. Bach and R. Hams. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. 1-88.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P. and M. O'Connor. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone”. Language 64: 501-538.
Gawron, J. M. 1986. “Situations and prepositions”. Linguist Philos 9: 327-382.
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. 2003. “Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219-224.
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Goldberg, A. E. 2013. “Constructionist approaches”. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Eds. T. Trousdale, G. Hoffmann. New York: Oxford University Press. 15-32.
Goldberg, A. E. 2019. Explain me this: creativity, competition, and partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. and R. Jackendoff. 2004. “The resultative as a family of constructions”. Language 80: 532-568.
Grady, J. E. 1997. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Gries, S. 2006. “Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: the many meanings of to run”. Corpora in cognitive linguistics: corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Eds. S. Gries and A. Stefanowitsch. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 57-99.
Gries, S. 2008. “Phraseology and linguistic theory: a brief survey”. Phraseology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds. F. Meunier and S. Granger. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3-25.
Gries, S. 2012. “Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/ psycholinguistics: towards more and more fruitful exchanges”. Corpus linguistics and variation in English: Theory and description. Eds. J. Mukherjee and M. Hurber. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 41-63.
Hampe, B. 2010. “Metaphor, constructional ambiguity and the causative resultatives”. Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Eds. S. Handl and H. J. Schmid. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 185-215.
Israel, M. 2004. How children get Constructions. http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~israel/ Israel-GetConstructs.pdf
Jiang, C. and W. Xu. 2022. Constructional network at work in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7/12: 1-16.
Lakoff, G. 1991. “Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results”. Language & Communication, 11 (1/2): 53-62.
Langacker, R. 2013. Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T. and A. Hardie. 2012. Corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moon, R. 1998. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pustejovsky, J. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41(1-3): 47-81.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and J. Svartvik. 1986. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Edinburgh: Longman.
Reddy, M. 1979. The Conduit Metaphor: a Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language. Metaphor and Thought. Ed. A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, R. G. 2014. Fraseologia do verbo get na língua inglesa: uma abordagem da Linguística de Corpus e da Gramática de Construções. Master’s thesis. University of São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.8.2014.tde-03112014-165540
Rosa, R. G. and S. E. O. Tagnin. 2015. “Mapeamento construcional e fraseológico do verbo get: uma abordagem baseada na Linguística de Corpus e na Gramática de Construções Cognitiva”. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia 9 (1): 75-104. https://doi.org/10.14393/DL17-v9n1a2015-5
Rosa, R. G. 2020. Caused-motion constructions in learner English corpora: from observation to experimentation. PhD Dissertation. University of Sao Paulo. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2020.tde-21092020-174719
Rosa, R. G. 2023. Take the plunge: Using phraseology to enhance learners’ knowledge of grammar. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal 14 (1), e44041. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2023.1.44041
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmid, H. 2010. “Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system?” Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Eds. D. Glynn and K. Fisher. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 101-135.
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A. and M. Perkins. 2000. “The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model”. Language & Communication, 20 (1): 1-28.
Wulff, S. 2008. Rethinking Idiomaticity: A Usage-based Approach. London: Continuum.
Xia, X. 2017. “Verb Class-Specific Caused-Motion Constructions”. Chinese Semiotic Studies 13 (3): 269-287.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Rosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
