Errores y retroalimentación correctiva en la producción escrita de estudiantes chinos de inglés como lengua extranjera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.5915Palabras clave:
Inglés como lengua extranjera (ILE), Análisis de errores, Retroalimentación correctiva, China, Habilidades de producción escritaResumen
Los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera (ILE, por sus siglas en inglés) suelen enfrentarse a errores gramaticales al escribir. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los tipos de errores cometidos por estudiantes chinos de ILE en la destreza de producción escrita y explorar las razones detrás de estos errores cometidos, así como la retroalimentación correctiva proporcionada por los docentes de ILE en respuesta a los errores de los estudiantes. Se empleó un diseño de investigación de estudio de caso de métodos mixtos. Se recopilaron datos de las composiciones producidas por 62 estudiantes de tercer año de educación secundaria (2º Bachillerato) en el centro educativo No.1 de Jining en Shandong, China, y de entrevistas semiestructuradas con cinco docentes de ILE de China. Los datos fueron analizados utilizando análisis temático y estadística descriptiva. Este estudio encontró que la omisión fue el error más común cometido por los estudiantes chinos de ILE. Estrategias de aprendizaje inapropiadas, transferencia negativa, excesiva generalización, falta de motivación y actitud positiva fueron las razones de este fenómeno. Se encontró que tanto la retroalimentación correctiva implícita como explícita fueron utilizadas por los instructores de ILE en respuesta a los errores de sus estudiantes. Los resultados proporcionan una evidencia pedagógica útil para los instructores de ILE en su tarea de apoyar las habilidades de producción escrita de los aprendices de ILE.
Descargas
Citas
Banaruee, Hassan, et al. “Recasts vs. Direct Corrective Feedback on Writing Performance of High School EFL Learners.” Cogent Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2018.1455333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455333
Bartram, Mark and Walton, Richard. Correction: Mistake Management - A Positive Approach to Language Mistakes. Language Teaching Publications, 1991.
Bitchener, John and Knoch, Ute. “The Value of Written Corrective Feedback for Migrant and International Students.” Language Teaching Research, vol. 12, no. 3, 2008, pp. 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924
Bitchener, John and Knoch, Ute. “The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten-month Investigation.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 31, no. 2, 2010, pp. 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Carroll, Susanne and Swain, Merrill. “Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 15, no. 3, 1993, pp. 357-386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100012158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012158
Chandler, Jean. “The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2003, pp. 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Corder, Stephen Pit. “The Significance of Learner’s Errors.” IRAL, vol. 5, no. 1-4, 1967, pp.161-170. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED019903.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
Dulay, Heidi, et al. Language Two. Oxford University Press, 1982
Ellis, Rod. “Modelling Learning Difficulty and Second Language Proficiency: The Differential Contributions of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 3, 2006, pp. 431-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml022
Ellis, Rod. “Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development.” L2 Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 3-18. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2504d6w3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
Erlam, Rosemary, Ellis, Rod and Batstone, Rob. “Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing: Two Approaches Compared.” System, vol. 41, no. 2, 2013, pp. 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004
Ferris, Dana R. “Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple-draft Composition Classrooms.” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, 1995, pp. 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804
Ferris, Dana R. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607201
Ferris, Dana R. “Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students.” Assessing Writing, vol. 19, 2014, pp. 6-23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004
Ferris, Dana R. “Does Error Feedback Help Student Writers? New Evidence on the Short-and Long-term Effects of Written Error Correction.” Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by Ken Hyland and Fiona Hyland, Cambridge University Press 2006, pp. 81-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
Ferris, Dana R and Roberts, Barrie. “Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How Explicit Does It Need to Be?” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 10, no. 3, 2001, pp. 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Gardner, Robert C. “Motivation and Second Language Acquisition.” Porta Linguarum, vol. 8, 2007, pp. 9-20. https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/31616/ Gardner.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31616
Khaki, Mojgan and Tabrizi, Hossein Heidari. “Assessing the Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Process-Based vs Product-Based Instruction on Learners' Writing.” Language Teaching Research Quarterly, vol. 21, 2021, pp. 35-53. https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/275/ltrq.2021.21.03.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.21.03
Krashen, Stephen D. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Prentice Hall, 1988.
Kroll, Barbara. “Assessing Writing Abilities.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 18, 1998, pp. 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003561
Lee, Icy. “How do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing?” Education Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, 2003, pp. 153-169.
Long, Michael H. “The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition.” Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia, Academic Press, 1996, pp. 413–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Lyster, Roy. “Differential Effects of Prompts and Recasts in Form-focused Instruction.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 26, no. 3, 2004, pp. 399-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263104263021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
Maniam, Mahendran and Rajagopal, Punethawathi. “Simple Past Tense Errors Based on Surface Structure Taxonomy in ESL Malaysian Undergraduates Writing.” Global Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 3, no. 6, 2016, pp 547-553. http://www.gjar.org/publishpaper/vol3issue2/ed515r43.pdf
Maolida, Elis Homsini and Hidayat, Milma Vinca Cantikka. “Writing Errors Based on Surface Structure Taxonomy: A Case of Indonesian EFL Students’ Personal Letters.” Proceedings International Conference on Education of Suryakancana, Indonesia 9th January 2021, edited by Jauhar Helmie, 2021, pp. 336-344.
Ministry of Education. English Curriculum Standards for Senior High Schools. People's Education Press Beijing, 2018.
Mohamed Mubarak. Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Study of Practices and Effectiveness in the Bahrain Context. 2013. University of Sheffield, PhD thesis. https://core.ac.uk/reader/14343690
Nazari, Nastaran. “The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Grammar Instruction on Learners’ Achievements in Receptive and Productive Modes.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 70, no. 1, 2013, pp. 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.051
Nunan, David. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. Prentice Hall, 1991.
Robb, Thomas, Ross, Steven and Shortreed, Ian. “Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality.” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 1, 1986, pp. 83-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390
Sang, Yuan. “Investigate the ‘Issues’ in Chinese Students’ English Writing and Their ‘Reasons’: Revisiting the Recent Evidence in Chinese Academia.” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 6, no. 3, 2017, pp 1-11. https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/11288/7075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p1
Saputra, Heru. “Surface Strategy Taxonomy: Error Analysis in Academic Writing.” ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), vol. 13, no. 2, 2022, pp. 226-235. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v13i2.12462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v13i2.12462
Semke, Harriet D. “Effects of the Red Pen.” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 17, 1984, pp. 195-202. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x
Sermsook, Kanyakorn, et al. “The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers’ Grammatical Improvement.” English Language Teaching, vol. 10, no. 10, 2017, pp. 43-49. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p43
Truscott, John. “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.” Language Learning, vol. 46, no. 2, 1996, pp. 327-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Van Beuningen, Catherine et al. “Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing.” Language Learning, vol. 62, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Vyatkina, Nina. “The Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback in Teaching Beginning German.” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 43, no. 4, 2010, pp. 671-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01108.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01108.x
Yang, Junmin. “On Western and Chinese Modes of Thinking and Features of Chinese and English Languages.” Journal of Central South University (Social Science), vol. 7, no. 4, 2001, pp. 378-380. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3104.2001.04.023
Zafar, Ameena. “Error Analysis: A Tool to Improve English Skills of Undergraduate Students.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 217, 2016, pp. 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.122
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Zhuoqun Bi, Su Kia lau, Leng Lee Yap
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El autor o autora conserva todos los derechos sobre su artículo y cede a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, no siendo necesaria la autorización de la revista para su difusión una vez publicado. Una vez publicada la versión del editor el autor está obligado a hacer referencia a ella en las versiones archivadas en los repositorios personales o institucionales.
El artículo se publicará con una licencia Creative Commons de Atribución, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista.
Se recomienda a los autores/as el archivo de la versión de editor en repositorios institucionales.