Quentin Skinner y la Historia en las Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/redur.6449Palabras clave:
Historia Intelectual, Humanidades, Filosofía PolíticaResumen
En la década de 1960 irrumpió con fuerza en el panorama académico, un grupo de investigadores caracterizado por utilizar un nuevo enfoque centrado en el análisis de las acciones ilocucionarias del lenguaje enfatizando en la importancia del contexto histórico para comprender las ideas que generan entre otros, los discursos políticos. Este giro contextual logró consolidarse como un epicentro de innovación metodológica en el estudio del pensamiento político y el abordaje de la historia intelectual. En el núcleo de esta tradición se encuentra Quentin Skinner, cuya obra ha establecido un estándar de excelencia en la interpretación histórica del pensamiento político desde el abordaje de la historia intelectual. Su contribución en el capítulo octavo de la obra, History in the Humanities and Social Sciences, editada junto a Richard Bourke en 2002 a través de Cambridge University Press, denominado, Political Philosophy and the Uses of History, reafirma la historia como una herramienta crítica esencial para enfrentar los desafíos del siglo XXI y defiende el historicismo en filosofía política, destacando su capacidad para comprender los conceptos políticos en su contexto histórico y las intenciones de sus autores. Además, muestra que la historia no es solo un relato del pasado, sino un instrumento vivo para interpretar y moldear el presente, consolidando el legado de Skinner y su escuela como referentes de rigor intelectual y relevancia global.
Descargas
Citas
Ackerly, Brooke y Bajpai, Rochana (2017). ‘Comparative Political Thought’ in Methods in Analytical Political Theory, ed. Adrian Blau, Cambridge, pp. 270-296.
Armitage, David (2014). ‘The International Turn in Intellectual History’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 232-252.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with Words, Oxford.
Ball, Terence (2011). ‘The value of the history of political philosophy’ in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, ed. George Klosko, Oxford, pp. 47-59.
Berlin, Isaiah (1962). ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist?’ in Philosophy, Politics and Society, Second Series, ed. Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman, Oxford, pp. 1-33.
Bird, Gemma (2018). ‘I’ll pass on Plato’, Times Higher Education, 1 November, p. 31.
Blau, Adrian (2017). ‘Interpreting Texts’ in Methods in Analytical Political Theory, ed. Adrian Blau, Cambridge, pp. 243-269.
Blau, Adrian (2020). ‘Meanings and Understandings in the History of Ideas’, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14, pp. 232-256.
Boucher, David (1985). Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas, Dordrecht.
Broad, Jacqueline y Detlefsen, Karen, eds. (2017). Women and Liberty 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays, Oxford.
Carter, Ian (1999). A Measure of Freedom, Oxford.
Carter, Ian (2008). ‘How are Power and Unfreedom Related?’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, Oxford, pp. 58-82.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton.
Cooper, Frederick (2001). ‘What Is the Concept of Globalisation Good for? An African Historian’s Perspective’, African Affairs 100, pp. 189-213.
Dallmayr, Fred (2010). Comparative political theory: an Introduction, New York.
Dryzek, John, Honig, Bonnie y Phillips, Anne, eds. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford.
Dunn, John (1968). ‘The Identity of the History of Ideas’, Philosophy, 43, pp. 85-104.
Dunn, John (2018). ‘Why We Need a Global History of Political Thought’ in Markets, Morals, Politics: Jealousy of Trade and the History of Political Thought, ed. Béla Kapossy, Isaac Nakhimovsky, Sophus Reinert and Richard Whatmore, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 285-309.
Fleischer, Cornell, Kafadar, Cemal y Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (2020). ‘How to Write Fake Global History’, Cromohs, 10 September. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php.cromohs/debate
Floyd, Jonathan (2011). ‘From historical contextualism, to mentalism, to behaviourism’ in Political Philosophy versus History?, ed. Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Oxford, 2011, pp. 38-64.
Freeden, Michael y Vincent, Andrew, eds. (2013). Comparative Political Thought: Theorising practices, London.
Gauthier, David P. (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.
Goldsmith, M. M. (1966). Hobbes’s Science of Politics, New York.
Goodin, Robert E. (2003). ‘Folie Républicaine’, Annual Review of Political Science 6, pp. 55-76.
Gordon, Peter (2014). ‘Contextualism and Criticism in the History of Ideas’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 32-55.
Graham, Gordon (2011). ‘Political philosophy and the dead hand of its history’ in Political Philosophy versus History?, ed. Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Oxford, 2011, pp. 84-102.
Harlan, David (1989). ‘Intellectual History and the Return of Literature’, American Historical Review 94, pp. 581-609.
Hobbes, Thomas (2010). Behemoth or the Long Parliament, ed. Paul Seaward, Oxford.
Hobbes, Thomas (2012). Leviathan, ed. Noel Malcolm, 3 vols, Oxford.
Hood, F. C. (1964). The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes: An Interpretation of Leviathan, Oxford.
Kapila, Shruti (2014). ‘Global Intellectual History and the Indian Political’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 253-274.
Kapust, Daniel y Kinsella, Helen, eds. (2017). Comparative political theory in time and place, New York.
Kelly, Paul (2011). ‘Rescuing political theory from the tyranny of history’ in Political Philosophy versus History?, ed. Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Oxford, 2011, pp. 13-37.
Klosko, George, ed. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, Oxford.
Koskenniemi, Martti (2014). ‘Vitoria and us: Thoughts on Critical Histories of International Law’, Rechsgeschichte 22, pp. 119-138.
Kramer, Matthew (2003). The Quality of Freedom, Oxford.
Kramer, Matthew (2008). ‘Liberty and Domination’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, Oxford, pp. 31-57.
LaCapra, Dominick (1980). ‘Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts’, History and Theory 19, pp. 245-276.
Laursen, John (2013). ‘Five Questions’ in Intellectual history: five questions, ed. Morten Jeppesen, Frederik Stjernfelt and Mikkel Thorup, London, pp. 83-91.
Leader Maynard, Jonathan (2017). ‘Ideological Analysis’ in Methods in Analytical Political Theory, ed. Adrian Blau, Cambridge, pp. 297-324.
Lloyd, Genevieve, ed. (2002). Feminism and the History of Philosophy, Oxford.
McMahon, Darrin (2014). ‘The Return of the History of Ideas?’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 13-31.
McNeilly, F. S. (1968). The Anatomy of Leviathan, London.
Mills, Charles (2015). ‘Decolonizing Western political philosophy’, New Political Science 37, pp. 1-24.
Moyn, Samuel (2014). ‘Imaginary intellectual history’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 112-130.
Moyn, Samuel y Sartori, Andrew, eds. (2013). Global intellectual history, New York.
Müller, Jan-Werner (2014). ‘On Conceptual History’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin McMahon and Samuel Moyn, Oxford, pp. 74-93.
Obregón, Liliana (2017). ‘Martti Koskenniemi’s critique of Eurocentrism in International Law’ in The Law of International Lawyers, ed. Wouter Werner, Marieke de Hoon and Alexis Galan, Cambridge, pp. 360-392.
Orford, Anne (2017). ‘International Law and the limits of history’ in The Law of International Lawyers, ed. Wouter Werner, Marieke de Hoon and Alexis Galan, Cambridge, pp. 297-320.
[Parker, Henry] (1640). The Case of Shipmony briefly discoursed, London.
Patten, Alan (1996). ‘The Republican Critique of Liberalism’, British Journal of Political Science 26, pp. 25-44.
Pettit, Philip (1997). Republicanism: a Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford.
Pocock, J. G. A. (1962). ‘The history of political thought: a methodological enquiry’ in Philosophy, Politics and Society, ed. Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman, Oxford, pp. 183-202.
Pocock, J. G. A. (2019). ‘On the unglobality of contexts: Cambridge methods and the history of political thought’ Global Intellectual History 4, pp. 1-14.
Podoksik, Efraim, (2010). ‘One Concept of Liberty: Towards Writing the History of a Political Concept’, Journal of the History of Ideas 71, pp. 219-240.
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice, Oxford.
Richter, Melvin (2001). ‘A German version of the ‘linguistic turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the history of political and social concepts’ in The History of Political Thought in National Context, ed. Dario Castiglione and Iain Hampsher-Monk, Cambridge, pp. 58-79.
Searle, John (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin (1969). ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory 8, pp. 3-53.
Skinner, Quentin (1998). Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin (2002a). Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method, Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin (2002b). Visions of Politics, Volume III: Hobbes and Civil Science, Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin (2022). ‘On Neo-Roman Liberty: A Response and Reassessment’ in Rethinking Liberty Before Liberalism, ed. Hannah Dawson and Annelien de Dijn, Cambridge, pp. 233-266.
Tarlton, Charles (1973). ‘Historicity, Meaning and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought’, History and Theory 12, pp. 307-328.
Tully, James (2014). On Global citizenship: James Tully in dialogue, London.
Tully, James (2018). ‘Reconciliation Here on Earth’ in Resurgence and Reconciliation: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings, ed. Michael Asch, John Borrows and James Tully, Toronto, pp. 83-132.
Tully, James (2020). ‘Deparochializing Political Theory and Beyond: A dialogue approach to comparative political thought’ in Deparochializing Political Theory, ed. Melissa S. Williams, Cambridge, pp. 1-24.
Warrender, Howard (1957). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: his Theory of Obligation, Oxford.
Whatmore, Richard (2016). ‘Quentin Skinner and the Relevance of Intellectual History’ in A Companion to Intellectual History, ed. Richard Whatmore and Brian Young, Oxford, pp. pp. 97-112.
Williams, Melissa S. Y Mark E. Warren (2014). ‘A democratic case for comparative political theory’, Political Theory 42, pp. 26-57.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Carlos Martínez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
The works published in REDUR are submitted to the following terms:
- The journal maintains the works published copyright, favours and allows the works reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NonDerivs 3.0 Unported license (legal text).
- Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be requested to Copyright Owners.
- Authors accept: the journal’s license of use; copyright policies and self- archiving; open access policy.
- In case of reuse published source must be acknowledged:
- Must include set publisher statement:
First published in Revista del Departamento de Dercho de la Universidad de La Rioja (REDUR) in [volume and number, or year], published by Universidad de La Rioja (Spain). - Set phrase to accompany link to published version:
The original publication is available at: www.unirioja.es/redur
