Modélisation des structures du système terminologique de l'ingénierie (basée sur des langages de différentes structures)
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.6868Mots-clés :
Sillons, niveaux conceptuels, périphérie, indicateurs quantitatifs, champ de connaissancesRésumé
L'étude vise à unifier les éléments terminologiques du sous-langage de l'ingénierie électrique en appliquant l'analyse des cadres à des exemples en allemand, français, kazakh et russe. L'étude examine le processus d'émergence et de consolidation des expressions terminologiques dans les langues comparées en appliquant l'analyse des cadres basée sur le sous-langage de l'ingénierie électrique. L'analyse a révélé que les modèles de cadres étaient structurés à l'aide d'un noyau avec des cadres et des sous-cadres et d'une périphérie avec des emplacements et des sous-emplacements. En comparant le nombre d'éléments des modèles de cadres, l'étude a conclu que le nombre de cadres et de sous-cadres dans les langues considérées était le même, tandis qu'au niveau conceptuel des emplacements et des sous-emplacements, les indicateurs différaient. Ce travail peut être utilisé pour une étude plus approfondie de la sémantique des cadres, de la modélisation cognitive et des cadres dans les langues nationales, ainsi que pour la recherche linguistique comparative basée sur l'analyse du champ terminologique de l'ingénierie électrique.
Téléchargements
Références
AL-KHAWALDEH, N.N., OLIMAT, S.N., MAHADIN, D.K., MASHAQBA, B.M. and HUNEETY, A.I.A. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 and its terminology learning strategies on EFL learners’ vocabulary repertoire. Ampersand, 10, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100119
AMSPOKER, E. and PETRUCK, M.R.L. (2022). A gamified approach to frame semantic role labeling. En Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Data Science with Human-in-the-Loop, pp. 37-42. Abu Dhabi: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.dash-1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.dash-1.6
BAITILEUOVA, G.A., YESHIMOV, M.P. and DUISENBAYEVA, R.I. (2023). To enrich vocabulary using frames. Bulletin of the Eurasian Humanities Institute, 1, pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2023-1.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2023-1.02
BAKER, C.F. and LORENZI, A. (2020). Exploring crosslinguistic FrameNet alignment. En Proceedings of the International FrameNet Workshop 2020: Towards a Global, Multilingual FrameNet, pp. 77-84. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.11
CIROKU, F., DE GIORGIS, S., GANGEMI, A., MARTINEZ-PANDIANI, D.S. and PRESUTTI, V. (2024). Automated multimodal sensemaking: Ontology-based integration of linguistic frames and visual data. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107997
EFREMOV, A. (2025a). The Fear Primacy Hypothesis in the Structure of Emotional States: A Systematic Literature Review. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241313106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241313106
EFREMOV, A. (2025b). The Psychology of Faith and Religious Identity: How Theology Shapes Worldview and Self-Perception. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020
GUO, S., GUAN, Y., LI, R., LI, X. and TAN, H. (2021). Frame-based multi-level semantics representation for text matching. Knowledge-Based Systems, 232, 107454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107454
HERWEG, M. (2021). Dynamic event types in frame semantics: The representation of change in FAMEu. Heidelberg University Papers on Language and Cognition, 2(1), pp. 15-44. https://doi.org/10.11588/huplc.2021.1.82301
HU, P., YE, Q., ZHANG, W., LIU, J. and RUAN, T. (2023). Integration of multiple terminology bases: A multi-view alignment method using the hierarchical structure. Bioinformatics, 39(11), btad689. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad689
IVANOVA, I. and MARTYNIUK, I. (2024). Characteristics of the thinking style of student youth. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(4), pp. 61-77. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.61
KASSYM, B.K. and SAMENOVA, S.N. (2023). Frame structure of mental vocabulary of the Kazakh language. Bulletin of the Karaganda University, 109(1), pp. 46-53. https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ph1/46-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ph1/46-53
KEMIAC, L. (2024). On Human Sciences: Dialogues Between Ernst Cassirer and Mikhail Bakhtin. Bakhtiniana, 19(4), e65025e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e65025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e65025
KOEVA, S. and DOYCHEV, E. (2022). Ontology supported frame classification. En Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria, pp. 203-213. Sofia: Institute for Bulgarian Language. https://aclanthology.org/2022.clib-1.23
KULYK, O.D. (2023). Training future translators in the age of artificial intelligence. Scientia et Societus, 2(1), pp. 48-56. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/48-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/48-56
L’HOMME, M.C. (2021). Revisiting polysemy in terminology. En Proceedings of the XIX EURALEX “Lexicography for Inclusion”, pp. 415-424. Alexandroupolis: Democritus University of Thrace. https://euralex.org/wp-content/themes/euralex/proceedings/Euralex2020-2021/EURALEX2020-2021_Vol1-p415-424.pdf
L’HOMME, M.C. and ROBICHAUD, B. (2014). Frames and terminology: Representing predicative terms in the field of the environment. En Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon, pp. 186-197. Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics; Dublin City University. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4723
LAI, S., JIANG, Y., GUO, L., BETKE, M., ISHWAR, P. and WIJAYA, D.T. (2022). An unsupervised approach to discover media frames. En Proceedings of the LREC 2022 Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Political Sciences, pp. 22-31. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2022.politicalnlp-1.4
LEÓN-ARAÚZ, P., REIMERINK, A. and CABEZAS-GARCÍA, M. (2020). Representing multiword term variation in a terminological knowledge base: A corpus-based study. En Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 2358-2367. Marseille: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.287
LIÉGEOIS, V. and MATHYSEN, J. (2022). Frames featuring in epidemiological crisis communication. A frame-semantic analysis of pandemic crisis communication in multilingual Belgium. Lingue e Linguaggi, 47, pp. 297-329. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v47p297
LIU, Y. (2021). Research on the motivation typology of linguistic terminology. China Terminology, 23(1), pp. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8578.2021.01.003
LÖBNER, S. (2021). Frames at the interface of language and cognition. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7, pp. 261-284. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-042920-030620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-042920-030620
MA, H., SHEN, L., SUN, H., XU, Z., HOU, L., WU, S., FANG, A., LI, J. and QIAN, Q. (2021). COVID term: A bilingual terminology for COVID-19. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01593-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01593-9
MADSEN, B.N. and THOMSEN, H.E. (2009). Terminological concept modelling and conceptual data modelling. International Journal of Metadata Semantics and Ontologies, 4(4), pp. 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029228
MASSION, F. (2021). Terminology in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Translation Studies, 1(1), pp. 87-108. https://doi.org/10.3726/JTS012021.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/JTS012021.6
MOLINA SALINAS, C., RUIZ CABALLERO, A. and HERNÁNDEZ PECH, S. (2020). A terminographic definition model for a glossary of Mexican virreinal liturgical documents. Texts in Process, 6(1), pp. 96-117. https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2020.6.1.6molinaruizhernandez DOI: https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2020.6.1.6molinaruizhernandez
NURGALIYEVA, S., ZHUMABAYEVA, A., KULGILDINOVA, T., ABILDINA, S., KURBONOVA, B., UMIRBEKOVA, A. and BOLATOV, A. (2025). Evaluating student satisfaction of terminological apparatus with natural and mathematical textbooks in Kazakhstani schools. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2468563. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2468563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2468563
OLIVEIRA, É.M.D. (2024). The Sociolinguistic Interview Genre and Its Chronotopic Dimensions. Bakhtiniana, 19(4), e64132e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e64132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e64132
REFSGAARD, J.C. and HENRIKSEN, H.J. (2004). Modelling guidelines – Terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27(1), pp. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006
ROZHKOV, Yu. (2022). Terminology studies: Linguocognitive paradigm. International Journal of Philology, 26(1), pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.01.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.01.024
SAEED, N. and NAVEED, H. (2022). Medical terminology-based computing system: A lightweight post-processing solution for out-of-vocabulary multi-word terms. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9, 928530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.928530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.928530
SAN MARTIN, A. (2022). Contextual constraints in terminological definitions. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 885283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.885283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.885283
SHERSHOVA, T. and CHAIKA, V. (2024). Cultural memory and memory culture. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(1), pp. 188-195. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195
SHYNKARUK, V. (2023). Revisiting syntax of coherent speech. International Journal of Philology, 27(2), pp. 6-12. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01
SPASKA, A., KOZUB, H., ABYLASYNOVA, G., KOZUB, V. and KOVAL, Y. (2025). Evaluation of innovative teaching methods using modern information technologies. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(1), pp. 422-440. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.38107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.38107
TAT, D. (2022). Lexical borrowing targets spans. Languages, 7(4), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040289
TORRENT, T.T., MATOS, E.E.S., BELCAVELLO, F., VIRIDIANO, M., GAMONAL, M.A., COSTA, A.D. and MARIM, M.C. (2022). Representing context in FrameNet: A multidimensional, multimodal approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 838441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838441
VEZZANI, F. and DI NUNZIO, G.M. (2023). Multilingual digital terminology: Introduction to the special issue. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(Suppl. 1), pp. i1-i5. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad028
WILLICH, A. (2022). Introducing construction semantics (CxS): A frame-semantic extension of construction grammar and constructicography. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(1), pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0082
ZHENG, C., CHEN, X., XU, R. and CHANG, B. (2022). A double-graph based framework for frame semantic parsing. En Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 4998-5011. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.368
ZHENG, J. (2020). The model construction of knowledge organization system in terminography – Taking Chinese linguistic terminology as an example. En Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-Cultural Communication, pp. 154-163. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.323
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Gulshat Beysembaeva, Madina Kengessova , Malika Aimagambetova , Mainura Buribayeva , Zhanar Malikova 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Les articles appartiennent à leurs auteurs respectifs qui accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l’autorisation de la revue n’étant pas nécessaire pour leur diffusion une fois publiés. Une fois la version de l’éditeur publiée, l’auteur est tenu de s’y référer dans les versions archivées dans les dépôts personnels ou institutionnels.
Il est conseillé aux auteurs/s d’archiver la version de l’éditeur dans des dépôts institutionnels.
La revue permettant à d'autres de réutiliser les ouvrages selon les conditions de la licence CC Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
