L’usage de la métaphore pour explorer les modèles d’organisation des textes expositifs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.3635Mots-clés :
structure textuelle, métaphore conceptuelle, écriture académique, textes expositifs, EFLRésumé
L'écriture est une tâche complexe et multiforme qui présente de nombreux défis, en particulier lorsque vous écrivez dans une langue étrangère. Des études récentes ont montré que les auteurs et les lecteurs tirent un grand profit de la connaissance explicite des genres textuels et de leur organisation, le sens de l’unité d’un texte étant largement lié à sa structure générale. La connaissance de la structure du texte révèle les conventions qui contrôlent le flux d'information et déterminent les types de signaux disponibles pour les lecteurs. Dans cet article, nous utilisons la théorie de la métaphore conceptuelle pour proposer un nouveau moyen d’explorer l’écriture dans un contexte universitaire et exploiter le cadre conceptuel utilisé par les auteurs et les lecteurs pour organiser l’information. Dans ce sens, nous illustrons comment la métaphore les TEXTES SONT DES VOYAGES peut être utilisée pour élucider l'organisation macrostructurale sous-jacente dans des textes expositifs écrits par des apprenants de la langue anglaise.
Téléchargements
Références
ALLBRITTON, D. W. (1995). “When metaphors function as schemas: Some cognitive effects of conceptual metaphors”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 33-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_4
ALLBRITTON, D. W., MCKOON, G. and GERRIG, R. J. (1995). “Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (3): 612-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.3.612
CASTAÑO, E. (2012). The Embodied Basis of Discourse Coherence. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
CASTAÑO, E., HILFERTY, J., and VERDAGUER, I. (2013). “The Metaphorical Basis of Discourse Structure” in Biomedical English: A Corpus-based Approach. (Eds. I. Verdaguer, N. Laso and D. Salazar). Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins: 165-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.56.09cas
DICKSON, S. V., SIMMONS, D. and KAMEENUI, E. J. (1995). “Instruction in expository text: A focus on compare/contrast structure”. LD Forum 20: 8-15.
ELBOW, P. (2006). “The music of form: rethinking organization in writing”. College Composition and Communication 57 (4): 620-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20065062
EUBANKS, P. E. (2011). Metaphor and writing: figurative thought in the discourse of written communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761041
FLORIS, F. D. and DIVINA, M. (2009). “A study on the reading skills of EFL university students”. TEFLIN Journal 20 (1): 37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i1/37-47
FLOWER, L. and HAYES, J. (1981). “A cognitive process theory of writing”. College Composition and Communication 32: 365-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
GARNHAM, A. and OAKHILL, J. V. (1996). “The mental models theory of language comprehension” in Models of Understanding Text. (Eds. B. K. Britton and A. C. Graesser). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 313-339.
GENTNER, D. and GENTNER, D. R. (1983). “Flowing waters and teeming crowds: mental models of electricity” in Mental Models. (Eds. D. Gentner, and A. L. Stevens). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 99-129.
GHAITH, G. M. and HARKOUSS, S. (2003). “Role of Text Structure Awareness in the Recall of Expository Discourse”. Foreign Language Annals 36 (1): 86-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01935.x
GOATLY, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000
GOLDMAN, S. R. and RAKESTRAW, J. A. (2000). “Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning from Text” in Handbook of Reading Research. (Eds. M. L. Kamil et al.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum: 311-336.
HAMPE, B. (Ed.) (2017). Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324
HURTIENNE, J. and BLESSING, L. (2007). “Design for Intuitive Use - Testing image schema theory for user interface design”. 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Proceedings of the conference 386: 1-12.
HYLAND, K. (2007). “Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction”. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (3): 148-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
JOHNSON, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
KIBBLE, R. and POWER, R. (2004). “Optimizing Referential Coherence in Text Generation”. Computational Linguistics 30 (4): 401-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0891201042544893
KIMMEL, M. (2005). “From Metaphor to the ‘Mental Sketchpad’: Literary Macrostructure and Compound Image Schemas in Heart of Darkness”. Metaphor and Symbol 20 (3): 199-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2003_3
KIMMEL, M. (2008). “Image schemas in narrative macrostructure: combining cognitive linguistic with psycholinguistic approaches” in New Beginnings in Literary Studies. (Eds. W. Van Peer and J. Auracher). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars: 158-184.
KIMMEL, M. (2013). “The conceptual metaphors of narrative structure: Gestural evidence for spatialized form in storytelling”. PJOS 5 (2): 75-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2013.5.9761
KINTSCH, W. and VIPOND, D. (2014). “Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory” in Perspectives on Learning and Memory (Ed. L. G. Nilsson). New York and London: Psychology Press: 329-365.
KUSIAK-PISOWACKA, M. (2016). “Mental Model Theories in reading research and Instruction” in Working in Text and Around Text in Foreign Language Environments. (Eds. H. Chodkiewicz et al.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing: 25-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33272-7_2
LAKOFF, G. and JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
LAKOFF, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
LAKOFF, G. (1993). “The contemporary theory of metaphor” in Metaphor and Thought. (Ed. A. Ortony). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 202-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
LAKOFF, G. (2014). “Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
LAU, R. R. and SCHLESINGER, M. (2005). “Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies”. Political Psychology 26: 77-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00410.x
MANDLER, M. J. (1986). “On the comprehension of temporal order”. Language and Cognitive Processes 1: 309-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968608404680
MATSUDA, P. K., CANAGARAJAH, A. S., HARKLAU, L., HYLAND, K. and WARSCHAUER, M. (2003). “Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium”. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2): 151-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00016-X
MEYER, B. J. F. (1999). “The importance of text structure in everyday reading” in Understanding language understanding: Computational models of reading and understanding. (Eds. A. Ram, and K. Moorman). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 227-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6981.003.0010
MEYER, B. J. F., TALBOT, A. P., POON, L. W. and JOHNSON, M. M. (2001). “Effects of structure strategy instruction on text recall of older African American Adults” in Literacy in African Americans communities. (Eds. J. L. Harris et al.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum: 233-263.
MEYER, B. J. F., YOUNG, C. J. and BARTLETT, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. New York and London: Psychology Press.
MEYER, B. J. F. and POON, L.W. (2004). “Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text” in Theoretical models and processes of reading. (Eds. R. B. Ruddell, and N. J. Unrau). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association: 810-851.
MILLIS, K. and GRAESSER, A. C. (1994). “The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts”. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 583-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1028
MULDER, G. (2008). Understanding causal coherence relations. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
MURRAY, J. D. (1997). “Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity”. Memory and Cognition 25: 227-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201114
PEARSON, P. and RAPHAEL, T. (1990). “Reading comprehension as a dimension of thinking” in Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform. (Eds. B. F. Jones, and L. I. Idol). Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence: 209-240.
PEÑA CERVEL, M. S. (2011). “Macbeth Revisited: A cognitive analysis”. Metaphor and Symbol 26: 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.535412
PONTEROTTO, D. (2003). “The cohesive role of cognitive metaphor in discourse and conversation” in Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. (Ed. A. Barcelona). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 283-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.283
PONTEROTTO, D. (2007). “Conceptual Metaphor and Text Development: a Narratological Perspective”. Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume I 5: 59-73.
RAPHAEL, T. E. and ENGLERT, C. S. (1990). “Writing and reading: Partners in constructing meaning”. The Reading Teacher 43: 388-400.
RICHARDSON, J. and MORGAN, R. (2003). Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
ROBINS, S. and MAYER, R. E. (2000). “The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas”. Discourse Processes 30: 57-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp3001_03
SALMANI-NODOUSHAN, M. A. (2010). “The impact of formal schemata on L3 reading recall”. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS) 4 (4): 357-372.
SANDERS, T. J. M. and SCHILPEROORD, J. (2006). “Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing; How text analysis provides insights in writing products and writing processes” in Handbook of Writing Research. (Eds. C. MacArthur; S. Graham, and J. Fitzgerald). New York: Guilford Press: 386-402.
SANDERS, T., SPOOREN, W. and NOORDMAN, L. (1993). “Coherence Relations in a Cognitive Theory of Discourse Representation”. Cognitive Linguistics 4 (2): 93-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.2.93
SANDERS, T. and NOORDMAN, L. G. M. (2000). “The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing”. Discourse Processes 29: 37-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3
SCHOONEN, R., SNELLINGS, P., STEVENSON, M. and VAN GELDEREN, A. (2009). “Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing” in Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research. (Ed. R. M. Manchón). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters: 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691859-007
SEMINO, ELENA. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
SERIG, D. (2008). “Understanding the conceptual landscape of visual metaphor”. Teaching Artist Journal 6 (1): 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15411790701678408
SINGER, M. and GAGNON, N. (1999). “Detecting causal inconsistencies in scientific text” in Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. (Eds. S. R. Goldman, A. Graesser, and P. van den Broek). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: 179-194.
TALMY, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. I. Cambridge: The Mitt Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
THIBODEAU, P. H. and BORODITSKY, L. (2011). “Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning”. PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
THIBODEAU, P. H. and BORODITSKY, L. (2013). “Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning”. PLoS ONE 8 (1): e52961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
TOBIN, L. (1989). “Bridging Gaps: Analyzing Our Students’ Metaphors for Composing”. College Composition and Communication 40 (4): 444-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198911113
TOMLINSON, B. (2005). Authors on writing: Metaphors and intellectual labor. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595668
TRABASSO, T., SECCO, T. and VAN DEN BROEK, P. W. (1984). “Causal cohesion and story coherence” in Learning and comprehension of text. (Eds. H. Mandler, N. L. Stein, and T. Trabasso). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum: 83-111.
VAHIDI, S. (2008). “The impact of EFL learners’ rhetorical organization awareness on English academic/expository text comprehension”. Pazhuhesh– e Zabanha–ye Khareji 41: 145-158.
VIRTUE, S., VAN DEN BROEK, P. and LINDERHOLM, T. (2006). “Hemispheric processing of inferences: The effects of textual constraint and working-memory capacity”. Memory and Cognition 34 (6): 1341-1354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193276
WONG, B.Y.L. (2000). “Writing strategies instruction for expository essays for adolescents with and without disabilities”. Topics in Language Disorders 20: 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020040-00005
YOUNG, T. A. and HADAWAY, N. L. (Eds.) (2006). Supporting the literacy development of English learners: Increasing success in all classrooms. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
ZWAAN, R. and RADVANSKY, G. (1998). “Situation models in language comprehension and memory”. Psychological Bulletin 123 (2): 162-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.162
ZWAAN, R. A. and SINGER, M. (2003). “Text comprehension” in Handbook of discourse processes. (Eds. A.C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher and S. R. Goldman). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum: 83-121.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les articles appartiennent à leurs auteurs respectifs qui accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l’autorisation de la revue n’étant pas nécessaire pour leur diffusion une fois publiés. Une fois la version de l’éditeur publiée, l’auteur est tenu de s’y référer dans les versions archivées dans les dépôts personnels ou institutionnels.
Il est conseillé aux auteurs/s d’archiver la version de l’éditeur dans des dépôts institutionnels.
La revue permettant à d'autres de réutiliser les ouvrages selon les conditions de la licence CC Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
