Semantic structure, realtional networks, and domains of reference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.52Abstract
In this paper we make use of some of the conceptual tools provided by Cognitive Linguistics in order to discuss the issue of knowledge organization. We start off from the account provided by Ruiz de Mendoza (1996), who fleshes out the key ideas of the network organization model postulated by Langacker (1987). In Ruiz de Mendoza's account a semantic characterization consists of what he terms a general definer, which is a kind of semantic invariant, plus a number of prototypical instantiations of the definer. The instantiations are accessed relationally. Our own account tries to improve on Ruiz de Mendoza's initial insights by making his proposal compatible with Langacker's notions of base and profile, and by organizing the resulting description in the form of sets of converging cognitive models, a proposal made by Lakoff (1987) which is fully compatible with the network characterization. To illustrate our view we offer an analysis of the concept of 'mother', which has been variously studied by a number of linguists working within the cognitive paradigm. Our analysis is mainly based on Lakoff's account, but we further structure each converging model in terms of the domains on which it is potentially profiled. This has the advantage of providing a much richer characterization which facilitates the instantiation process.Downloads
References
Coseriu, E. & H. Geckeler. 1981. Trends in Structural Semantics. Tübingen: Narr.
Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fillmore, C. 1975. “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning”. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 123-131.
Fillmore, C. 1982. “Frame semantics”. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Ed. Linguistic Society of Korea. Seoul: Hanshin. 111-138.
Fillmore, C. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6, 2: 222-254.
Fillmore, C. & B. T. S. Atkins. 1992. “Towards a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbours”. Frames, Fields and Contrasts. Eds. A. Lehrer & E. Kittay. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 75-102.
Fillmore, C. & B. T. S. Atkins. 1994. “Starting where dictionaries stop: the challenge of corpus lexicography”. Computational Approaches to the Lexicon. Eds. B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 349-393.
Goddard, C. 1998. Semantic Analysis. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, J. 1980. “Dictionaries and encyclopedias”. Lingua 50: 329-357.
Hilferty, J. 1997. “Mothers, lies, and bachelors: A brief reply to Wierzbicka (1990)”. Word 48, 1: 51-59.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1989. “Some empirical results about the nature of concepts”. Mind & Language 4: 103-129.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, i, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, G. 1981 (1974). Semantics. The Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Minsky, M. 1975. “A framework for representing knowledge”. The Psychology of Computer Vision. Ed. P. H. Winston. New York: McGraw Hill. 211-277.
Quinn, N. 1987. “Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage”. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Eds. D. Holland & N. Quinn.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173-192.
Rosch, E. 1977. “Human categorization”. Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol.1. Ed. N. Warren. New York: Academic Press. 1-49.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 1996. “Semantic networks in conceptual structure”. EPOS 12: 339-356.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 1997. “On ‘relational frames’: the case of ‘risk’ revisited”. Alfinge 9: 397-410.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 1998. “On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 259-274.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & C. Pascual. 1998. “Conceptual schemas as propositional idealized cognitive models: in seach of a unified framework for the analysis of knowledge organization”. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 28-29: 257-270.
Rumelhart, D. E. 1975. “Notes on a schema for stories”. Representation and Understanding. Eds. D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins. New York: Academic Press.211-236.
Santibáñez, F., forthcoming. “Conceptual interaction and Spanish diminutives”. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica.
Schank, R. & R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tannen, D. 1979. “What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations”. New Directions in Discourse Processing. Ed. R. Freedle. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 137-181.
Taylor, J. R. 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon (2nd ed. 1995).
Turner, M. & G. Fauconnier. 1995. “Conceptual integration and formal expression”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 183-204.
van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wierzbicka, A. 1980. Lingua Mentalis. The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.
Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics. Primes and Universals. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
