Antecedents and Consequences of the University Professors’ Blended Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Fatemeh Moradi

doi:10.18172/con.5807

Authors

Fatemeh Moradi Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-0439

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/con.5807

Keywords:

virtual education, face-to-face teaching, blended teaching, attitude,, performance

Abstract

The need for virtual education in the context of the COVID-19 crisis (due to the problems encountered), the weaknesses and strengths of this educational approach during this period, and attention to the experience of teachers in the traditional educational approach or, in other words, face-to-face. The motivation and objective of the present study are to examine the predictors and outcomes of blended learning in university professors. The research method was a descriptive-correlational one and the path analysis method was used to study more variables. The statistical population consisted of all professors of Islamic Azad University. This research was conducted in the first semester of the academic year 2021-2022. Accordingly, 235 university professors were randomly selected. The questionnaire (designed by the researcher) was completed online by them, after explaining the objectives of the research and attracting the participation of the participants. SPSS 26 and Amos software were then used for the analysis of the collected data. The results showed that attitudes and skills in virtual education were directly related to the skills and attitudes of blended teaching, skills in face-to-face teaching were correlated with those in the blended teaching; further, attitudes and skills in blended teaching were related to the performance in face-to-face teaching and skills in the blended teaching was correlated with the performance in the virtual education. In addition, skills attitudes in e-learning were directly related to performance in e-learning, and attitudes in face-to-face teaching were correlated with performance in face-to-face teaching. Based on the above explanations, it can be concluded that professors have a positive attitude towards blended learning. In other words, they possess sufficient skills in virtual instruction and are capable of effectively utilizing and generating appropriate course content for students' access to relevant courses. Additionally, they are adept at assessing students' progress throughout the term using new technologies in a virtual format.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bushehrian, O., and Rezaei, M. (2011). Introducing a new architecture based on ontology to automatically create an e-learning path in a service-oriented environment. Sixth National Conference and Third International Conference on E-Learning. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/159776/.

Chiao, H. M., Chen, Y. L., and Huang, W. H. (2018). Examining the usability of an online virtual tour-guiding platform for cultural tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 23, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.05.002

Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., and Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of surgical education, 77(4), 729-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018

Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909

Dastani, M. (2020). COVID-19: A New Beginning in Virtual Education at the Medical Universities of Iran. Horizon of Medical Education Development, 11(1),1-4. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22038/hmed.2020.50428.1059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/edcj.13.38.1

Devi, S. B., Jain, P., and Tyagi, G. (2024). Blended-Learning-Environment for Mathematical Skill Acquisition among Higher Education Learners Using Principal Compound Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 5970-5977. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3888

Dewart, G., Corcoran, L., Thirsk, L., and Petrovic, K. (2020). Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse education today, 92, 104471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471

Dorji, S., and Dorji, U. (2024). The effectiveness of blended learning approach on students' academic performance: A quasi-experiment study. Bhutan Journal of Research and Development, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.13.1.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.13.1.04

Dreyfus, H. (2010). About the Internet: A Philosophical Look at the Internet. Farsinezhad A. Trans Tehran: Saghi Publications (pp. 20-85). [In Persian].

Ebadi, A., and Heidaranlu, E. (2020). Virtual learning: A new experience in the shadow of coronavirus disease. Shiraz E Med J., 21(12), 1-2. [In Persian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/semj.106712

Garrison, D. R., and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Garrison, R. D., and Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Online Teaching and Learning, Jossey-Bass, 227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558

Ghanbri, S., Rezghishirsavar, H., Ziyaeei, M., and Mosleh, M. (2019). Presenting an e-learning evaluation model in the electronic unit of Islamic Azad University. Medical Sciences Studies and Education Development Office, 11(4.911-57:)9. [In Persian].

GHarib, A. (2011). Promoting Critical Thinking in the Master of Virtual Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Professors and Students. Developmental Steps in Medical Education. 8(1), 22-32. [In Persian] https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/1333/WikiRevolutionCATaC2006.pdf?sequenc

Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jonas, D., and Burns, B. (2010). The transition to blended e-learning. Changing the focus of educational delivery in children’s pain management. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.015

Levy, P. (2006). The Impact of Technology in Cyber Culture. University of Minnesota Press.

Mansoori, S., Ziaaldin Salari, K., and Ghasemali, M. (2020). A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of E-learning and Blended Learning in Industrial Training. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences,11(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2020.84352.1006

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., and Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of educational research open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Mitrović, S., Božić, R., and Takači, Đ. (2024). Efficiency of blended learning of calculus content during the Covid19 crisis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2076129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2076129

Mugenyi, J., Chang, Z. K., and Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Shishigu, A., Michael, K., and Atnafu, M. (2024). Effect of blended learning on mathematical achievement and anxiety: A context-based technology integration for meaningful learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530241241767. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241241767

Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., and Casey, D. (2012). Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse education today, 32(4), 464-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014

Staker, H., and Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight institute. http://www.innosightinstitute.org

Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and instructor's experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250-4254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.926

Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M. E., Nölting, K., Röser, M., and Voigt, D. (2004). Is E-learning the Solution for Individual Learning? Electronic Journal of E-learning, 2(2), 273-280.

Viktorija, S., and Dušan, L. (2007). Blended learning and study effectiveness. Issues in Information Systems, 3(1), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2007_127-133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2007_127-133

Zarei Zavaraki, I., Ramezani, M., and Saeedpour, M. (2014). Integrated learning in higher education in Tehran: Avaye No Publications. [In Persian]

Zarei Zavaraki, I., and Safaei, M. (2008). E-learning in the 21st century Tehran. Science and Technology Publications. [In Persian]

Zarei Zavaraki, I., and Toofani, E. (2011). Quarterly Journal of Higher Education. Fourth year, number fourteen, summer, 87-71.