Towards Chronotopia: The Dimensional Complexity of Bakhtin’s Chronotope

Hans Färnlöf

doi:10.18172/cif.6981

Autores/as

Hans Färnlöf Stockholm University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5327-4481

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.6981

Palabras clave:

Bajtín, Cronotopo, género literario, vertical, horizontal, convencional

Resumen

Este artículo propone una reevaluación del cronotopo de Bajtín. Si bien se reconoce plenamente su enfoque general (que promueve una reflexión sobre la asimilación de una cosmovisión a través de la narrativa), se cuestiona su visión sintética de las complejas relaciones existentes entre el cronotopo, el género literario y la narrativa individual. Partiendo de la concepción del cronotopo como expresión de la unidad de los textos de ficción, este artículo se centra en el estudio de la complejidad dimensional que puede existir en cualquier narrativa literaria. Esta metodología modificada se inspira en el propio análisis de Bajtín, que sugiere que tres dimensiones del cronotopo —vertical, horizontal y convencional — pueden manifestarse de diversas maneras en el texto literario, tanto ideológica como poéticamente. Breves comentarios sobre algunas narrativas clásicas sugieren que la interacción dimensional, denominada cronotopía, podría tender hacia una narrativa más monológica (cohesiva) o dialógica (compleja).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

BAKHTIN, M. (1981). “Forms of time and chronotope in the novel.” In Holquist, M. and Emerson, C. (eds.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Texas, University of Texas Press, 84-258.

BEMONG, N. and BORGHART, P. (2010). “Bakhtin’s theory of the literary chronotope: reflections, applications, perspectives.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 3-16.

BEMONG, N., BORGHART, P., DE DOBBELEER, M., DEMOEN, K., DE TEMMERMAN, K. and KEUNEN, B. (eds.) (2010). Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_377572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_377572

FALCONER, R. (2010). “Heterochronic Representations of the Fall: Bakhtin, Milton, DeLillo.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 111-130.

GENETTE, G. (1997). Palimpsests. Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.

HOLQUIST, M. (1982). “Bakhtin and Rabelais: Theory as Praxis.” Boundary 2, 11(1/2): 5-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/303015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/303015

HÜHN, P., PIER, J. and SCHMID, W. (eds.) (2023). Handbook of Diachronic Narratology. Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110617481

JAKOBSON, R. (1978) “The Dominant.” In Matejka, L. and Pomorska, K. (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views. Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 82-87.

KEUNEN, B. (2000). “Bakhtin, Genre Formation, and the Cognitive Turn: Chronotopes as Memory Schemata.” CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1069

KEUNEN, B. (2011). Time and Imagination: Chronotopes in Western Narrative Culture. Evanston, Northwestern University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv4cbg3n

LADIN, J. (2010). “’It was not Death’: The Poetic Career of the Chronotope.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 131-155.

LANSER, S. and RIMMON-KENAN, S. (2022). “The Postclassical Chronotope: A Narratological Inquiry.” Poetics Today, 43(3): 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9780375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9780375

MITTERAND, H. (1990). “Chronotopies romanesques: Germinal.” Poétique, 81: 89-104.

MORSON, G. (2010). “The Chronotope of Humanness: Bakhtin and Dostoevsky.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 93-110.

PECHEY, G. (1998). “Modernity and Chronotopicity in Bakhtin.” In Shepherd, D. (ed.), In The Contexts of Bakhtin: Philosophy, Authorship, Aesthetics. London and New York, Routledge, 173-82.

PUSHKIN, M. (2017). “Critical Analysis of Bakhtin’s Chronotope.” Humanitas, 5(10): 435-447. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.356222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.356222

RITELLA, G., RAJALA, A. and RENSHAW, P. (2021). “Using chronotope to research the space-time relations of learning and education: Dimensions of the unit of analysis.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100381

SCHOLZ, B. (1998). “Bakhtin’s Concept of ‘Chronotope’: The Kantian Connection.” In Shepherd, D. (ed.), The Contexts of Bakhtin: Philosophy, Authorship, Aesthetics. London and New York, Routledge, 141-172.

SCHULTZ, M., MAGUIRE, S., LANGLEY, A. and TSOUKAS, H. (eds.) (2012). Constructing Identity in and around Organizations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213493891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640997.001.0001

SPODE, H. (2010). “Time, space, and tourism.” In Eberhard, W. and Lübke, C. (eds.), The Plurality of Europe. Identities and Spaces. Leipzig, Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 233-246.

STEINBY, L. (2013). “Bakhtin’s Concept of the Chronotope: the Viewpoint of an Acting Subject.” In Steinby, L. and Tintti, T. (eds.), Bakhtin and his Others. (Inter)subjectivity, Chronotope, Dialogism. London, Anthem Press, 105-125. https://doi.org/10.7135/9780857283108.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/9780857283108.009

TODOROV, T. (1973). The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. New York, Cornell University Press.

ZORAN, G. (1984). “Towards a Theory of Space in Narrative.” Poetics Today, 5(2): 309-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1771935