Diel patterns of suspended sediment flux and the zoogeomorphic agency of invasive crayfish


  • S.P. Rice Loughborough University
  • M.F. Johnson Loughborough University
  • C. Extence Environment Agency
  • J. Reeds Environment Agency
  • H. Longstaff




crayfish, ecosystem engineering, diurnal variability, fines, suspended sediment transport, turbidity, biogeomormorphology


The role of biotic forcing in fluvial geomorphology is understudied.
This paper investigates the suggestion that the activities of signal crayfish
(Pacifastacus leniusculus) can increase suspended sediment fluxes in rivers.
Previous field work, supported by mesocosm experiments, suggests that crayfish nocturnalism can cause night time increases in turbidity, but field data are limited to a 16-hour period from a single site where suspended sediment time-series are not available. Here, field data collected over a 28-day period on the Brampton Branch of the River Nene, UK, are used to quantify the impact of diel fluctuations in suspended sediment concentration on sediment fluxes. Field observations and laboratory experiments are used to evaluate the likelihood that crayfish, which
are abundant in this river, are responsible for the diel patterns. Turbidity and water stage were measured at 2-minute intervals at a single site. Water was sampled for suspended sediment concentration on a diel cycle and during storm events. A relation between suspended sediment concentration and turbidity, along with a local discharge time-series, permitted calculation of sediment flux and sediment loads. Aquarium experiments with one or two crayfish were used to directly observe the relative impacts of crayfish activity and conspecific interactions on sediment suspension. Over the 28-day period, turbidity and suspended sediment exhibited a strong diel pattern, characterised by night-time increases in the frequency and magnitude of spikes in the turbidity data and by increases in ambient suspended sediment concentrations. Small diel fluctuations in stage were also measured, but the rises in stage were out of phase with turbidity and there was no correlation between stage and turbidity at any frequency. In the absence of a credible hydraulic explanation for the increases in night-time suspended sediment concentration, several lines of evidence, including results from the aquarium experiments, strongly suggest that crayfish are the most
likely cause. We estimate that crayfish activity contributed at least 20% of the suspended sediment load over the 28-day period (which included two moderate floods) and this proportion was 47% during the days when baseflow conditions prevailed. This work extends and strengthens the argument that crayfish are important zoogeomorphic agents with potential implications for managing fine sediment pressures. It also highlights the need to better understand the link between crayfish activity, sediment suspension and downstream dispersal, particularly the catchment-scale distribution and seasonality of such impacts.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

S.P. Rice, Loughborough University

Department of Geography

Loughborough University

United Kingdom


Angeler, D.G., Sánchez-Carrillo, S., García, G., Álvarez-Cobelas, M. 2001. The influence of Procambarus clarkia (Cambaridae, Decapoda) on water quality and sediment characteristics in a Spanish floodplain wetland. Hydrobiologia 464, 89-98.

Batalla, R.J. 2003. Sediment deficit in rivers caused by dams and instream gravel mining. A review with examples from NE Spain. Cuaternario y Geomorfología 17, 79-91.

Bond, B.J., Jones, J.A., Moore, G., Phillips, N., Post, D., McDonell, J.J. 2002. The zone of vegetation influence on baseflow revealed by diel patterns of streamflow and vegetation water use in a headwater basin. Hydrological Processes 16, 1671-1677.

Bubb, D.H., Lucas, M.C., Thom, T.J. 2002. Winter movements and activity of signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in an upland river, determined by radio telemetry. Hydrobiologia 483, 111-119.

Burt, T.P. 1979. Diurnal variations in stream discharge and throughflow during a period of low flow. Journal of Hydrology 41, 291-301.

Butler, D.R., Malanson, G.P. 2005. The geomorphic influences of beaver dams and failures of beaver dams. Geomorphology 71, 48-60.

Creed, R.P., Reed, J.M. 2004. Ecosystem engineering by crayfish in a headwater stream community. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23, 224-236.

Crawford, L., Yeomans, W.E., Adams, C.E. 2006. The impact of introduced signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus on stream invertebrate communities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16, 611-621.

Foster, I.D.L., Lees, J.A. 1999. Changing headwater suspended sediment yields in the LOIS catchments over the last century: a paleolimnological, approach. Hydrological Processes 13, 1137-1153.

Gillain, S. 2005. Diel turbidity fluctuations in streams in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference, K.J. Hatcher (ed.), April 25-27, 2005, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Gribovski, Z., Zsilágyi, J., Kalicz, P. 2010. Diurnal fluctuations in shallow groundwater levels and streamflow rates and their interpretation –Areview. Journal of Hydrology 385, 371-383.

Guan, R-Z. 1994. Burrowing behaviour of signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), in the River Great Ouse, England. Freshwater Forum 4, 155-168.

Gurnell, A.M. 1998. The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam-building activity. Progress in Physical Geography 22, 167-189.

Harvey, G., Moorhouse, T.P., Clifford, N.J., Henshaw, A., Johnson, M.F., MacDonald, D.W., Reid, I., Rice, S.P. 2011. Evaluating the role of invasive aquatic species as drivers of fine sedimentrelated river management problems: the case of the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Progress in Physical Geography 35, 517-533.

Harvey, G., Henshaw, A., Moorhouse, T., Clifford, N., Holah, H., Grey, J., Macdonald, D. 2014. Invasive crayfish as drivers of fine sediment dynamics in rivers: field and laboratory evidence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39, 259-271.

Hassan, M.A., Gottesfeld, A.S., Montgomery, D.R., Tunnicliffe, J.F., Clarke, G.K.C., Wynn, G., Jones-Cox, H., Poirier, R., MacIsaac, E., Herunter, H., Macdonald, S.J. 2008. Salmondriven bedload transport and bed morphology in mountain streams. Geophysical Research Letters 35, L0440, doi, 10.1029/2007GL032997.

Johnson, M.F., Rice, S.P., Reid, I. 2010. Topographic disturbance of subaqueous gravel substrates by signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Geomorphology 123, 269-278.

Johnson, M.F., Rice, S.P., Reid, I. 2011. Increase in coarse sediment transport associated with disturbance of gravel river beds by signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36, 1680-1692.

Johnson, M.F., Rice, S.P., Reid, I. 2014. The activity of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in relation to thermal and hydraulic dynamics of an alluvial stream. Hydrobiologia 724, 41-54.

Kemp, P., Sear, D., Collins, A., Naden, P., Jones, I. 2011. The impacts of fine sediment on riverine fish. Hydrological Processes 25, 1800-1821.

Loperfido, J.V., Just, C.L., Papanicolaou, A.N., Schnoor, J.L. 2010. In situ sensing to understand diel turbidity cycles, suspended solids, and nutrient transport in Clear Creek, Iowa. Water Resources Research 46,W06525, doi:10.1029/2009WR008293.

Moorhouse, T.P., Macdonald, D.W. 2011. The effect of manual removal on movement distances in populations of signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Freshwater Biology 56, 2370-2377.

Owens, P.N., Batalla, R., Collins, A.J., Gomez, B., Hicks, D.M., Horowitz, A.J., Kondolf, G.M., Marden, M., Page, M.J., Peacock, D.H., Petticrew, E.L., Salomons, W., Trustrum, N.A. 2005. Fine-grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Research and Applications 21, 693-717.

Peay, S. 2001. Eradication of Alien Crayfish Populations. Technical R&D Report W1-037/TR. Environment Agency, Bristol, 116 pp.

Rice, S.P., Johnson, M.F., Reid, I. 2012 Animals and the Geomorphology of Gravel-bed Rivers. In Gravel-bed rivers: processes, tools, environments, M. Church, P. Biron, A.G. Roy (eds). JohnWiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 225-241.

Sidorchuk, A.Y., Golosov, V.N. 2003. Erosion and sedimentation on the Russian Plain, II: the history of erosion and sedimentation during the period of intensive agriculture. Hydrological Processes 17, 3347-3358.

Statzner, B., Fievet, E., Champagne, J-Y., Morel, R., Herouin, E. 2000. Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: biological behaviour affects sand and gravel erosion in experimental streams. Limnology and Oceanography 45, 1030-1040.

Statzner, B., Peltret, O., Tomanova, S. 2003. Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: effect of a biomass gradient on baseflow and flood-induced transport of gravel and sand in experimental streams. Freshwater Biology 48, 147-163.

Statzner, B. 2012. Geomorphological implications of engineering bed sediments by lotic animals. Geomorphology 157-158, 49-65.

Wang, G.Q., Wu, B. S., Wang, Z-Y. 2005. Sedimentation problems and management strategies of Sanmenxia Reservoir, Yellow River, China. Water Resources Research 41, W09417, 17.10.1029/2004WR003919.

Wharton, G., Cotton, J.A., Wotton, R.S., Bass, J. A. B., Heppell, C. M., Trimmer, M., Sanders, I. A., Warren, L.L. 2006. Macrophytes and suspension-feeding invertebrates modify flows and fine sediments in the Frome and Piddle catchments, Dorset (UK). Journal of Hydrology 330, 171-184.

Wood, P.J., Armitage, P.D. 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21, 203-217.




How to Cite

Rice S, Johnson M, Extence C, Reeds J, Longstaff H. Diel patterns of suspended sediment flux and the zoogeomorphic agency of invasive crayfish. CIG [Internet]. 2014 Mar. 6 [cited 2024 May 25];40(1):7-28. Available from: https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/cig/article/view/2508