Logical Operators in Local and International English Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: An Interactive Clause Complexing Analysis

Alireza Jalilifar; Zahra Alishahi; Alexanne Don

doi:10.18172/jes.6532

Authors

Alireza Jalilifar Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-6757
Zahra Alishahi Islamic Azad University of Gachsaran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5446-2065
Alexanne Don UNSW Sydney https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-5356

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.6532

Keywords:

Clause complexing, Coherence, Explicitness, Interactive information structure, Logical operators

Abstract

This corpus-based study provides a contrastive insight into the interactive influence of logical operators on clause complexing in local and international English journals in applied linguistics from the systemic functional linguistic perspective. The data comprised 320 method sections of research articles in international and local journals from 2016 to 2022. Following Halliday’s clause complexing pattern, the logico-semantic relations between clause nexuses were coded as simplex, paratactic, or hypotactic clauses and were contrastively analyzed. The results revealed a distinct difference between local and international authors in applying logical operators in simplex and complex clauses and navigating readers’ interpretation patterns. The qualitative analysis attributed this distinct difference to complex, explicit, and reader-oriented information structure which contributed to the fact that maintaining coherence through discourse markers requires the application of adept interactive clause complexing strategies. The cognitive and interactive functions of logical operators shape the systemic selection of clause complexes to optimize the presentation of information for a specific, non-present audience. The findings of this study may assist academic writing teachers in explicitly instructing novice academic authors to employ logical operators proficiently in simplex and complex clauses and manage interactive information structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, Alison L., and Margaret Heritage, editors. Formative Assessment for Literacy, Grades K-6: Building Reading and Academic Language Skills Across the Curriculum. Corwin press, 2008.

Baklouti, Akila Sellami. “The Impact of Genre and Disciplinary Differences on Structural Choice: Taxis in Research Article Abstracts.” Text and Talk, vol. 31, no. 5, 2011, pp. 503-523. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.025

Barker, Ken. Clause-level Relationship Analysis in the TANKA System. TR-9407. Computer Science Department, University of Ottawa, 1994.

Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. “Challenging Stereotypes about Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 9, 2010, pp. 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001

Bruce, Ian. “Cognitive Genre Structures in Methods Sections of Research Articles: A Corpus Study.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 7, no. 1, 2008, pp. 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001

Burrough-Boenisch, Joy. “Shapers of Published NNS Research Articles.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol 12, no 3, 2003, pp. 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060 3743(03)00037-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00037-7

Butt, David, Rhondda Fahey, Susan Feez, Sue Spinks, and Colin Yallop. Using Functional Grammar. Macquarie University, 1999.

Coffin, Caroline, and James P. Donohue. “Academic Literacies and Systemic Functional Linguistics: How Do They Relate?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol 11, no 1, 2012, pp. 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004

Datchuk, Shawn. M, and Richard. M Kubina. “A Review of Teaching Sentence-level Writing Skills to Students with Writing Difficulties and Learning Disabilities.” Remedial and Special Education, vol. 34, no. 3, 2013, pp. 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448254

Eggins, Suzan. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. A&C Black, 2004.

Gerot, Linda, and Peter Wignell. Making Sense of Functional Grammar: An Introductory Workbook. Queensland, 1994.

Graham, Steve. “Writing.” Handbook of Educational Psychology, edited by Alexander, Patricia A., and Philip H. Winne. 2006, pp. 457–477.

Halliday, Michael. Language as a Social Semiotic. Edward Arnold, 1978.

Halliday, Michael and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Oxford University Press, 1985.

Halliday, Michael, and Christian Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, 2004.

Hart, Christopher. Discourse, Grammar, and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.

Hawes, Thomas. “Thematic Progression in the Writing of Students and Professionals.” Ampersand, vol. 2, 2015, pp. 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002

Hawes, Thomas, and Sarah Thomas. “Theme choice in EAP and media language.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 11, no. 3, 2012, pp. 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.005

Hyland, Ken. “Persuasion in Academic Articles.” Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 2, 1999, pp. 73-103.

Hyland, Ken. Genre and Second Language Writing. University of Michigan Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927

Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: a Reappraisal.” Applied linguistics, vol. 25, no. 2, 2004, pp. 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Jagaiah, Thilagha, Natalie G. Olinghouse, and Devin M. Kearns. “Syntactic Complexity Measures: Variation by Genre, Grade-level, Students’ Writing Abilities, and Writing Quality.” Reading and Writing, vol. 33, 2020, 2577-2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x

Jaroongkhongdach, Woravut, Richard Watson Todd, Sonthida Keyuravong, and David Hall. “Differences in Quality between Thai and International Research Articles in ELT.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 11, no. 3, 2012, pp. 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.006

Jiang, Feng Kevin, and Ken Hyland. “Nouns and Academic Interactions: A Neglected Feature of Metadiscourse.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 4, 2018, pp. 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw023

Khedri, Mohsen, and Konstantinos Kritsis. “Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics and Chemistry Research Article Introductions.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, vol. 9, no. 2, 2018, pp. 47-73. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13793

Lehman, Christian. “Towards a typology of clause linkage.” Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, edited by John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson, 1988, pp. 181-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh

Leong, Alvin Ping, and Geok Wee Bee. “Investigating the Clause Complex: An Analysis of Exposition-type Essays Written by Secondary School Students in Singapore.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 149, no. 1, 2005, pp. 47-76. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004372

Leong, Alvin. “Writing in the Sciences and Humanities: A Clause-complex Perspective.” Word, vol. 67, no. 2, 2021, pp. 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1909866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1909866

Li, Xueying, and Hailing Yu. “Parataxis or Hypotaxis? Choices of Taxis in Chinese-English Translation.” Lingua, vol. 251, 2021, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103026

McNamara, Tim. “Validity and Values: Inferences in Language Testing.” Inference and Generalizability in Applied Linguistics: Multiple Perspectives, edited by Micheline Chalhoub-Deville, Carol A. Chappell, and Particia Duff. 2006, pp. 27-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.12.04mac

Ngongo, Magdalena. “Taxis and Logico-Semantic Relation in Undergraduate Students’ English Theses Writing Text: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach.” Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, vol. 2, 2018, pp. 146-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v9i2/19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v9i2/19

Rashidi, Narges, and Golnar Mazdayasna. “Impact of genre-based instruction on development of students’ letter writing skills: The case of students of textile engineering.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, vol. 7, no. (2), 2016, pp. 55-72. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2016.12094

Rukmini, Dwi. “The Quality of Clause Complexes in Articles Abstracts Written by Semarang State University Graduate Students.” The New English Teacher, vol. 8, no. 1, 2014, pp. 121-131.

Scardamalia, Marlene, and Bereiter Carl. “Adaptation and Understanding: A Case for New Cultures of Schooling.” International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-supported Learning Environments, edited by Stella Vosniadou, Erik De Corte, Robert Glaser, Heinz Mandl, 1996, pp. 149–163.

Sergueevna Andrianova, Natalia, Olga Fedorovna Ostroumova, Elena Anatolyevna Vanchikova, and Elena Anatolyevna Аndreeva. “Syntax and Syntactic Concept in the Structure of English Language.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 3, 2023, pp. 365-368. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.19568

Sinclair, John M. “Written Discourse Structure.” Techniques of Description, edited by John M. Sinclair, Michael Hoey, and Gwyneth Fox, 1993, pp. 6-31.

Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber, and Bethany Gray. “Academic Writing Development at the University Level: Phrasal and Clausal Complexity across Level of Study, Discipline, and Genre.” Written Communication, vol. 33, no. 2, 2016, pp. 149-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527

Swain, Merrill. “Verbal Protocol: What does it Mean for Research to Use Speaking as a Data Collection Tool?” Inference and Generalizability in Applied Linguistics: Multiple Perspectives, edited by Micheline Chalhoub-Deville, Carol A. Chappell, and Particia Duff. 2006, pp. 97-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.12.07swa

Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. 3rd ed. Michigan UP, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936

Thompson, Sandra A. “Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, vol. 5, no. 1-2, 1985, pp. 55-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.1-2.55

Thompson, Geoff. “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 22, no. 1, 2001, pp. 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58

Thompson, Geoff. Introducing functional grammar. Arnold, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270

Wei, Jing. “Thematic choice in Chinese college students' English essays.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 41, 2016, pp. 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003

Wingate, Ursula. “Using Academic Literacies and Genre-based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’ Journey.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 11, 2012, pp. 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006

Winter, Eugene. Towards a Contextual Grammar of English: The Clause and its Place in the Definition of Sentence, Routledge, 1982.

Winter, Eugene. “Clause Relation as Information Structure, two Basic Text Structures in English.” Advances in Written Text Analysis, edited by Malcolm Coulthard, 1994, pp. 46-88.

Yang, Qian, J. Andrés Ramírez, and Ruth Harman. “EFL Chinese Students and High Stakes Expository Writing: A Theme Analysis.” Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, vol. 9, 2007, pp. 99-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.3147

Zhang, Xian. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Second Language Acquisition between 1997 and 2018.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 42, no. 1, 2020, pp. 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573

Zuengler, Jane, and Heather Carroll. Reﬂections on the Steady Increase in Submissions Commentary from the Co-editor and Editor’s Assistant of Applied Linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, vol. 94, 2010, pp. 637–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01096.x