Social network analysis in Geosciences: scientific collaboration between periglacial scholars in the Iberian Peninsula

C. García-Hernández; J. Ruiz-Fernández; E. Serrano-Cañadas

doi:10.18172/cig.3939

Authors

C. García-Hernández University of Oviedo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-9128
J. Ruiz-Fernández University of Oviedo
E. Serrano-Cañadas University of Valladolid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.3939

Keywords:

Social Network Analysis, scientific collaboration, coauthorship network, periglacial studies, permafrost, Iberian Peninsula

Abstract

This research examines the collaboration relationships between those authors affiliated to Iberian institutions and involved in periglacial studies between 2000 and 2017. The data has been extracted from the Google Scholar database and processed using Social Network Analysis (SNA) techniques. A total of 230 scientific publications have been selected, involving 198 researchers of which 113 belong to Spanish institutions, 38 to Portuguese institutions and 47 to foreign institutions. The work carried out by the Iberian community (assembled through national groups linked to the International Permafrost Association) has considerably improved its possibilities of dissemination and citation in this period: There has been an increase in the number of publications per year, in the number of authors per publication, and in the number of publications with international collaboration. Nowadays there is a group of very productive and well-connected authors, who play an important role as intermediaries, and future prospects are good. However, 50% of the authors have a low capacity for interaction, and there is a low presence of women in the network: These imbalances should constitute the main challenges to be faced by the Iberian community in the next decade. Beyond the Iberian community of periglacial scholars, this study provides an example of methodology to be applied in other co-authorship networks in subdisciplines of the Earth Sciences, and its results are discussed in this sense. The results of this research offer valuable information for the management of scientific collaboration programs, the selection of representatives and to weigh the possibilities and needs of the Iberian network. But, especially, it presents a socioscientific framework of reference for early career scientists and makes them aware of the need to integrate themselves into a booming scientific community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

C. García-Hernández, University of Oviedo

Department of Geography (University of Oviedo)

References

Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., Hossain, L. 2011. Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics 5 (4), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.007.

Alonso-Zarza, A.M., Álvarez-Marrón, J., Calonge, A., Díaz, C., Díez-Balda, M.A., Gil-Peña, I., Gómez, M.I. 2008. Mujeres y geología en España. In: Mesa redonda. VII Congreso Geológico de España. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Geotemas, 589.

Ávila-Toscano, J.H., Marenco-Escuderos, A., Madariaga Orozco, C. 2014. Indicadores bibliométricos, redes de coautorías y colaboración institucional en revistas colombianas de psicología. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana 32 (1), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.1.2014.12.

Barabási, A.L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A. 311, 590-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7.

Bordons, M., Gómez, I. 2000. Collaboration networks in science. In: B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.). The Web of Knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, Information Today, pp. 197-213.

Bose, I., Mahapatra, R.K. 2001. Business data mining - a machine learning perspective. Information & Management 39 (3), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00091-X.

Ceci, S.J., Ginther, D.K., Kahn, S., Williams, W.M. 2014. Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3), 75-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.

Burt, R.S. 1995. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Crane, D. 1969. Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. American Sociological Review 34, 335-353. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092499.

Filippo, D., Levin, L. 2015. Estudio de la producción Ibérica en Biblioteconomía y Documentación a través del análisis de Comunidades Bibliográficas. In: Desafíos y oportunidades de las Ciencias de la Información y la Documentación en la era digital: actas del VII Encuentro Ibérico EDICIC 2015 (Madrid, 16 y 17 de noviembre de 2015). Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.

García-Ruiz, J.M. 1999. La producción científica de la Geomorfología española y su impacto, a través de las publicaciones periódicas. Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Zaragoza.

García-Ruiz, J.M. 2008. Las citas internacionales de las revistas españolas de Geografía. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 46, 207-225. http://age.ieg.csic.es/boletin/46/11-LAS%20CITAS.pdf.

Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Czerwon, H.J. 1999. A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995). Scientometrics 45 (2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458432.

Glass, C., Cook, A. 2016. Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly 27 (1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003.

Goh, K.I., Oh, E., Kahng, B., Kim, D. 2003. Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. Physical Review E 67, 017-101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.017101.

Gómez-Ortiz, A., González-Martín, J.A. 1988. Geomorfología periglaciar: desde una visión histórica hacia nuevas perspectivas. In: M. Gutiérrez Elorza, J.L. Peña Monné (Eds.), Perspectivas en Geomorfología. SEG, Zaragoza, pp. 79-94.

Gómez-Ortiz, A., Palacios, D. 1995. La investigación española sobre geomorfología de regiones frías. Áreas geográficas, estudios actuales y resultados. Revista de Geografía 29 (1), 7-19. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/RevistaGeografia/article/view/50289.

Gómez-Ortiz, A., Martí-Bono, C.E., Salvador, F. 2001. Evolución reciente de la Geomorfología glaciar y periglaciar en España (1980-2000), balance y perspectivas. In: A. Gómez-Ortiz, A. Pérez-González (Eds.), Evolución reciente de la Geomorfología española (1980-2000). Geoforma, Logroño, pp. 139-184.

Gómez-Ortiz, A., Palacios Estremera, D., Salvador Franch, F. 2003. La investigación reciente en Geomorfología Periglaciar en España. La labor de la IPA-España. Scripta Nova 7 (155), 133-156. http://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/sn-155.htm.

Gutiérrez, F., Harvey, A., García-Ruiz, J.M., Silva, P., Cendrero, A. 2013. Geomorphological research in Spain. Geomorphology 196, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.014.

Gupta, V., Lehal, G.S. 2009. A survey of text mining techniques and applications. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 1 (1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.4304/jetwi.1.1.60-76.

Haythornthwaite, C. 2006. Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (8), 1079-1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20371.

Holmes, M.A., O'Connell, S., Frey, C., Ongley, L. 2008. Gender imbalance in US geoscience academia. Nature Geoscience 1 (2), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo113.

Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.

Kosoko-Lasaki, O., Sonnino, R.E., Voytko, M.L. 2006. Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education. Journal of the National Medical Association 98 (9), 1449. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8cbf/f61aa43d95e4d354f56acccc5f94f286cbb0.pdf.

Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., Sugimoto, C.R. 2016. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science 46 (3), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046.

Lasanta, T., García-Ruiz, J.M. 2013. La producción de la geografía española a través de las bases de datos de Scopus e ISI Web of Knowledge. In: T. Lasanta-Martínez, J. Martín-Vide (Coords.), La Investigación Geográfica en España (1990-2012). Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (CSIC), Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (CSIC), Madrid, pp. 221-234. http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/88158/1/Publicaciones%20de%20geografos%20espa%C3%B1oles.pdf.

López-Ontiveros, A., Molinero, F. 1995. Evolución reciente de la investigación geográfica española. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles (21-22), 119-132.

Martins, D. 2011. A emergência da análise de redes sociais como campo de pesquisa: perspetiva da análise da produção científica em português e espanhol a partir do Google académico, Alexandria: Revista de Ciencias de la Informacion, 5 (8), 17-29. http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/alexandria/article/view/214/208.

Molina, J.L., Muñoz-Justicia, J.M., Domènech I-Argemí, M. 2002. Redes de publicaciones científicas: un análisis de la estructura de coautorías. Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 1, 3-31. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.29.

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 2016. Datos y Cifras del Sistema Universitario Español. Curso 2015-2016. Available at: https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es (last access: 24/04/2019).

Newman, M.E. 2000. Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101, 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026485807148.

Newman, M.E. 2001a. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results, Physical Review 64, 01613-1-8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.

Newman, M.E. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS 98, 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.021544898.

Newman, M.E. 2004. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS 101, 5200-5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100.

Ngai, E.W.T., Xiu, L., Chau, D.C.K. 2009. Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.021.

Paderewski-Rodríguez, P., García-Arenas, M.I., Gil-Iranzo, R.M., González, C.S., Ortigosa, E.M., Padilla-Zea, N. 2017. Initiatives and strategies to encourage women into engineering. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje 12 (2), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2017.2698719.

Peña-Monné, J.L. 1998. Los estudios sobre procesos de clima frío en España: balance y perspectivas. In: A. Gómez-Ortiz, F. Salvador, L. Schulte, A. García (Eds.), Procesos biofísicos actuales en medios fríos. Universitat de Barcelona. Barcelona, pp. 43-54.

Pereira, D., Díaz, C. 2016. Are women properly represented in scientific publication and research? Interim results from a Spanish case study in Earth Sciences. Episodes: Journal of International Geoscience 39 (1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i1/89237.

Price, D.J.S. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science 149, 510-515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510.

Price, D.J.S. 1966. Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist 21, 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024051.

Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E.W. 2001. Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams. Organization Science 12, 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637.

Scott, J. 2012. Social network analysis. Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1800-9_178.

Serrano, E. 2016. Periglaciarismo y permafrost. Polígonos. Revista de Geografía 28, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.18002/pol.v0i28.4283.

Valderrama-Zurián, J.C., González-Alcaide, G., Valderrama-Zurián, F.J., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Miguel-Dasit, A. 2007. Redes de coautorías y colaboración institucional en Revista Española de Cardiología. Revista Española de Cardiología 60 (2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1157/13099458.

Varanda, M., Rego, R., Fontes, B., Eichner, K. 2012. A análise de redes sociais no mundo lusófono: contributos para o conhecimento de uma comunidade científica em desenvolvimento. Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 22, 147-188. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.434.

Vargiu, E., Urru, M. 2012. Exploiting web scraping in a collaborative filtering-based approach to web advertising. Artificial Intelligence Research 2 (1), 44. https://doi.org/10.5430/air.v2n1p44.

Wagner, C.S. 2005. Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics 62 (1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0001-0.

Wagner, C., Leydesdorff, L. 2003. Seismology as a case study of distributed collaboration in science. Scientometrics 58, 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025479524390.

Wagner, C.S., Whetsell, T.A., Leydesdorff, L. 2017. Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics 110 (3), 1633-1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9.

Wasserman, S., Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478.

Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'Small-World' networks. Nature 393, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918.