The contribution of cognitive anthropolinguistics to educational linguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.46Resumen
In this paper it is argued that, despite the welcome psycho-social emphasis in educational linguistic theories witnessed in recent decades, and with it, a rapprochement of the social sciences to the psychological sciences, the relationship between these fields has not gone far enough. The actual challenge is a move towards the unification of the social, psychological and language sciences (anthropology and sociology; cognitive science; and linguistics). A step in this interdisciplinary direction is offered by the discipline called 'cognitive anthropolinguistics', and its central concept of 'cultural cognition'. The paper discusses the implication of this concept for the field of educational linguistics, followed by a brief illustration of a cognitive-cultural application of that concept, namely the concept of 'ethnic stereotype', as part of a socio-cultural guide for a cross-cultural pedagogical grammar.Descargas
Citas
Casson, R.W. 1994. “Cognitive anthropology”. Handbook of Psychological Anthropology. Ed. P. K. Boch. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Clément, R. “Social psychology and intergroup communication”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15/3: 222-30.
Clancy, P. 1986. “The acquisition of communicative competence style in Japanese”. Language and Socialization across Cultures. Eds. B. Schieffelin and E. Ochs. London: Longman. 213-251.
Craig, J.A. 1986. Culture Shock. Singapore: Times Book International.
D’Andrade, R. 1989. “Cultural Cognition”. Foundations of Cognitive Science. Ed. M. Posner. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. 795-831.
D’Andrade, R. 1995. Developments in Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
D’Andrade, R. and Strauss, C. 1992. (eds.). Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.
Dennett, D. 1990. Consciousness Explained. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Fiske, S. 1993. “Social cognition and social perception”. Annual Review of Psychology: 155-94.
Garrett, P. et al. 1989. “The contexts of language learning: extending the intergroup model of second language acquisition”. Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions. Eds. S. Ting Toomey and F. Korzenny. London: SAGE. 201- 222.
Grace,W. 1987. The Linguistic Construction of Reality. London: Croom Helm.
Haslett, B. 1989. “Communication and language acquisition within a cultural context”. Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions. Eds. S. Ting Toomey and F. Korzenny. London: SAGE. 19-35.
Hill, J., and Mac Laury, R.E. 1995. “The terror of Moctezuma: Aztec history, vantage theory, and the category of “person”. Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World. Eds. J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury. Berlin: Mouton/De Gruyter. 277- 331.
Hilton, J., and von Hippel, W. 1996. “Stereotypes”. Annual Review of Psychology: 237-71.
Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.). 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hunt, E. and F. Agnoli. 1991. “The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive-psychological perspective”. Psychological Review 98/3: 377-89.
Hymes, F. 1985. “Towards linguistic competence”. AILA Review 2: 9-24.
Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lucy, J.A. 1992. Language Diversity and Thought. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.
Martín Morillas, J.M. 1997. “La categorización estereotípica: un modelo cognitivocultural”. Estudios de Lingüística General (III). Eds. J.A. de Molina Redondo and J. de Dios Luque Durán. Granada: Método Ediciones.
Martín Morillas, J.M. “The concept of ‘self’: its categorization and expression in Spanish”. Language Design (in press).
McCulloch, G. 1995. The Mind and its World. London: Routledge.
Oerter, R. et al. 1996. “The concept of human nature in East Asia: etic and emic characteristics”. Culture and Psychology 2/1: 9-53.
Piedmont, R. and J.H. Chae. 1997. “Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality”. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 29/2: 131-55.
Searle, J. 1995. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Basic Books.
Seelye. N. 1984. Teaching Culture: Strategies for Intercultural Communication.
Lincolnwood, Ill. National Text Co.
Shore, B. 1990. “Twice-born, once-conceived: meaning-construction and cultural cognition”. American Anthropologist 93: 9-27.
Shore, B. 1995. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture and the Problem of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schumann, J. 1993. “Where is cognition?”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 231-242.
Spiro, M. 1984. “Some reflections on cultural determinism and relativism with special reference to emotion and reason”. Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion. Eds. R. Shweder and R.A. LeVine. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press. 323-347.
Shweder, R., and Bourne, E. J. 1984. “Does the concept of person vary crossculturally?”. Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion. Eds. R. Shweder and R.A. LeVine. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press. 200-214.
Stern, H.H. 1983. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, J., and Rosch, E. 1992. The Embodied Mind: Human Cognition and Experience. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Verschueren, J. 1987. Pragmatics as a Theory of Linguistic Adaptation. IPRA Working Document 1.
Wierzbicka, A. 1992. Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture- Specific Configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
El autor o autora conserva todos los derechos sobre su artículo y cede a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, no siendo necesaria la autorización de la revista para su difusión una vez publicado. Una vez publicada la versión del editor el autor está obligado a hacer referencia a ella en las versiones archivadas en los repositorios personales o institucionales.
El artículo se publicará con una licencia Creative Commons de Atribución, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista.
Se recomienda a los autores/as el archivo de la versión de editor en repositorios institucionales.