Acciones y actuaciones hacia una educación de calidad y sostenible: un estudio de caso entre el Grado de Educación Social y el de Ingeniería Industrial

Daniel Gutiérrez-Ujaque

doi:10.18172/con.5475

Authors

Daniel Gutiérrez-Ujaque Universidad de Lleida https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-7173

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/con.5475

Keywords:

Higher education, critical pedagogy, social education, industrial engineering, transdisciplinarity

Abstract

Critical Pedagogy (CP) opens the door to exploring novel methodological approaches in Higher Education (HE) by connecting social and cultural realities to training. This research presents a transdisciplinary university teaching proposal carried out among students of different degrees (Social Education and Industrial Engineering) at the University of Lleida (Spain). The research aims to describe methodological principles for implementing CP in HE across different degrees. It developed a case study following the participatory action research method. A total of 160 students participated: 78 with a bachelor’s degree in Social Education and 82 with a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Twenty-seven collaboration projects between students from both degrees emerged from this proposal. These were analysed using content analysis through a system of categories. The main results show the importance of generating cooperative and experiential learning between various grades of university students. We conclude with five methodological principles for implementing CP in HE between different studies. These principles enable us to understand university education as an enabling and transdisciplinary space that provides answers to real social problems in a thoughtful, critical, creative, and inclusive way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniel Gutiérrez-Ujaque, Universidad de Lleida

Departamento de Pedagogía

Doctor en Educación, Sociedad y Calidad de Vida

References

Ball, S. (2022). Dinero o ideas: la lucha por el sentido en la universidad neoliberal. Integración y Conocimiento, 2(11), 98-110.

Berchini, C. (2014). Learning to teach and critical pedagogy: Struggling with a “do as I say, not as I do” pedagogy. English Education, 46(3), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1145/237477.237546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/237477.237546

Clark, L. B. (2018). Critical pedagogy in the university: Can a lecture be critical pedagogy? Policy Futures Education, 16, 985-999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318787053

Cooper, C. (2013). Critical pedagogy in higher education. En C. Cooper y S. Gormally (Eds.), Socially Just, Radical Alternatives for Education and Youth Work Practice (pp. 39-64). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393593_3

Cho, S. (2010). Politics of Critical Pedagogy and New Social Movements. Educ. Philos. Theory, 42, 310-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00415.x

Daria, J. (2018). Community music on campus: Collaborative research, activist methods and critical pedagogy in a fandango-based participatory music programme. International Journal of Community Music, 11(1), 91-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/ijcm.11.1.91_1

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos en investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.

Giroux, H. (2018). La guerra del neoliberalismo contra la educación superior. Herder.

Gutiérrez-Ujaque, D. (2021). Aprendiendo a través del espacio urbano. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 37, 193-194.

Gutiérrez-Ujaque, D. y Jeyasingham, D. (2022). Towards a critical pedagogy of atmosphere in Social Work Education: Using Counter-Mapping to examine the emplaced Power relations of Practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 738-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab031

Herman, M. (2012). Reflective practice meets youth work supervision. Youth Policy, 109, 118-128.

Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., Zamojski, P. (2018). Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy. Punctum Books.

Ipar, E. (2018). Neoliberalismo y neoautoritarismo. Política y Sociedad, 55(3), 825-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/POSO.57514

Jasso Velazquez, D., Villagrán Rueda, S. y Rodríguez Ortiz, M. (2022). Práctica docente y ciudadanía en educación superior. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 12(24). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i24.1134

Kemmis, S. (2010). What is to be done? The place of action research. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524745

Molina, M. K. R., Castillo, P. M. M., Vanegas, W. J. y Gómez, R. J. M. (2021). Metodología de investigación acción participativa: Una estrategia para el fortalecimiento de la calidad educativa. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(3), 287-298.

Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P. y Lopez, G. E. (2003). Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 6(2), 165-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320308199

Nicolescu, B. (2011). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009

Nikolakaki, M., Giroux, H. y Freire, A. M. (2012). Critical Pedagogy in the New Dark Ages: Challenges and Possibilities. Peter Lang

Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917057

Praun, L., y Piza, S. (2021). Universidad, Docencia y Neoliberalismo. Socioscapes. International Journal of Societies, Politics and Cultures, 2(2), 245-272.

Real Decreto 822/2021 de 28 de septiembre de 2021, por el que se establece la organización de las enseñanzas universitarias y del procedimiento de aseguramiento de su calidad. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Madrid, 29 de septiembre de 2021, núm. 233, 119537-119578.

Rodríguez-Romero, M. (2020). Investigación educativa, neoliberalismo y crisis ecosocial. Del extractivismo a la reciprocidad profunda. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 18(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2020.18.2.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2020.18.2.007

Sanders, M. (2016). Review of The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 31(2), 47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct201631213

Seal, M. (2021). Hopeful Pedagogies in Higher Education. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350116566

Seal, M., Smith, A. (2021). Enabling Critical Pedagogy in Higher Education. Critical Publishing.

Simon, R. I. (1987). Empowerment as a pedagogy of possibility. Language Arts,64(4), 370-382.

Svensson, O., Adawi, T. y Johansson, A. (2022). Authenticity work in higher education learning environments: a double-edged sword? Higher Education, 84(1), 67-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00753-0

Testa, D. y Egan, R. (2016). How useful are discussion boards and written critical reflections in helping social work students critically reflect on their field education placements? Qualitative Social Work, 15(2), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014565146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014565146

Westwell, G. y Ingle, J. (2019). Mapping Contemporary Cinema: blending critical pedagogy and research-based learning in undergraduate curriculum design. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(7), 842-857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1612356

Wink, J. (2000). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. Longman.

Zion, S., Allen, C. D. y Jean, C. (2015). Enacting a critical pedagogy, influencing teachers’ sociopolitical development. Urban Review, 47(5), 914-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0340-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0340-y