Discussing the Feminist Agenda in Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Novels
"The Handmaid’s Tale" and "MaddAddam"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.4809Keywords:
Atwood, Feminist Dystopia, Endings and Dystopias, Transgressive UtopiasAbstract
In this article, an analysis is made of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) and MaddAddam (2013) from a gendered and generic perspective. The Handmaid’s Tale was one of the novels that marked the dystopian turn in the 1980s writing of fiction, while MaddAddam is, for some critics, a feminist critical dystopia in which the ending retains hope for a better future. Consequently, both novels belong a priori to a specific branch of the dystopian genre: the feminist dystopian novel. However, some ambiguity or even contradictory readings can be inferred in both texts. This article explores The Handmaid’s Tale and MaddAddam’s portrayal of women and their acts of resistance in order to assess these texts’ liberatory or still inherently conservative messages of their endings, especially regarding women.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. M. 2012. The Machine, The Victim, And the Third Thing: Navigating the Gender Spectrum In Margaret Atwood’s Oryx And Crake And The Year Of The Flood. Ph. D. thesis. University of Central Florida: USA. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2362 (Accessed 10 December 2022).
Atwood, M. 1996 (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. London: Vintage.
Atwood, M. 2003. Oryx and Crake. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Atwood, M. 2004. “The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake in Context”. PMLA 119 (3): 513-517.
Atwood, M. 2011. In other Worlds. SF and the Human Imagination. New York: Virago.
Atwood, M. 2013 (2009). The Year of the Flood. London: Virago.
Atwood, M. 2014 (2013). MaddAddam. New York: Anchor Books.
Atwood, M. 2022. Burning Questions. New York: Doubleday.
Benhabib, S. 2015. The Claims of Culture. Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princenton University Press.
Bolton, M. J. 2010. “This is the Way the World Ends: Margaret Atwood and the Dystopian Impulse”. Critical Insights. The Handmaid’s Tale. Ed. J. B. Bouson. New York: Salem Press. 59-73.
Bouson, J. B. 2010. Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Salem Press.
Bouson, J. B. 2011. “We’re Using Up the Earth. It’s Almost Gone: A Return No the PostApocalyptic Future in Margaret Atwood’s The Year of the Flood”. The Journal of Commonwealth Culture 46 (1): 9-26.
Caminero-Santangelo, M. 1994. “Moving Beyond ‘the Blank White Spaces’: Atwood’s Gilead, Postmodernism, and Strategic Resistance”. Studies in Canadian Literature 19 (1). Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/SCL/article/view/8192/9249.
Cavalcanty, I. 2000. “Utopias of/f Language in Contemporary Feminist Literary Dystopias”. Utopian Studies 11: 152-80.
Colebrook, C. 2014. Sex After Life. Essays on Extinction, Vol. 2. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.
Davidson, A. E. 1988. “Future Tense Making History in The Handmaid’s Tale”. Margaret Atwood Visions and Forms. Eds. K. Van Spanckeren and J. Garden Castro. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. 113-121.
Davies, M. 2006. “Margaret Atwood's Female Bodies”. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. C. A. Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 58-71.
Ehrenreich, B. 2004. “Feminist Dystopia". Bloom Guides: Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Ed. H. Bloom. Broomall: Chelsea House Publishers. 78-80.
Greene, G. 1987. “Choice of Evils, The Women’s Review of Books”. Contemporary Literary Criticism 44: 14-15.
Haraway, D. 2016 (1985). A Cyborg Manifesto. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Howells, C. A. 2000. “Transgressing Genre: A Generic Approach to Margaret Atwood’s Novels”. Margaret Atwood’s Works & Impact. Ed. R. M. Nischik. London: Camden House. 139-156.
Howells, C. A. 2008. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake”. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Ed. C. A. Howells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 161-175.
Johnson, J. 1986. “Margaret Atwood’s Brave New World”. The Washington Post, 2 February.
Lehmann-Haupt, C. 1986. “Books of the Times: The Handmaid’s Tale”. The New York Times, 27 January.
Malik, A. 1987. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and the Dystopian Tradition”. Canadian Literature 112: 9-17.
McCarthy, M. 1986. “Breeders, Wives, and Unwomen: The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood”. The New York Times, 7 February.
Mohr, D. M. 2007. “Transgressive Utopian Dystopias: The Postmodern Reappearance of Utopia in the Disguise of Dystopia”. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture 55 (1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2007-0103
Moylan, T. 2000. Scraps of the Untainted Sky. Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Oxford: Westview.
Moylan, T. and R. Baccolini, eds. 2007. Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming. Bern: Peter Lang.
Raschke, D. 2014. “Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy: Postmodernism, Apocalypse, and Rapture”. Studies in Canadian Literature / Etudes en litterature canadienne 39 (2): 22-44.
Richardson, B. 2018. “Unnatural Endings in Fiction and Drama”. Contemporary Narrative Theories. Eds. Z. Dinnen and R. Warhol. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Somacarrera Íñigo, P. 2021. Poder y monstruosidad en la narrativa de Margaret Atwood. Seville: Aula Magna McGraw-Hill.
Squier, S. 1994. Babies in Bottles. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Stein, K. 2013. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Scheherazade in Dystopia”. Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale. Ed. J. B. Bouson. Ipswich: Salem Press. 313-333.
Tolan, F. 2007. Margaret Atwood, Feminism and Fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Vickroy, L. 2013. “Sexual Trauma, Ethics, and the Reader in the World of Margaret Atwood”. Margaret Atwood Critical Insights. Ed. J. B. Bouson. Ipswich: Salem Press. 254-75.
Wisker, G. 2012. Margaret Atwood: An Introduction to Critical Views of Her Fiction. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Esther Muñoz González
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Journal of English Studies the first publication. They are free to share, redistribute, and/or reprint the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
