Avons-nous réellement perdu la raison ? Sur les formes et les fonctions communicatives des questions rhétoriques dans les publications sur X relatives à la guerre de Gaza
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.7240Mots-clés :
questions rhétoriques, force illocutoire, discours sur les réseaux sociaux, X (Twitter), guerre de GazaRésumé
Cet article examine l’utilisation des questions rhétoriques sur le réseau social X (anciennement Twitter) par Francesca Albanese (fonctionnaire des Nations unies) et Eylon Levy (ancien fonctionnaire du gouvernement israélien), dans des publications relatives à la guerre de Gaza. L’analyse, principalement qualitative et inscrite dans le cadre de la théorie des actes de langage, explore les principales formes et fonctions communicatives des questions rhétoriques ainsi que leur rôle potentiel dans la promotion de récits opposés concernant le conflit. Les résultats indiquent que, malgré des points de vue diamétralement opposés, les deux individus utilisent des formes similaires de questions rhétoriques, les adressant majoritairement au grand public, la critique constituant la force illocutoire prédominante dans les deux corpus, suivie de l’accusation et de la moquerie. Dans l’ensemble, les résultats montrent que les questions rhétoriques constituent un outil pragmatique pertinent pour façonner des récits et pour engager et influencer le public dans un discours relatifs aux conflits sur les réseaux sociaux.
Téléchargements
Références
AL-DAKHS, D., AMBREEN, F., ZAHEER, M. and GUSAROVA, Y. (2019). “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Criticizing in University Teacher-student Talk: The Case of English as a Lingua Franca.” Pragmatics, 29(4): 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eld DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eld
ATHANASIADOU, A. (2023). “Constructions in Verbal Irony Production: The Case of Rhetorical Questions.” In R.W. Gibbs and H.L. Colston (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought. Cambridge: CUP, pp. 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974004.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974004.012
AUSTIN, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.
BADARNEH, M. A. (2009). “Exploring the Use of Rhetorical Questions in Editorial Discourse: A Case Study of Arabic Editorials.” Text & Talk, 29(6): 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.033
BASTOS, M. T. and MERCEA, D. (2017). “The Brexit Botnet and User-generated Hyperpartisan news.” Social Science Computer Review, 37(1): 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157
BESSI, A. and FERRARA, E. (2016). “Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion.” First Monday, 21(11). Online document. November 2016. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2982233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
BIEZMA, M. and RAWLINS, K. (2017). “Rhetorical Questions: Severing Asking from Questioning.” In D. Burgdorf, J. Collard, S. Maspong and B. Stefansdottir (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 27. New York: Linguistic Society of America, pp. 302-322. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4155
BLANKENSHIP, K. and CRAIG, T. Y. (2006). “Rhetorical Question Use and Resistance to Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Analysis.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(2): 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06286380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06286380
BROWN, P. and LEVINSON, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
CAPONIGRO, I. and SPROUSE, J. (2007). “Rhetorical Questions as Questions.” In E. Puig-Waldmüller (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, pp. 121-133. Available at https://ojs.ub.unikonstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/635/570
CEROVIĆ, M. (2016). “When Suspects Ask Questions: Rhetorical Questions as a Challenging Device.” Journal of Pragmatics, 105: 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.010
CONTI, L. (2025). “The Pragmatics of Rhetorical Questions in Sophocles’ Tragedies: An Analysis of Antigone and Electra.” In J. Villa, A. Striano and R. Verano (eds.) Advances in Ancient Greek Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111648644-036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111648644-036
FARKAS, D. (2025). “Rhetorical Questions Revisited.” Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, 60(1): 139-173.
FILIK, R., TURCAN, A., RALPH-NEARMAN, C. and PITIOT, A. (2019). “What Is the Difference between Irony and Sarcasm? An fMRI Study.” Cortex, 115: 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.025
FRANK, J. (1990). “You Call that a Rhetorical Question? Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90003-V DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90003-V
HAN, C. H. (2002). “Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions.” Lingua, 112: 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4
ILIE, C. (1999). “Question-response Argumentation in Talk Shows.” Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8): 975-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00056-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00056-9
KAUFFELD, F. J. (1998). “Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing.“ Argumentation, 12: 245-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007704116379
KLEINKE, S. (2012). “Responses to Rhetorical Questions in English and German Internet public news groups.” Functions of Language, 19(2): 174-200. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.19.2.02kle DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.19.2.02kle
KUMAR, S., MORSTATTER, F. and LIU, H. (2014). Twitter Data Analytics. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9372-3
LIU, S. (2004). Pragmatic Strategies and Power Relations in Disagreement: Chinese Culture in Higher Education. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.
MC GREGOR, S. C., MOURAO, R. R. and MOLYNEUX, L. (2017). “Twitter as a Tool for and Object of Political and Electoral Activity: Considering Electoral Context and Variance.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(2): 154-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1308289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1308289
MOSHAVI, A. (2009). “Two Types of Argumentation Involving Rhetorical Questions in Biblical Hebrew Dialogue.” Biblica, 90(1): 32-46.
NEITSCH, J. and NIEBUHR, O. (2022). “Research on Rhetorical Devices in German: The Use of Rhetorical Questions in Sales Presentations.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51: 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09874-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09874-8
ORABY, S., HARRISON, V., MISRA, A., RILOFF, E. and WALKER, M. (2017). “Are You Serious? Rhetorical Questions and Sarcasm in Social Media Dialog.” In K. Jokinen, M. Stede, D. DeVault and A. Louis (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue. Saarbrücken: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 310-319. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5537
OTT, B. L. (2016). “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1): 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
POPA-WYATT, M. (2017). “Compound Figures: Priority and Speech-act Structure.” Philosophical Studies, 174: 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0629-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0629-z
QUIRK, R., GREENBAUM, S., LEECH, G. and SVARTVIK, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
RAMOS, L. and CHANG, O. (2023). “Sentiment Analysis of Russia-Ukraine Conflict Tweets Using RoBERTa.” Uniciencia, 37(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.23
RANGANATH, S., HU, X., TANG, J., WANG, S. and LIU, H. (2017). “Understanding and Identifying Rhetorical Questions in Social Media.” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 9(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3108364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3108364
ROBERTS, R. M. and KREUZ, R. J. (1994). “Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” Psychological Science, 5: 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x
ROHDE, H. (2006). “Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives.” San Diego Linguistics Papers, 2: 134-168. Available at http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~hrohde/papers/Rohde.sdlp.paper.2006.pdf
van ROOY, R. (2003). “Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance.” Journal of Semantics, 20: 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/20.3.239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/20.3.239
SAFONT-JORDA, M. P. (2008). “The Speech Act of Requesting. In E.Alcon-Soler (ed.) Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 41-64.
SCHAFFER, D. (2005). “Can Rhetorical Questions Function as Retorts? Is the Pope Catholic?” Journal of Pragmatics, 37: 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.12.007
SEARLE, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
SEARLE, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213
SHARODA, P. A., HONG, L. and CHI, E. H. (2011). “Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Coference on Web and Social Media, 5(1): 578-581. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14165
ŠPAGO, Dž. (2024). “When Rhetorical Questions Receive Answers: On Different Types of Answers to Rhetorical Questions in US Presidential Debates.” Anuario de Estudios Filológicos, 47: 277-306. https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.47.277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17398/2660-7301.47.277
TAO, W. and PENG, Y. (2023). “Differentiation and Unity: A Cross-platform Comparison Analysis of Online Posts’ Semantics of the Russian-Ukrainian War Based on Weibo and Twitter.” Communication and the Public, 8(2): 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231165563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231165563
TOPLAK, M. and KATZ, A. N. (2000). “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10): 1467-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0
WANG, Z. and CASKEY, K. (2016). “#Occupywallstreet: An Analysis of Twitter Usage during a Protest Movement.” Social Networking, 5(4): 101-117. https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2016.54011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2016.54011
WILKINS, D. J., LIVINGSTONE, A. G. and LEVINE, M. (2019). “Whose Tweets? The Rhetorical Functions of Social Media Use in Developing the Black Lives Matter Movement.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4): 786-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12318
WITEK, M. (2022). “An Austian Alternative to the Gricean Perspective on Meaning and Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics, 201: 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.010
ZHUANG, Y. and RILOFF, E. (2020). “Exploring the Role of Context to Distinguish Rhetorical and Information-seeking Questions.” In S. Rijhwani, J. Liu, Y. Wang and R. Dror (eds.) Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, pp. 306-312. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-srw.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-srw.41
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Džemal Špago 2026

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Les articles appartiennent à leurs auteurs respectifs qui accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l’autorisation de la revue n’étant pas nécessaire pour leur diffusion une fois publiés. Une fois la version de l’éditeur publiée, l’auteur est tenu de s’y référer dans les versions archivées dans les dépôts personnels ou institutionnels.
Il est conseillé aux auteurs/s d’archiver la version de l’éditeur dans des dépôts institutionnels.
La revue permettant à d'autres de réutiliser les ouvrages selon les conditions de la licence CC Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)





