Effects of ploughing and mulching on soil and organic matter losses after a wildfire in Central Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.3768Keywords:
ploughing, mulch, soil erosion, organic matter, wildfireAbstract
Forest wildfires typically increase runoff and associated soil and organic matter losses. Both ploughing and mulching with forest residues have been applied in recently burnt areas in Portugal to mitigate these effects in soil erosion, but their effectiveness has never been compared directly. To this end, soil and organic matter losses by water after a wildfire were studied in two eucalypt plantations in central Portugal that had been affected by the same wildfire (August 2015). One of the sites was instrumented with six erosion plots (2 m by 8 m), divided over two blocks with one treatment per block: control (doing nothing) and ploughing to 0.2 m depth with a tracked excavator. The other site was instrumented with nine erosion plots, divided over three blocks with three treatments in each block: control (doing nothing) and mulching with forest logging residues at reduced (2.6 Mg ha-1) and standard application rates (8 Mg ha-1). Mulching was performed one month after the wildfire, whereas ploughing took place one year after the wildfire. For this study, soil and organic matter losses were monitored at 12 occasions from July 2016 to May 2017, roughly coinciding with the second post-fire year. Over this relatively dry period sediment losses at the control plots of both ploughed and mulched sites averaged 1.6 and 0.6 Mg ha-1 respectively. The corresponding losses of the ploughed plots were 19% lower, whereas those of the mulched plots were 67 and 93% lower at the reduced and standard mulch rates, respectively. The organic matter content of the eroded sediments was 22% in the unploughed plots, and ploughing reduced this figure in half, which could be explained by the inversion of the topsoil horizons by the excavator. Mulching at the standard application rate seemed to produce a clear enrichment in organic matter content compared to mulching at the reduced rate as well as doing nothing (25 vs. 16 and 14%). The two main findings of this research were that i) erosion rates exceeded the 1 Mg ha-1 tolerable soil loss during the second post-fire year, indicating that mitigation measures have to be implemented, ii) ploughing was clearly less suited for mitigating post-fire erosion than mulching with forest logging residues, even at application rates as low as that typically used in operational post-fire emergency stabilization with straw mulching.
Downloads
References
APHA (American Public Health Association) 2005. Total suspended solids dried ate 103-105ºC, method 2540D. In: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st Edition, pp. 11.
Abrantes, J.R.C.B., Prats, S.A., Keizer, J.J., de Lima, J.L.M.P. 2018. Effectiveness of rice straw mulching strips in reducing runoff and soil loss: Laboratory soil flume experiments under simulated rainfall. Soil and Tillage Research 180, 238-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.03.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.03.015
Badia, D., Marti, C. 2000. Seeding and mulching treatments as conservation measures of two burned soils in the central Ebro valley, NE Spain. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 13, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/089030600406635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/089030600406635
Cairney, J.W.G., Bastias, B.A. 2007. Influences of fire on forest soil fungal communities Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-190
Cerdà, A., Doerr, S.H. 2008. The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period. Catena 74, 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.03.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.03.010
De Figueiredo, T., Fonseca, F., Martins, A. 2012. Soil loss and run-off in young forest stands affected by site preparation technique: a study in NE Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research 131, 1747-1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0581-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0581-6
Fernández, C., Vega, J.A. 2014. Efficacy of bark strands and straw mulching after wildfire in NW Spain: effects on erosion control and vegetation recovery. Ecological Engineering 63, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.005
Fernández, C., Vega, J.A., Fontúrbel, T. 2016. Reducing post-fire soil erosion from the air: Performance of heli-mulching in a mountainous area on the coast of NWSpain. Catena 147, 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.08.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.08.005
Ferreira, A.J.D., Coelho, C.O.A., Shakesby, R.A., Walsh, R.P.D. 1997. Sediment and solute yield in forest ecosystems affected by fire and rip-ploughing techniques, central Portugal: a plot and catchment analysis approach. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 22, 309-314. https://doi.org/S0079-1946(97)00150-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-1946(97)00150-X
Francos, M., Pereira, P., Alcañiz, M., Mataix-Solera, J., Úbeda, X. 2016. Impact of an intense rainfall event on soil properties following a wildfire in a Mediterranean environment (North-East Spain). Science of the Total Environment 572, 1353-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.145
Hueso-González, P., Martínez-Murillo, J.F., Ruiz-Sinoga, J.D. 2017. Benefits of adding forestry clearance residues for the soil and vegetation of a Mediterranean mountain forest. Science of the Total Environment 615, 796-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.301
ICNF – Institute of Nature Conservation and Forestry of Portugal. 2015. Emergency Stabilization Report. Wildfires of Vale de Colmeias and Ribas de Cima. Acessed on December 2016 from http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/dfci/relat/raa/ree-2015.
IUSS-WBR, (International Union of Soil Sciences-World References Bases for Soil Resources). 2014. World Soil Resources Report, Reports No. 106 (update 2015). Rome: FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Rome.
Jourgholami, M., Abari, M.E. 2017. Effectiveness of sawdust and straw mulching on postharvest runoff and soil erosion of a skid trail in a mixed forest. Ecological Engineering 109, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.009
Keizer, J.J., Silva, F.C., Vieira, D.C.S., Gonzalez-Pelayo, O., Campos, I.M.A.N., Vieira, A., Prats, S.A. 2018. The effectiveness of two contrasting mulch application rates to reduce post-fire erosion in a Portuguese eucalypt plantation. Catena 169, 21-30. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.catena.2018.05.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.05.029
Kramer, C.Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12, 307-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001469
Malvar, M.C., Prats, S.A., Keizer, J.J. 2016. Runoff and inter-rill erosion affected by wildfire and pre-fire ploughing in eucalypt plantations of north-central Portugal. Land Degradation and Development 27, 1366-1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2365
Martins, M.A.S., Machado, A.I., Serpa, D., Prats, S.A., Faria, S.R., Varela, M.E.T., González-Pelayo, O., Keizer, J.J. 2013. Runoff and inter-rill erosion in a maritime pine and eucalypt plantation following wildfire and terracing in north-central Portugal. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics 61, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2013-0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2013-0033
Neto, M.S., Scopel, E., Corbeels, M., Cardoso, A.N., Douzet, J-M., Feller, C., Piccolo, M.C., Cerri, C.C., Bernoux, M. 2010. Soil carbon stocks under no-tillage mulch-based cropping systems in the Brazilian Cerrado: An on-farm synchronic assessment. Soil and Tillage Research 110, 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.07.010
Padilha, J., Bertol, I., Magro, B.A., Bagio, B., Marioti, J., Ramos, J.C. 2017. Water erosion under three tillage methods in a cultivation of Eucalyptus benthamii. Revista Árvore 41. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9088201700600006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882017000600006
Pereira, V., FitzPatrick, E.A. 1995. Cambisoils and related soils in north-central Portugal: their genesis and classification. Geoderma 66, 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00076-m. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)00076-M
Polyakov, V.O., Lal, R. 2008. Soil organic matter and CO2 emission as affected by water erosion on field runoff plots. Geoderma 143, 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.005
Prats, S.A., MacDonald, L.H., Monteiro, M., Ferreira, A.J.D., Coelho, C.O.A., Keizer, J.J. 2012. Effectiveness of forest residue mulching in reducing post-fire runoff and erosion in a pine and eucalyptus plantation in north-central Portugal. Geoderma 191, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.009
Prats, S.A., Malvar, M.C., Martins, M.A.S., Keizer, J.J. 2014a. Post-fire soil erosion mitigation: a review of the last research and techniques developed in Portugal. Cuadernos de Investigatión Geográfica 40,403-428. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2519
Prats, S.A., Martins, M.A.S., Malvar, M.C., Ben-Hur, M., Keizer, J.J. 2014b. Polyacrylamide application versus forest residue mulching for reducing post-fire runoff and soil erosion. Science of the Total Environment 468-469, 464-474. https://doi.org/j.scitotenv.2013.08.066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.066
Prats, S.A., Wagenbrenner, J.W., Martins, M.A.S., Malvar, M.C., Keizer, J.J. 2016. Mid-term and scaling effects of forest residue mulching on post-fire runoff and soil erosion. Science of the Total Environment 573, 1242-1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.064
Prats, S.A., Abrantes, J.R.C.B., Keizer,J.J., de Lima, J.L.M.P. 2017. Runoff and soil erosion mitigation with sieved forest residue mulch strips under controlled laboratory conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 396, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.019
Pribyl, D.W. 2010. A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 156, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.003
Robichaud, P.R., Beyers, J.L., Neary, D.G. 2000. Evaluating the effectiveness of postfire rehabilitation treatments. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-63:89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-63
Robichaud, P.R., Wagenbrenner, J.W., Lewis, S.L., Ashmun, L.E., Brown, R.E., Wohlgemuth, P.M. 2013. Post-fire mulching for runoff and erosion mitigation part II: effectiveness in reducing runoff and sediment yields from small catchments. Catena 105, 93-111. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.catena.2012.11.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.11.016
Shakesby, R.A., Boakes, D.J., Coelho, C.O.A., Gonçalves, A.J.B., Walsh, R.P.D. 1996. Limiting the soil degradational impacts of wildfire in pine and eucalyptus forests in Portugal. Applied Geography 16, 337-355. https://doi.org/0143-6228(96)00022-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6228(96)00022-7
Shakesby, R.A., Doerr, S.H. 2006. Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent. Earth-Science Reviews 74, 269-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006
Shakesby, R.A. 2011. Post-wildfire soil erosion in the Mediterranean: Review and future research directions. Earth-Sciences Reviews 105, 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.001
Verheijen, F.G.A., Jones, R.J.A., Rickson, R.J., Smith, C.J. 2009. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates Europe. Earth-Science Reviews 94, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.02.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 A.R. Lopes, S.A. Prats, F.C. Silva, J.J. Keizer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica / Geographical Research Letters the first publication. They are free to share and redistribute the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License




