El fomento de la integridad investigadora a través de la educación

Jesús A. Valero Matas

doi:10.18172/con.535

Authors

Jesús A. Valero Matas Universidad de Valladolid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18172/con.535

Keywords:

Investigation politics, profesional ethics, teaching program, investigation program

Abstract

This paper reflects on the situation of research and highlights a series of problems that ravage the scientific community. The exposition is focused on the relevance of research in terms of education and ethical problems. Two main dysfunctions related to research are particularly dealt with: the limited support of public institutions and the interest of private institutions in programs with an added economic value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGAZZI, E.(1996) El bien, el mal y la ciencia. Madrid: Tecnos.

BEBEAU, M. J. (2002) Influencing the moral dimensions of Professional practice: Implications for teaching and Assessing for Research Integrity. Research Review, 18.

BRONCANO, F. (2000). Mundos artificiales. Barcelona: Paidos.

BUNGE, M. (2000). La relación entre la sociología y la filosofía. Madrid: Edaf.

ECHEVERRIA, J. (2002). Ciencia y valores. Barcelona: Destino.

ECHEVERRÍA, J. (2003). La revolución tecnocientífica. México: FCE.

FEYERABEND, P.K. (1986). Tratado contra el método. Madrid: Tecnos.

FISCHER, B.A. y ZIGMOND, M.J. (2001). Promoting responsible conduct in research trough "Survival skills". Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 563-587.

GILMER, P.J. (2002). Assessment and students’ interest: connecting to learning. En WALLACE, J. y LOUDEN. W. (eds). Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice, 11-22. New York: Falmer Press.

HACKING, I. (1999). The construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

HEITMAN, E. y otros (2000). Teaching ethics in biomedical sciences: effects on moral reasoning skills. Washington: Paper of the University of Washington.

HUNDERT, E.M. (1996). Characteristics of the informal curriculum and trainees ethical choices. Academic Medicine, 71, 624-633.

IBARRA, A. y OLIVÉ, L. (2003). Cuestiones éticas en ciencia y tecnología. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva-OEI.

KOVAC, J. (1995). The ethnics Chemist: Case Studies in Scientific ethics. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.

MERTON, R.K. (1980). La sociología de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza.

NAS, J. (1992). Responsible Science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington: National Academy Press.

RESCHER, N. (1999). Razón y Valores en la era científico-tecnica. Barcelona: Paidos/UAB.

REST, J.R. y NARVÁEZ, D.F. (1994). Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

REST, J. y otros (1997). Alchemy and Beyond: Indexing the defining Segues Test. Journal of Educational Phychology, 89, 498-507.

ROUSSEAU, J.J. (1982). El contrato social. Madrid: Edad.

SÁNCHEZ RON, J.M. (2002). Los mundos de la ciencia. Madrid: Espasa.

THUILLIER, P. (1990). De Arquímedes a Einstein, Las caras ocultas de la invención científica. Madrid: Alianza.

VALERO MATAS, J.A. (coord.) (2004a) Sociología de la ciencia. Madrid: EDAF.

VALERO MATAS, J.A. (coord.) (2004b) Social studies of the science. An interdisciplinary context. Madrid, Auckland: Diálogo Europeo, Universidad de Auckland.

VANDERBILT (2000) The cognition and Technology Group. Washington: National Academy Press.