Seres hastiados y distancia corporal: un estudio de caso del Síndrome de Cotard en “Infinite Jest”

Autores/as

  • Ana Chapman University of Málaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3953

Palabras clave:

Agencia, experiencia corpórea, David Foster Wallace, conciencia de sí mismo, adicción, literatura cognitiva

Resumen

Este artículo pretende mostrar la importancia de las emociones y las sensaciones que emergen en la representación del cuerpo y en el (r)establecimiento de la identidad en la novela Infinite Jest, de David Foster Wallace. En ella se percibe un mundo donde la sobresaturación de elecciones de entretenimiento ha creado una tradición de hastío y adicción como parte de la búsqueda hedonística del placer. Esto es relevante para comprender los efectos sobre el “yo” y la agencia y que, consecuentemente, se pueden enmarcar en desórdenes mentales. Desde un enfoque neurocientífico, la descripción de los personajes que narra Wallace es analizado en su posible conexión con el síndrome de Cotard. Este delirio ayuda a mostrar cómo la falta de emociones invalida una representación correcta del cuerpo, dando así lugar a la creencia de uno mismo de estar muerto o ser inexistente en la novela.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Ana Chapman, University of Málaga

Ana Chapman, PhD, is a lecturer at the University of Málaga. She holds an MA in American Literature from the University of Sheffield and then completed her PhD on David Foster Wallace’s novel Infinite Jest at the University of Seville. She is a member of the research group “Discursos de la Postmodernidad” (HUM 399). Her main research interests are the representation of body and mind in contemporary English literature, neuroscience in literature, and the effects of the media and technology on society.

 

Ana Chapman. Departamento de Filología Inglesa, Francesa y Alemana. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Teatinos. 29071, Málaga, Spain. Tel.: +34 952131782

Citas

Berrios, G. E. and R. Luque. 1995. “Cotard's Delusion or Syndrome? A Conceptual History”. Comprehensive Psychiatry 36: 218-23.

Burn, S. 2003. David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest: A Reader's Guide. New York: Continuum Contemporaries.

Burn, S. 2013. “Webs of Nerves Pulsing and Firing”. A Companion to David Foster Wallace Studies. Eds. M. Boswell, and S. J. Burn. New York: Macmillan. 59-85.

Carruthers, G. 2008. “Types of Body Representation and Sense of Embodiment”. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 1302-1316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001.

Chapman, A. 2019. “Piecing Together: Body Control, Mutability and Entertainment Technology in Infinite Jest”. Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos 23: 95-116. http://doi.org/10.12795/REN.2019.i23.05.

Cioffi, F. L. 2000. “An Anguish Become Thing: Narrative as Performance in David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest”. Narrative 8 (2): 161-181.

Craig, A. D. 2002. “How do you feel? Interoception: The Sense of the Physiological Condition of Body”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (8): 655-666. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894.

Craig, A. D. 2003. “Interoception: The Sense of the Physiological Condition of the Body”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13 (4): 500-05. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00090-4.

Damasio, A. 1995. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: G.P. Putman’s sons.

Damasio, A. 2010. Self Comes to Mind. Constructing the Conscious Brain, London: Heineman.

Debruyne, H., Portzky, M., Peremans, K. and K. Audenaert. 2011. “Cotard's Syndrome”. Mind and Brain, the Journal of Psychiatry: 67-72. http://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.145206.

Fotopoulou, A., Jenkinson P. M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Rudd A. and M. D. Kopelman 2011. “Mirror-view Reverses Somatoparaphrenia: Dissociation between First- and Third-person Perspectives on Body Ownership”. Neuropsychologia 49: 3946-3955. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.011.

Farrer, C. and C. D. Frith. 2002. “Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency”. Neuroimage 15 (3): 596-603. http://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1009.

Frith, C. 2006. “The Neural Basis of Hallucinations and Delusions”. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328: 169-175. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.10.012.

Fogel, A. 2009. The Psychophysiology of Self-awareness: Rediscovering the Lost Art of body Sense. New York: W. W. Norton.

Fromm, E. 1985. To Have or to Be. London: Abacus.

Freudenthal, E. 2010. “Anti-interiority: Compulsiveness, Objectification, and Identity in Infinite Jest”. New Literary History. 41 (1): 191-211. http://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0145.

Gallagher, S. 2000. “Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implications for Cognitive Science”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):14-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5.

Grover, S., Aneja J., Mahajan S. and S. Varma. 2014. “Cotard's Syndrome: Two Case and a Brief Review of Literature.” Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice 4 (Suppl. 1): S59-62. http://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.145206.

Haggard, P. and B. Eitam eds. 2015. The Sense of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lipsky, D. 2010. Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace. New York: Broadway.

Martin, M. 1995. “Bodily Awareness: A Sense of Ownership”. The Body and the Self. Eds. J. L. Bermudez, A. J. Marcel and N. M. Eilan. Cambridge: MIT Press: 267-289.

Miller, L. 2012. “The Salon Interview: David Foster Wallace”. Conversations with David Foster Wallace. Ed. S. J. Burn. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi: 58-65.

Moschopoulos, N. P., Kaprinis, S. and J. Nimatoudis. 2016. “Cotard’s Syndrome: Case Report and a Brief Review of Literature”. Psychiatriki 27 (4): 296-302. http://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2016.274.296.

Ramachandran, V. S. 2011. The Tell-tale Brain: Unlocking the Mystery of Human Nature. London: William Heinemann.

Russell, E. 2010. “Some Assembly Required: The Embodied Politics of Infinite Jest”. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory 66 (3): 147-169. http://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2010.0001

Sahoo, A. and K. A. Josephs. 2018. “A Neuropsychiatric Analysis of the Cotard Delusion”. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 30 (1): 48-65. http://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17010018.

Swets, M., Dekker, J., van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen, K., Smid, G. E., Smit, F., de Hann, L. and R. A. Schoevers. 2014. “The Obsessive Compulsive Spectrum in Schizophrenia, a Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Exploring Prevalence Rates.” Schizophrenia Research 152 (2-3): 458-68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.10.033.

Tomasetti, C., Valchera, A.,Fornaro, M., Vellante, F., Orsolini, L., Carano, A., Ventriglio, A., Di Giannantonio, M. and D. De Berardis. 2020. “The ‘Dead Man Walking’ Disorder: An Update on Cotard’s Syndrome”. International Review of Psychiatry 32 (5-6): 500-509. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1769881.

Tsakiris, M. 2010. “My Body in the Brain: A Neurocognitive Model of Body-Ownership”. Neuropsychologia, 48 (3): 703-712. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034.

Tsakiris, M. and A. Fotopoulou. 2013. “From the Fact to the Sense of Agency”. Decomposing the Will. Eds. A. Clark, J Kiverstein and T. Vierkant. New York: Oxford University Press. 103-117.

Upthegrove, R., Marwaha, S. and M. Birchwood. 2017. “Depression and Schizophrenia: Cause, Consequence, or Trans-diagnostic Issue?". Schizophrenia Bulletin 43 (2): 240-244. http://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw097.

Wallace, D. F. 2006. Infinite Jest. New York: Back Bay Books.

Žižek, S. 2008. In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.

Descargas

Publicado

23-12-2020

Cómo citar

Chapman, A. (2020). Seres hastiados y distancia corporal: un estudio de caso del Síndrome de Cotard en “Infinite Jest”. Journal of English Studies, 18, 37–58. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3953

Número

Sección

Artículos