La evaluación de las actividades musicales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18172/con.500Abstract
After establishing and reflecting on some of the conditions which complicate evaluation tasks in general and musical evaluation in particular, the writer of this article revises some of the established models and finally suggests various criteria which facilitate the evaluation of musical activities.Downloads
References
ASMUS, E. P. (1999). Music assessment concepts. Music educators journal, 86.
BRASHER. E. et al. (1999). Managing assessment in music education. Teaching music, 7.
CARLIN, J. (1996). Videotape as an assessment tool. Teaching music, 3.
COLL, C. (1994). El compromiso con la Reforma. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 91.
COLLINS, I. H. (1998). Assessment and evaluation in music teacher education. Arts education policy review, 98.
COLWELL, R. (1998). Preparing student teachers in assessment. Arts education policy review, 99.
COLWELL, R. (1999). The 1997 assessment in music: red flags in the sunset. Arts education policy review, 100.
COOKE, D. (1959). The languages of music. London: OUP.
COPE, C. O. (1996). Steps towards effective assessment. Music educators journal, 83.
Decreto 20/1992 de 17 de febrero de la Comunidad Valenciana. DOGV.
GOOLSBY, T. W. (1995). Portfolio assessment for better evaluation. Music educators journal, 82.
GOOLSBY, T. W. (1999). Assessment in instrumental music. Music educators journal. Vol. 86.
HICKEY, M. (1996). Consensual Assessment of Children’s Musical Compositions. (Research project presentation, New York State School Music Association Convention). New York.
HICKEY, M. (1999). Assessment rubrics for music compositions. Music educators journal, 85.
JOHNSTONE, A. (1995). Tecniques of Composition in the British and Irish University Curriculum. British Journal of Music Education, 12.
LANGER, S. (1953). Feeling and form. Routledge: London.
LOGSE. (1990).
MENC (Music educators national conference). (1995). Teaching music, 2.
MEYER, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
NATIONAL CURRICULUM for England and Wales. (1991).
NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ARTS EDUCATION. (1994).
(NAEP) NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS. (1999). Department of Education. USA.
PÉREZ JUSTE, R. (1995). Evaluación de programas educativos. En Medina Rivilla, A. y Villar Angulo, L. M. (Coods.). Evaluación de programas educativos, centros y profesores. Universitas: Madrid.
REIMER, B. (1970). A philosophy of music education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
ROBINSON, M. (1995). Alternative assessment tecniques for teachers. Music educators journal, 83.
STAUFFER, S. L. (1999). Beginning assessment in elementary general music. Music educators journal, 86.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. y SHANKFIELD, A. J. (1987). Evaluación sistemática. Guía teórica y práctica. Paidós-MEC. Barcelona.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. (1988). Normas para evaluaciones. En Pascual, R. (Coord.). La gestión educativa ante la innovación y el cambio. Narcea. Madrid.
SWANWICK, K. (1979). A basis for Music Education. Windsor: Nfer-Nelson.
SWANWICK, K. (1997). Assessing musical quality in the National Curriculum. British journal of music education, 14:3, 205-215.
(TGAT) TASK GROUP ON ASSESSMENT AND TESTING. (1990). Department of Education. England.
YOUNG, J. O. (1997). Relativism and the evaluation of art. Journal of aesthetic education, 31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles and authorize Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación the first publication. They are free to share and redistribute the article without obtaining permission from the publisher as long as they give appropriate credit to the editor and the journal.
Self-archiving is allowed too. In fact, it is recommendable to deposit a PDF version of the paper in academic and/or institutional repositories.
