Longitudinal study on anti-bullying interventions on primary school students in a rural school

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/con.5075

Keywords:

Bullying, anti-bullying, students, school, Elementary

Abstract

There is a dearth of literature examining the impact of antibullying interventions in rural primary school children. However, it has been documented that early intervention and family education is of great impact when fighting bullying. Therefore, during this three-year study, the effects of interventions on bullying rates in elementary school children were examined in a rural elementary school in the state of Florida in U.S. The interventions analyzed included group-based psychoeducation, talk therapy, action with consequences, and parental involvement.

Only 55 of the 1,712 students, (3.2%) of the sample, turned out to be bullies. There were 226 alleged bullying events reported, and of these, only 46 met the bullying criteria established by the school board. After applying the intervention techniques rigorously and with fidelity, false reports decreased by 96%, and actual bullying events decreased by 83%.

The results indicated that anti-bullying interventions can reduce or eliminate bullying in elementary school students. The most successful intervention observed in this study was the combination of group discussions with action/ consequences and parental involvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Laraine Moscoso, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI)

Mi nombre es Laraine Moscoso, mi lengua materna es el español. Tengo 23 años de experiencia como educadora en Estados Unidos; mis estudios incluyen una licenciatura en idiomas extranjeros en español, una certificación como maestra de inglés para estudiantes de otros idiomas, una maestría en educación y también soy traductora certificada. Actualmente estoy terminando mis estudios para obtener un doctorado en educación de la Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI). Mi filosofía como educadora profesional es que nunca terminamos de aprender, el crecimiento intelectual es continuo por lo tanto la mejor manera de aprender es enseñando.

References

Ahtola, A., Haataja, A., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E. y Salmivalli, C. (2012). For children only? Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.006

Caputi, T. L. y Thomas McLellan, A. (2017). Truth and DARE: Is DARE’s new Keepin’it REAL curriculum suitable for American nationwide implementation? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 24(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2016.1208731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2016.1208731

Flynn, K., McDonald, C. C., D’Alonzo, B. A., Tam, V. y Wiebe, D. J. (2018). Violence in rural, suburban, and urban schools in Pennsylvania. The Journal of School Nursing, 34(4), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840518765086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840518765086

Huang, Y., Espelage, D. L., Polanin, J. R. y Hong, J. S. (2019). A meta-analytic review of school-based anti-bullying programs with a parent component. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0002-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0002-1

Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs. (2020). KiVa antibullying program. https://youth.gov/content/kiva-antibullying-program

Irwin, V., Wang, K., Cui, J., Zhang, J. y Thompson, A. (2021). Report on Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2020. U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/iscs20.pdf

Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A. y Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x

Limber, S. P., Olweus, D., Wang, W., Masiello, M. y Breivik, K. (2018). Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A large scale study of US students in grades 3-11. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004

Marshall, C. A., Kendall, E., Banks, M. E., Gover, R. M. y Bornemann, T. (2009). Disabilities: Insights from across fields and around the world. CT: Praeger. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-11004-000

Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos (2017). Annual estimates of the resident population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. En Aggressive Behavior (pp. 97-130). Boston: Springer. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435211/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5

Olweus, D. y Limber, S. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x

Piñero Ruiz, E., Gonzalo, J. J. A. y Ramírez, F. C. (2013). Contexto familiar y conductas de agresión y victimización entre escolares de educación secundaria. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 65(3), 109-129. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4396566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13042/23167

Rodkin, P. C., Espelage, D. L. y Hanish, L. D. (2015). A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes. American Psychologist, 70(4), 311-321. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-a0038658.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038658

Tonono, M. (2017). Bullying in rural schools: A comparison between boys and girls. (Tesis doctoral). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188775016.pdf

Torio-López, S. T., Calvo, J. V. P. y Menéndez, M. D. C. R. (2008). Estilos educativos parentales: Revisión bibliográfica y reformulación teórica. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 20, 151-178. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e909/f582d35753fe9aff4437c66fbc20a02e2d65.pdf

Van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C. y Veenstra, R. (2016). The support group approach in the Dutch KiVa anti-bullying programme: effects on victimisation, defending and well-being at school. Educational Research, 58(3), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949

West, S. L. y O’Neal, K. K. (2004). Project DARE outcome effectiveness revisited. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1027-1029. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.6.1027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.6.1027

Yang, F. y Zhang, L. (2018). Problem behavior patterns of victims of school bullying in rural China: The role of intrapersonal and interpersonal resources. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.007

Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., Kemp, J., Diliberti, M. y Oudekerk, B. A. (2018). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2017. NCES 2018-036/NCJ 251413. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED543705

Published

2022-09-20

How to Cite

Moscoso, L. (2022). Longitudinal study on anti-bullying interventions on primary school students in a rural school. Contextos Educativos. Revista De Educación, (30), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.5075