Towards Chronotopia
The Dimensional Complexity of Bakhtin’s Chronotope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.6981Keywords:
Bakhtin, chronotope, literary genre, vertical, horizontal, conventionalAbstract
This article advocates a review of Bakhtin’s chronotope. Whilst Bakhtin’s general approach (promoting reflections on the investigation of a worldview put into narrative form) is fully acknowledged, doubt is cast upon his synthetic view of the complex relations that exist between the chronotope, the literary genre, and the individual narrative. Moving away from an understanding of the chronotope as the expression of the unity of novelistic texts, this article favours the study of the dimensional complexity that can exist in any literary narrative. The modified methodology is inspired by Bakhtin’s own analysis, which suggests that three dimensions of the chronotope–vertical, horizontal, and conventional–can appear in various degrees and combinations in the literary text, both on the ideological and the poetic level. The brief commentaries on some classic literary texts suggest that the dimensional interplay, termed chronotopia, may tend towards a more monological (cohesive) or dialogical (complex) narrative.
Downloads
References
BAKHTIN, M. (1981). “Forms of time and chronotope in the novel.” In Holquist, M. and Emerson, C. (eds.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Texas, University of Texas Press, 84-258.
BEMONG, N. and BORGHART, P. (2010). “Bakhtin’s theory of the literary chronotope: reflections, applications, perspectives.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 3-16.
BEMONG, N., BORGHART, P., DE DOBBELEER, M., DEMOEN, K., DE TEMMERMAN, K. and KEUNEN, B. (eds.) (2010). Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_377572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_377572
FALCONER, R. (2010). “Heterochronic Representations of the Fall: Bakhtin, Milton, DeLillo.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 111-130.
GENETTE, G. (1997). Palimpsests. Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.
HOLQUIST, M. (1982). “Bakhtin and Rabelais: Theory as Praxis.” Boundary 2, 11(1/2): 5-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/303015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/303015
HÜHN, P., PIER, J. and SCHMID, W. (eds.) (2023). Handbook of Diachronic Narratology. Berlin, De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110617481
JAKOBSON, R. (1978) “The Dominant.” In Matejka, L. and Pomorska, K. (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views. Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 82-87.
KEUNEN, B. (2000). “Bakhtin, Genre Formation, and the Cognitive Turn: Chronotopes as Memory Schemata.” CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1069
KEUNEN, B. (2011). Time and Imagination: Chronotopes in Western Narrative Culture. Evanston, Northwestern University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv4cbg3n
LADIN, J. (2010). “’It was not Death’: The Poetic Career of the Chronotope.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 131-155.
LANSER, S. and RIMMON-KENAN, S. (2022). “The Postclassical Chronotope: A Narratological Inquiry.” Poetics Today, 43(3): 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9780375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9780375
MITTERAND, H. (1990). “Chronotopies romanesques: Germinal.” Poétique, 81: 89-104.
MORSON, G. (2010). “The Chronotope of Humanness: Bakhtin and Dostoevsky.” In Bemong, N., Borghart, P., de Dobbeleer, M., Demoen, K., de Temmerman, K. and Keunen, B. (eds.), Bakhtin’s Theory of the Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent, Academia Press, 93-110.
PECHEY, G. (1998). “Modernity and Chronotopicity in Bakhtin.” In Shepherd, D. (ed.), In The Contexts of Bakhtin: Philosophy, Authorship, Aesthetics. London and New York, Routledge, 173-82.
PUSHKIN, M. (2017). “Critical Analysis of Bakhtin’s Chronotope.” Humanitas, 5(10): 435-447. https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.356222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.356222
RITELLA, G., RAJALA, A. and RENSHAW, P. (2021). “Using chronotope to research the space-time relations of learning and education: Dimensions of the unit of analysis.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100381
SCHOLZ, B. (1998). “Bakhtin’s Concept of ‘Chronotope’: The Kantian Connection.” In Shepherd, D. (ed.), The Contexts of Bakhtin: Philosophy, Authorship, Aesthetics. London and New York, Routledge, 141-172.
SCHULTZ, M., MAGUIRE, S., LANGLEY, A. and TSOUKAS, H. (eds.) (2012). Constructing Identity in and around Organizations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213493891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640997.001.0001
SPODE, H. (2010). “Time, space, and tourism.” In Eberhard, W. and Lübke, C. (eds.), The Plurality of Europe. Identities and Spaces. Leipzig, Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 233-246.
STEINBY, L. (2013). “Bakhtin’s Concept of the Chronotope: the Viewpoint of an Acting Subject.” In Steinby, L. and Tintti, T. (eds.), Bakhtin and his Others. (Inter)subjectivity, Chronotope, Dialogism. London, Anthem Press, 105-125. https://doi.org/10.7135/9780857283108.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/9780857283108.009
TODOROV, T. (1973). The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. New York, Cornell University Press.
ZORAN, G. (1984). “Towards a Theory of Space in Narrative.” Poetics Today, 5(2): 309-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1771935
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hans Färnlöf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize CIF the first publication. They are free to share and redistribute the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
It is recommended to include the DOI number.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License





