Mimesis of Contrast in Shakespeare's Ephemeral Subplot and its Use in Victorian and Modernist Literature

Antonio Jiménez Hernando

doi:10.18172/jes.5770

Authors

Antonio Jiménez Hernando Universidad Complutense de Madrid / University of Groningen https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1302-9659

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.5770

Keywords:

Shakespeare, Literary Criticism, Victorian Literature, Modernism, Comparative Literature

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an overview of Shakespeare’s employment of a narrative technique that could be referred to as the “mimesis of contrast.” By analysing the characteristics of certain sequences in Macbeth, Henry IV 1 and The Tempest, it will be spelt out that Shakespeare’s sudden subplots, generally considered mere comic reliefs, are in fact revealing instances that not only mirror the play’s primary narrative but also succeed in generating a drastic poetic effect. Moreover, the use of this method will be considered in the works of Victorian and Modernist authors, notably Charles Dickens, James Joyce and T. S. Eliot. Lastly, the ideas of traditional Shakespearian critics like S. T. Coleridge and Thomas De Quincey shall work as central arguments in this article, aiding to conclude that Renaissance drama, and in particular Shakespeare’s motif of contrast, made an impact in the literature of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, Michael J. B. “Macbeth’s Genial Porter.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 4, no. 3, 1974, pp. 326–336. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43446807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6757.1974.tb01305.x

Berger, Harry. “A Horse Named Cut: 1 Henry IV, Act 2, Scene 1.” Harrying: Skills of Offense in Shakespeare’s Henriad, Fordham University Press, 2015, pp. 83–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1657v3c.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823256624.003.0006

Bowers, Fredson. “Theme and Structure in King Henry IV Part I.” The Drama of the Renaissance: Essays for Leicester Bradner, edited by Elmer B, Brown UP, 1970, pp. 42-68.

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Lecture 1: Thursday, 17 December 1818 (The Tempest).” Lectures on Shakespeare (1811-1819), edited by Adam Roberts, Edinburgh University Press, 2016 (1818), pp. 132–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g052m3.14

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “Lecture 4: Thursday, 14 January 1819 (Macbeth).” Lectures on Shakespeare (1811-1819), edited by Adam Roberts, Edinburgh University Press, 2016 (1818) pp. 154–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g052m3.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474413787.001.0001

Collington, Philip D. “‘Graze, as You Find Pasture’: Nebuchadnezzar and the Fate of Cymbeline’s Prisoners.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 53 no. 3, 2002, pp. 291–322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3844342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2003.0004

De Quincey, Thomas. “On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth.” Confessions of an English Opium-Eater and Other Writings, edited by Grevel Lindop, Oxford, 1985 (1823), pp. 82-85.

Dickens, Charles. Oliver Twist. Penguin English Library, 1970.

Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and The Individual Talent.” Selected Prose, edited by Frank Kermode, John Hayward, Penguin Books, 1953 (1919), pp. 21-30.

Eliot, T. S. “Ulysses, Order and Myth.” Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot, edited by Frank Kermode, Harcourt, 1975 (1923), pp. 175-178.

Eliot, T. S. “The Waste Land.” The Waste Land Authoritative Text, Contexts, Criticism, edited by Michael North, Norton Critical Editions, 2011 (1922), pp. 3-26.

Freud, Sigmund. “On Those Wrecked by Success.” Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works, edited and translated by James Strachey, Hogarth Press, 1952 (1916), pp. 316-331.

Gunn, Daniel P. “Free Indirect Discourse and Narrative Authority in ‘Emma’.” Narrative, vol. 12, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20107329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2003.0023

Harcourt, John B. “I Pray You, Remember the Porter.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 12, 1961, pp. 393-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2867456

Hauck, Christina. “Abortion and the Individual Talent.” ELH, vol. 70, no. 1, 2003, pp. 223–266. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2003.0003

Holbert, Carolyn. “‘Stranded in the Wasteland:’ Literary Allusion in The Sharpest Sight.” Studies in American Indian Literatures, vol. 14, no. 1, 2002, pp. 1-25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20737121.

Humphreys, A. R. “Introduction.” Henry IV Part 1, edited by Richard Proudfoot, The Arden Shakespeare Second Series, 1985, p. xlvi.

Jordan, John. “The Purloined Handkerchief.” Dickens Studies Annual, vol. 18, 1989, pp. 1-17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44371627

Joyce, James. Ulysses. Jeri Johnson, editor. Oxford UP. 1993.

Levitt, Morton P. “A Hero for Our Time: Leopold Bloom and the Myth of Ulysses.” James Joyce Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 1, 1972, pp. 132–146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25487028

Lernout, Geert. “Ulysses in The Little Review.” James Joyce Literary Supplement, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 8–9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26636028

McCombe, John P. “Cleopatra and Her Problems: T. S. Eliot and the Fetishization of Shakespeare’s Queen of the Nile.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 31, no. 2, 2007, pp. 23–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30053266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/JML.2008.31.2.23

Magnusson, A. Lynne. “Interruption in ‘The Tempest’.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 37 no. 1, 1986, pp. 52–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2870191

Nohrnberg, James C. “The Mythical Method in Song and Saga, Prose and Verse: Part One.” Arthuriana, vol. 21, no. 1, 2011, pp. 20–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23238271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/art.2011.0000

Rimo, Patricia A. “‘Proteus’: From Thoughts to Things.” Studies in the Novel, vol. 17, no. 3, 1985, pp. 296–302. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29532351

Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra, edited by John Wilders, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare: Third Series, 1995 (1623). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00148665

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, edited by Kenneth Muir, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare Second Series, 1984 (1623). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00000007

Shakespeare, William. Henry IV 1, edited by A. R. Humphreys, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare Second Series, 1985 (1623).

Shakespeare, William. The Tempest, edited by Frank Kermode, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare Second Series, 1997 (1623). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00005476

Shakespeare, William. Cymbeline, edited by Valerie Wayne, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare Third Series, 2017 (1623). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00005810

Shakespeare, William. King John, edited by E. A. J. Honigmann, Bloomsbury Publishing, The Arden Shakespeare Third Series, 2018 (1623).

Stewart, Alan. “Shakespeare and the Carriers.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 4, 2007, pp. 431–464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4625010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2007.0055

Tromly, Frederic B. “Macbeth and His Porter.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 2, 1975, pp. 151–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2869244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2869244

Wayne, Valerie. “Notes to Cymbeline.” Cymbeline, edited by Wayne, The Arden Shakespeare Third Series, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408160435.00000037

Zemka, Sue. “The Death of Nancy ‘Sikes,’ 1838–1912.” Representations, vol. 110 no. 1, 2010, pp. 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2010.110.1.29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2010.110.1.29