Impacto de la multimodalidad en la comprensión lectora de textos narrativos  en inglés como lengua extranjera (L2) en estudiantes universitarios

Fernando Vera Millalén

doi:10.18172/con.2608

Authors

Fernando Vera Millalén Universidad de Aconcagua (Chile)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/con.2608

Keywords:

Foreign language learning, multimodality, narrative texts, reading comprehension.

Abstract

This research seeks to compare the effect that monomodal and multimodal tests have on the reading comprehension level of English-written narrative texts that EFL learners achieve at a private Chilean university. For this purpose, a quasi-experiment was performed, using a monomodal reading comprehension test and another multimodal one, with intact groups. The experimental group took the multimodal format test, while the control group took the monomodal format test. The interest of this research focused on the need to integrate multimodal texts in L2 reading comprehension. The results endorse the hypothesis that students reach higher comprehension levels in multimodal reading comprehension tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fernando Vera Millalén, Universidad de Aconcagua (Chile)

Doctor en Educación, Director Sello Institucional, Vicerrectoría Académica, Universidad de Aconcagua

References

ALBERS, P. (2007). Visual discourse analysis: An introduction to the analysis of school-generated visual texts. En D. W. Rowe, R. T. Jiménez, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, Y. Kim, K. M. Leander, y V. J. Risko (Eds.), 56th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 81-95).

AUSUBEL, D., NOVAK, J. y HANESIAN, H. (2005). Psicología educativa. Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. México, D.F.: Trillas.

BARNETT, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading. NJ: Pretince Hall.

BERNHARDT, E. B. (1983). Testing foreign language reading comprehension. The immediate recall protocol. Die Unterrichichtspraxis, 16, 27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3530598

BERNHARDT, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second-language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

CARREL, P. L. y CARSON, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00031-2

CHUN, D. y PLASS, J. (1996). Facilitating Reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), pp. 503-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3

GEE, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. (Rev. ed.). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.

HAMPEL, R. (2002). Network-based language teaching today: Multimodality, multi-dimensionality and interaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE’02). The Open University, UK. Disponible en: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/icce/2002/1509/00/15090639.pdf.

HOSENFELD, C. (1979). A learning-teaching view of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 12, 51-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1979.tb00949.x

JEWITT, C. y KRESS, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Nueva York: Peter Lang.

KODA, K. (1994). Second language reading research: problems and possibilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400006950

KRESS, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Cambridge: The Cromwell Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234

KRESS, G. y VAN LEEUWEN, T. (2001.) Multimodal Discourse. Londres: Arnold.

LAUFER, B. (1986). Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 69-75.

MATTHEWMAN, S., BLIGHT, A. y DAVIES, C. (2004). What does multimodality mean for English? Creative tensions in teaching new texts and new literacies. Education, Communication and Information, 4(1). Disponible en: http://www.interactiveeducation.ac.uk/out_mat.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631042000210944

MAYER, R. y SIMS, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of dual coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.86.3.389

PALINCSAR, A. S. y BROWN, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

RODRÍGUEZ, W., OCHOA, S. y PARKER, R. (2006). The crosslinguistic role of cognitive academic language proficiency on reading growth in Spanish and English. Bilingual Research Journal, 30. Disponible en: http://brj.asu.edu/vol30_no1/art5.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2006.10162867

SCHOONEN, R., HULSTIJN, J. y BOSSERS, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48, 71-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00033

SERAFINI, F. (2011). Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54, 342-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.5.4

SERAFINI, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multimodal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347

SUSSER, B. y ROBB, TH. (1990). EFL extensive reading instruction: Research and procedure. JALT Journal, 12(2). Disponible en: http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/~trobb/sussrobb.html.

WIDDOWSON, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

WILLOWS, D. M. y HOUGHTON, H. A. (1987). The Psychology of illustration. Nueva York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4674-9