Aristotle's theory of distributive justice in the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/redur.5066Keywords:
Traditional informal justice systems, Aristotelian distributive justice, Rule of Law, Human RightsAbstract
This paper presents the traditional informal justice systems as an example where it can be seen how the Aristotelian doctrine on distributive justice allows to teleologically justify the existence of different judicial models to the liberal State procedural systems which in the 21st Century ordinarily apply the essential principles of natural Law.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES, Ética a Nicómaco (trad. de Calvo Martínez, J. L.), (Alianza, Madrid 2001)
BARONA VILAR, S., Mediación Penal. Fundamento, fines y régimen jurídico, (Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia 2011).
CHIRAYATH, L., SAGE, C. y WOOLCOCK, M, Customary Law and Policy Reform: Engaging with the Plurality of Justice Systems, (World Bank, Washington 2005)
Danish Institute for Human Rights, Informal Justice Systems: Charting a Course for Human Rights Based Engagement, (United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, New York 2013).
GARCÍA SOTO, L., Teoría de la justicia e idea del Derecho en Aristóteles, (Marcial Pons, Madrid 2011).
HIERRO SÁNCHEZ-PESCADOR, L. L., “El concepto de justicia y la teoría de los derechos”, en DÍAZ GARCÍA, E. y COLOMER, J. L. (eds.), Estado, justicia, derechos, (Alianza, Madrid, 2002), pp. 11-74.
JONES, C., “Maori and State visions of Law and peace”, en HICKFORD, M. y JONES, C. (eds.), Indigenous Peoples and the Law. International perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi, (Routledge, Oxford 2018) pp. 18-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351240376-2
KANT, I., Principios metafísicos del Derecho (trad. de Lizarraga, G.), (Victoriano Suárez, Madrid 1873)
LIÉBANA ORTIZ, J. R., Los sistemas tradicionales de justicia informal en el siglo XXI, (Thomson Reuter Civitas, Cizur Menor 2018)
MACINTYRE, A., Tras la virtud (trad. de Valcárcel, A.), (Crítica, Barcelona 2004).
MCELREA, F., “Justice in the Community: The New Zealand Experience”, en BURNSIDE, J. y BAKER, N. (eds.), Relational Justice: Repairing the Breach, (Waterside Press, Winchester 1994).
RAWLS, J., A Theory of Justice, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1971). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
SANDEL, M., Justicia ¿Hacemos lo que debemos? (trad. Campos Gómez, J. P.), 4.ª ed., (Debate, Barcelona 2017).
SHERMAN, L. W. y STRANG, H., Restorative justice: the evidence, (The Smith Institute, London 2007).
ROUSSEAU, J. J., Discurso sobre la economía política (trad. y ed. Vélez, F.), (Maia, Madrid 2011).
WALZER, M., Spheres of Justice, (Basic Books, New York 1983).
WATSON, D., BOUCHERAT, J., y DAVIS, G., “Reparation for retributivists”, en WRIGHT, M. y GALAWAY, B. (ed.), Mediation and Criminal Justice: victims, offenders and community, (Sage, London 1999), pp. 212-228.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The works published in REDUR are submitted to the following terms:
- The journal maintains the works published copyright, favours and allows the works reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NonDerivs 3.0 Unported license (legal text).
- Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be requested to Copyright Owners.
- Authors accept: the journal’s license of use; copyright policies and self- archiving; open access policy.
- In case of reuse published source must be acknowledged:
- Must include set publisher statement:
First published in Revista del Departamento de Dercho de la Universidad de La Rioja (REDUR) in [volume and number, or year], published by Universidad de La Rioja (Spain). - Set phrase to accompany link to published version:
The original publication is available at: www.unirioja.es/redur
