Frame Modelling of the Engineering Terminology System (Based on Languages of Various Structures)

Gulshat Beysembaeva; Madina Kengessova; Malika Aimagambetova; Mainura Buribayeva; Zhanar Malikova

doi:10.18172/cif.6868

Authors

Gulshat Beysembaeva L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-6470
Madina Kengessova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Malika Aimagambetova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Mainura Buribayeva Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University
Zhanar Malikova Astana IT University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.6868

Keywords:

Slots, conceptual levels, periphery, quantitative indicators, field of knowledge

Abstract

The study aims to unify the terminological elements of the sublanguage of electrical engineering by applying frame analysis on the examples of German, French, Kazakh and Russian. The study examines the process of emergence and consolidation of terminological phrases in the compared languages by applying frame analysis based on the sublanguage of electrical engineering. The analysis revealed that the frame models were structured using a core with frames and subframes and a periphery with slots and sub-slots. When comparing the number of elements of frame models, the study concluded that the number of frames and subframes in the languages under consideration was the same, while at the conceptual levels of slots and sub-slots, the indicators differed. This work can be used for further study of frame semantics, cognitive and frame modelling in national languages, and comparative linguistic research based on the analysis of the terminographic field of electrical engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AL-KHAWALDEH, N.N., OLIMAT, S.N., MAHADIN, D.K., MASHAQBA, B.M. and HUNEETY, A.I.A. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 and its terminology learning strategies on EFL learners’ vocabulary repertoire. Ampersand, 10, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119

AMSPOKER, E. and PETRUCK, M.R.L. (2022). A gamified approach to frame semantic role labeling. En Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Data Science with Human-in-the-Loop, pp. 37-42. Abu Dhabi: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.dash-1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.dash-1.6

BAITILEUOVA, G.A., YESHIMOV, M.P. and DUISENBAYEVA, R.I. (2023). To enrich vocabulary using frames. Bulletin of the Eurasian Humanities Institute, 1, pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2023-1.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2023-1.02

BAKER, C.F. and LORENZI, A. (2020). Exploring crosslinguistic FrameNet alignment. En Proceedings of the International FrameNet Workshop 2020: Towards a Global, Multilingual FrameNet, pp. 77-84. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.11

CIROKU, F., DE GIORGIS, S., GANGEMI, A., MARTINEZ-PANDIANI, D.S. and PRESUTTI, V. (2024). Automated multimodal sensemaking: Ontology-based integration of linguistic frames and visual data. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107997

EFREMOV, A. (2025a). The Fear Primacy Hypothesis in the Structure of Emotional States: A Systematic Literature Review. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241313106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241313106

EFREMOV, A. (2025b). The Psychology of Faith and Religious Identity: How Theology Shapes Worldview and Self-Perception. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020

GUO, S., GUAN, Y., LI, R., LI, X. and TAN, H. (2021). Frame-based multi-level semantics representation for text matching. Knowledge-Based Systems, 232, 107454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107454

HERWEG, M. (2021). Dynamic event types in frame semantics: The representation of change in FAMEu. Heidelberg University Papers on Language and Cognition, 2(1), pp. 15-44. https://doi.org/10.11588/huplc.2021.1.82301

HU, P., YE, Q., ZHANG, W., LIU, J. and RUAN, T. (2023). Integration of multiple terminology bases: A multi-view alignment method using the hierarchical structure. Bioinformatics, 39(11), btad689. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad689

IVANOVA, I. and MARTYNIUK, I. (2024). Characteristics of the thinking style of student youth. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(4), pp. 61-77. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.61

KASSYM, B.K. and SAMENOVA, S.N. (2023). Frame structure of mental vocabulary of the Kazakh language. Bulletin of the Karaganda University, 109(1), pp. 46-53. https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ph1/46-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ph1/46-53

KEMIAC, L. (2024). On Human Sciences: Dialogues Between Ernst Cassirer and Mikhail Bakhtin. Bakhtiniana, 19(4), e65025e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e65025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e65025

KOEVA, S. and DOYCHEV, E. (2022). Ontology supported frame classification. En Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria, pp. 203-213. Sofia: Institute for Bulgarian Language. https://aclanthology.org/2022.clib-1.23

KULYK, O.D. (2023). Training future translators in the age of artificial intelligence. Scientia et Societus, 2(1), pp. 48-56. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/48-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/48-56

L’HOMME, M.C. (2021). Revisiting polysemy in terminology. En Proceedings of the XIX EURALEX “Lexicography for Inclusion”, pp. 415-424. Alexandroupolis: Democritus University of Thrace. https://euralex.org/wp-content/themes/euralex/proceedings/Euralex2020-2021/EURALEX2020-2021_Vol1-p415-424.pdf

L’HOMME, M.C. and ROBICHAUD, B. (2014). Frames and terminology: Representing predicative terms in the field of the environment. En Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon, pp. 186-197. Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics; Dublin City University. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4723

LAI, S., JIANG, Y., GUO, L., BETKE, M., ISHWAR, P. and WIJAYA, D.T. (2022). An unsupervised approach to discover media frames. En Proceedings of the LREC 2022 Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Political Sciences, pp. 22-31. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2022.politicalnlp-1.4

LEÓN-ARAÚZ, P., REIMERINK, A. and CABEZAS-GARCÍA, M. (2020). Representing multiword term variation in a terminological knowledge base: A corpus-based study. En Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 2358-2367. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.287

LIÉGEOIS, V. and MATHYSEN, J. (2022). Frames featuring in epidemiological crisis communication. A frame-semantic analysis of pandemic crisis communication in multilingual Belgium. Lingue e Linguaggi, 47, pp. 297-329. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v47p297

LIU, Y. (2021). Research on the motivation typology of linguistic terminology. China Terminology, 23(1), pp. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2021.01.003

LÖBNER, S. (2021). Frames at the interface of language and cognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7, pp. 261-284. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-042920-030620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-042920-030620

MA, H., SHEN, L., SUN, H., XU, Z., HOU, L., WU, S., FANG, A., LI, J. and QIAN, Q. (2021). COVID term: A bilingual terminology for COVID-19. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01593-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01593-9

MADSEN, B.N. and THOMSEN, H.E. (2009). Terminological concept modelling and conceptual data modelling. International Journal of Metadata Semantics and Ontologies, 4(4), pp. 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029228

MASSION, F. (2021). Terminology in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Translation Studies, 1(1), pp. 87-108. https://doi.org/10.3726/JTS012021.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/JTS012021.6

MOLINA SALINAS, C., RUIZ CABALLERO, A. and HERNÁNDEZ PECH, S. (2020). A terminographic definition model for a glossary of Mexican virreinal liturgical documents. Texts in Process, 6(1), pp. 96-117. https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2020.6.1.6molinaruizhernandez DOI: https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2020.6.1.6molinaruizhernandez

NURGALIYEVA, S., ZHUMABAYEVA, A., KULGILDINOVA, T., ABILDINA, S., KURBONOVA, B., UMIRBEKOVA, A. and BOLATOV, A. (2025). Evaluating student satisfaction of terminological apparatus with natural and mathematical textbooks in Kazakhstani schools. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2468563. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2468563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2468563

OLIVEIRA, É.M.D. (2024). The Sociolinguistic Interview Genre and Its Chronotopic Dimensions. Bakhtiniana, 19(4), e64132e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e64132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e64132

REFSGAARD, J.C. and HENRIKSEN, H.J. (2004). Modelling guidelines – Terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27(1), pp. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006

ROZHKOV, Yu. (2022). Terminology studies: Linguocognitive paradigm. International Journal of Philology, 26(1), pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.01.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.01.024

SAEED, N. and NAVEED, H. (2022). Medical terminology-based computing system: A lightweight post-processing solution for out-of-vocabulary multi-word terms. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9, 928530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.928530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.928530

SAN MARTIN, A. (2022). Contextual constraints in terminological definitions. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 885283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.885283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.885283

SHERSHOVA, T. and CHAIKA, V. (2024). Cultural memory and memory culture. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(1), pp. 188-195. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195

SHYNKARUK, V. (2023). Revisiting syntax of coherent speech. International Journal of Philology, 27(2), pp. 6-12. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01

SPASKA, A., KOZUB, H., ABYLASYNOVA, G., KOZUB, V. and KOVAL, Y. (2025). Evaluation of innovative teaching methods using modern information technologies. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(1), pp. 422-440. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.38107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.38107

TAT, D. (2022). Lexical borrowing targets spans. Languages, 7(4), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040289

TORRENT, T.T., MATOS, E.E.S., BELCAVELLO, F., VIRIDIANO, M., GAMONAL, M.A., COSTA, A.D. and MARIM, M.C. (2022). Representing context in FrameNet: A multidimensional, multimodal approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 838441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838441

VEZZANI, F. and DI NUNZIO, G.M. (2023). Multilingual digital terminology: Introduction to the special issue. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(Suppl. 1), pp. i1-i5. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad028

WILLICH, A. (2022). Introducing construction semantics (CxS): A frame-semantic extension of construction grammar and constructicography. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(1), pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0082

ZHENG, C., CHEN, X., XU, R. and CHANG, B. (2022). A double-graph based framework for frame semantic parsing. En Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 4998-5011. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.368

ZHENG, J. (2020). The model construction of knowledge organization system in terminography – Taking Chinese linguistic terminology as an example. En Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-Cultural Communication, pp. 154-163. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.323